Return-Path: X-Scanned-By: RAE MPP/Clamd http://raeinternet.com/mpp X-Scanned-By: This message was scanned by MPP Lite Edition (www.messagepartners.com)! X-Real-To: stagecraftlist [at] theatrical.net Received: by prxy.net (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.2.10) with PIPE id 22823815; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 03:00:51 -0700 X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 4.2.10 List-Unsubscribe: List-ID: Message-ID: From: "Stagecraft" Sender: "Stagecraft" To: "Stagecraft" Precedence: list Subject: Stagecraft Digest #416 Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 03:00:27 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on prxy.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 X-TFF-CGPSA-Version: 1.4f2 X-prxy-Spam-Filter: Scanned For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- Stagecraft Digest, Issue #416 1. Re: Building a Window by "Paul Guncheon" 2. Window lattice, muntins or mullions by "Dougherty, Jim" 3. ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest by "Sarah Clausen" 4. Re: designer anniversaries for June by "Russel Drapkin" 5. Re: MSDS Resources by "richard j. archer" 6. Re: MSDS Resources by Stephen Litterst 7. Re: Another Stage Related Accident by "Scheu Consulting Services" 8. Re: Another Stage Related Accident - similar but less tragic incident by IAEG [at] aol.com 9. Re: MSDS Resources by Jerry Durand 10. Re: ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest by "Tony Deeming" 11. Re: MSDS Resources by "Klyph Stanford" 12. OT--varnish removal question by Jacqueline Haney Kidwell 13. Re: OT--varnish removal question by "Jon Ares" 14. rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by "Storms, Randy" 15. Re: OT--varnish removal question by Chuck Mitchell 16. Re: OT--varnish removal question by doran [at] bard.edu 17. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by Mike Brubaker 18. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by "Paul Schreiner" 19. Wisdom of the list by Marty_Petlock [at] sarasotagov.com 20. Re: Star*Par Vs. Source 4 Par by Marty_Petlock [at] sarasotagov.com 21. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by Delbert Hall 22. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by Shawn Palmer 23. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by doran [at] bard.edu 24. Re: Technical -Position Description by Peter Simmel 25. Soundtrack Pro by Steve Larson 26. Re: ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest by "Chris Warner" 27. Re: ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest by "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" 28. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by Bill Sapsis 29. Re: ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest by "Chris Warner" 30. Is this wise ? :) by "crewcall" 31. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by "MIke Katz" 32. Re: Better Way to make a window frame? by Al Fitch 33. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by Bill Sapsis 34. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by "Secore, Scott" 35. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by Jerry Durand 36. Re: Star*Par Vs. Source 4 Par by FrankWood95 [at] aol.com 37. Re: Patch boxes by FrankWood95 [at] aol.com 38. Re: re Dead Cat Soap by FrankWood95 [at] aol.com 39. Re: ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest by "Steve B." 40. Test - Please Ignore by "Jeremiah Minh Greenblatt" 41. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by usctd [at] columbia.sc 42. Re: Soundtrack Pro by Jason Romney 43. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by Shawn Palmer 44. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by Stuart Wheaton 45. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by Stuart Wheaton 46. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by "Klyph Stanford" 47. Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms by Seth Richardson *** Please update the subject line of your reply to use the subject *** line of the message you are replying to! Please only reply to *** one message subject in each reply. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 02:50:30 -1000 From: "Paul Guncheon" Subject: Re: Building a Window Message-id: <01db01c56771$a9556b00$0202a8c0 [at] lastpc> References: Kinda long... from a book I started to write many years ago: <> Laters, Paul "This tuna is excellent," said Tom superficially. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:13:16 -0400 Subject: Window lattice, muntins or mullions From: "Dougherty, Jim" Message-ID: One way I've started using to make windows for the stage, especially the joint between the muntins (lattice) and the frame, is with pocket screws and a Kreg jig. It is a system that guides a special drill bit at a shallow angle through the lattice piece, and screws to hold it to the frame. It's strong, fast and pretty accurate, which I like. It will work on materials as thin as 1/2". The downside (although not everyone will see it as one) is that you have to buy another tool and special fasteners. One other advantage that it shares with biscuit joinery is that you cut your pieces to exact length - you don't have to leave extra material for a tenon. That simplifies making a cut list. The problem with a biscuit joiner for this project is not that the slot is only 1/8" thick. If you're using it to make a complete mortise, you're missing the point of the tool (and you'll end up making shallow tenons with a curved end on each lattice piece. Blech.). The smallest width on most joiners, though, is over 2" wide, and that's much wider than your 1". Some joiners can use special narrow biscuits but you also need to change the blade, and that seems like a waste of your time if you're only making one window or only have one joiner. As someone else suggested, you can make notches on the back of the inside frame piece, into which the completed lattice will fit. Then it can be screwed and glued in place. You can set up a router or radial arm saw to do this quickly and accurately, and that will help keep the lattice nice and square, too. All of this stuff is pretty fast; you should have plenty of time to finish by next Monday or Tuesday - assuming, of course, that this is the only project you're working on and can devote your full attention to it. And we know what happens when one assumes. Good luck, and let us know which method you finally use. - Jim Dougherty ATD, Middlebury College Theatre Department ------------------------------ Subject: ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 08:18:25 -0500 Message-ID: <0B70E9798A3B4E4080E46327FA359F2194BE68 [at] MIDL-MAILV.etcconnect.com> From: "Sarah Clausen" Hi all - Long time no post (and then I go shamelessly commercial when I do, what's happened to me....) I had the pleasure of meeting some of you at the USITT conference this year - it was great to put faces to the signatures! Some of you had the opportunity to see a demonstration of our newest console, the Congo. I thought I'd pass along a link to PLSN for a press release we've put out regarding Congo's final beta test. http://plsn.net/eve/ubb.x/a/tpc/f/848106391/m/774109555 I hope everyone is having a great start to their summer! Sarah Sarah Clausen Product Manager Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc. ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "Russel Drapkin" Subject: RE: designer anniversaries for June Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:39:59 -0400 Organization: Russel Drapkin Lighting Designer Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Heh.. He'll be here all week, the 7:30 show is completely different from the 9:30 show. We swear. -Russel >From: "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" > Or are there two Abe Feders? :) >...And if one's in a bad mood, does that make him a cross Feder? ============================== Russel Drapkin USA Lighting Designer 92 Pinehurst Avenue #4D New York, New York 10033 (212) 543-2514 russel [at] rpddesign.com AIM: RusselDrapkinLD ------------------------------ Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 08:42:21 -0500 From: "richard j. archer" Subject: Re: MSDS Resources > >Hello all. I am starting to collect and organize MSDS's here in our >shop and I need some guidance. > > > >Mike Wade >Daedalus Design and Production Inc. >mike [at] focusnote.com Lot's of online sites. Here at Cornell they keep an online searchable database of about 250,000 items. Departments are supposed to send over anything we get in but compliance is not enforceable since there is no central control over what is shipped into this large university. Dick A. TD, Cornell Univ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:55:42 -0400 From: Stephen Litterst Subject: Re: MSDS Resources Message-id: <429F0FDE.ACB78D44 [at] ithaca.edu> Organization: IC-Dept. of Theatre Arts References: "richard j. archer" wrote: > --------------------------------------------------- > Lot's of online sites. Here at Cornell they keep an online > searchable database of about 250,000 items. Departments are > supposed to send over anything we get in but compliance is not > enforceable since there is no central control over what is shipped > into this large university. Here at IC, the college has retained an outside EH&S company to maintain our MSDS inventory. They have an 800 number which we have posted on every phone in the production area. If you need to know anything about a chemical, you can call and they'll answer your questions and/or fax you the relevant MSDS. The main burden this lifts from us is having to keep current on *every* MSDS. Companies update and change their MSDS's constantly it gets overwhelming to keep the book up-to-date. Now all we have to do is a yearly inventory and contact our rep anytime we get a new chemical or hazmat during the interim. Steve Litterst -- Stephen C. Litterst Technical Supervisor Ithaca College Dept. of Theatre Arts 607/274-3947 slitterst [at] ithaca.edu ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "Scheu Consulting Services" Cc: Doomster [at] worldnet.att.net (Randall Davidson) Subject: RE: Another Stage Related Accident Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:18:24 -0400 Organization: Scheu Consulting Services, Inc. Message-ID: In-reply-to: More sketchy details below from the Daily Star, the daily newspaper in Oneonta, NY, the closest "city" to Afton. Again, the counterweight system is double purchased, operated from a "catwalk" - really the top of room/storage area - offstage. I suspect = that there being 2X the weight in the arbor than on-stage, the overbalance = was significant. And the natural reaction to hold on to the line and control set as it started to run took over, rather than to just get away from the falling arbor. Mr. Kappel apparently held on until he hit the bottom of the = loading gallery above, and then fell back to the concrete. It's what can happen when we take our eyes off the ball, or training is lacking. Very sad and very avoidable. Peter Scheu Scheu Consulting Services, Inc. www.scheuconsulting.com Tel: 315.422.9984 fax: 413.513.4966 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D A Norwich man died in a fall Tuesday at Afton Central School while = working in the school's auditorium, state police at Sidney said Wednesday.=20 Martin W. Kappel, 51, a self-employed technical theater worker, was on a 10-foot catwalk above the stage area working on the lighting system at = about 1:10 p.m. He failed to remove the counterweights from a pulley system, = and when he released a brake, the weights dropped to a lower pulley, police said. Kappel was thrown 20 feet into a steel girder on the ceiling before = falling to the concrete catwalk, where he hit his head, troopers said. State police Senior Inv. Ricky Charles said Wednesday that no one = witnessed the accident but that two janitors were below Kappel on the stage. He = said no students were in the auditorium at the time. Charles said Kappel was working for the school district on lighting previously installed by a subcontractor. "It's my understanding that he was just there adjusting things," Charles said. Charles said he did not know if Kappel was being paid for his services = or if he was working in a volunteer capacity. Kappel was pronounced dead at The Hospital in Sidney from massive head trauma, police said. Afton Superintendent Elizabeth Briggs said she did not want to comment = on the details of the incident. "It was a tragedy, and our thoughts go out = to the family," Briggs said. She said the school had grief counselors = available for staff and students Wednesday. Kappel taught occasional classes in the area on theater, stage lighting = and set design, and he also provided lighting and design services to = schools, theaters and dance companies. Martina Anderson, associate director of communications at Hartwick = College, said Kappel taught a course last summer at the college's Pine Lake Environmental Campus. "He was scheduled to teach courses there this summer," Anderson said. = "Over the years, Kappel has several times served as a guest instructor in = theater arts at Hartwick." Kappel is survived by his wife and two sons, according to an obituary. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D ------------------------------ From: IAEG [at] aol.com Message-ID: <1f4.af6d150.2fd07243 [at] aol.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:31:31 EDT Subject: Re: Another Stage Related Accident - similar but less tragic incident In a message dated 6/2/05 10:19:16 AM, peter [at] scheuconsulting.com writes: << Again, the counterweight system is double purchased, operated from a "catwalk" - really the top of room/storage area - offstage. I suspect that there being 2X the weight in the arbor than on-stage, the overbalance was significant. And the natural reaction to hold on to the line and control set as it started to run took over, rather than to just get away from the falling arbor. Mr. Kappel apparently held on until he hit the bottom of the loading gallery above, and then fell back to the concrete. >> as a "youngster" (16 maybe?) I recall something similar happening to me with a double purchase system. I was alone in the theatre, and went to adjust a light weight drop that was "floating" above the deck. I had no idea how far out of weight it was. I released the brake and was lifted off of my feet immediately I caught my toes under the locking rail and was for a moment ( it seemed like an eternity I assure you! ) I was being stretched out, holding on with my hands to the rope on one end, and my toes on the locking rail at the other end. I yelled and screamed for help, not wanting to let go and let the system run and crash, until I realized that there was no one else in the theatre to help I eventually somehow managed to get the lock on, and step up on the rail. I had to peel my fingers off the rope and my legs were wobbly for almost two hours after the incident. needless to say, some lessons learned; a the "buddy system" is a good idea and works well in the theatre as well as in the water! b don't ever, ever, ever leave a line set that far out of weight! c check by "feel" an "unknown" line set before unlocking, , , please! very best, Keith Arsenault IAEG - International Arts & Entertainment Group Tampa, Florida ------------------------------ Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.0.20050602080515.029e3320 [at] 192.168.0.13> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 08:07:13 -0700 From: Jerry Durand Subject: Re: MSDS Resources In-Reply-To: References: At 06:55 AM 6/2/2005, you wrote: >The main burden this lifts from us is having to keep current on >*every* MSDS. Companies update and change their MSDS's constantly it >gets overwhelming to keep the book up-to-date. Now all we have to do >is a yearly inventory and contact our rep anytime we get a new >chemical or hazmat during the interim. Since MSDS's change often and the changes go into a central store...is there any requirement for notice to users that there WAS a change? Actually, is there a requirement that anyone read the MSDS? I must admit I haven't read the MSDS on sand or water lately so I don't know if there are any changes. ---------- Jerry Durand Durand Interstellar, Inc. 219 Oak Wood Way Los Gatos, California 95032-2523 USA tel: +1 408 356-3886, USA toll free: 1 866 356-3886 web: www.interstellar.com ------------------------------ From: "Tony Deeming" Subject: RE: ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:08:46 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: -----Original Message----- From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net]On Behalf Of Sarah Clausen Sent: 02 June 2005 14:18 To: Stagecraft Subject: ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- Hi all - Long time no post (and then I go shamelessly commercial when I do, what's happened to me....) I had the pleasure of meeting some of you at the USITT conference this year - it was great to put faces to the signatures! Some of you had the opportunity to see a demonstration of our newest console, the Congo. I thought I'd pass along a link to PLSN for a press release we've put out regarding Congo's final beta test. http://plsn.net/eve/ubb.x/a/tpc/f/848106391/m/774109555 I hope everyone is having a great start to their summer! Sarah I understand that the first console in the UK is to go to a local venue near me this month - my daughters are dancing in a show this weekend there, so I've been chatting with one of the house techs who can't wait to get a hold of it!! 8-) Ynot ------------------------------ Message-ID: <003c01c5678d$15d7efd0$0800a8c0 [at] Klyphsmachine> Reply-To: "Klyph Stanford" From: "Klyph Stanford" References: Subject: Re: MSDS Resources Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:06:38 -0400 Jerry Durand asked : "Actually, is there a requirement that anyone read the MSDS? " I would think the law could be interpreted that any supervisor instructing an employee to use a chemicall would be required to know the potential hazards of that substance. Otherwise, how could he/ she instruct her/ him in it's proper use? I am sure Dr. Doom could shed some light. \ Klyph ------------------------------ Message-ID: <20050602165118.50629.qmail [at] web52003.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:51:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Jacqueline Haney Kidwell Subject: OT--varnish removal question There are drips on my bathroom floor from the refinishing of the door. It might be urethane, it could be varnish or shellac. Mineral spirits didn't budge it, nor did acetone. Any ideas how to remove these spots that are annoying me so much? It's generic vinyl flooring, and I don't want to gouge it. Whoever last worked on the house we rent did a lousy job on a lot of things. There was drywall compound caked in the toilet, most of the windows painted shut, etcetera. And when the freezer with icemaker was taken out of the basement, the water supply was left drizzling into the dirt floor. Jacki __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Message-ID: <000701c56797$ce82fa20$0600000a [at] BRUTUS> From: "Jon Ares" References: Subject: Re: OT--varnish removal question Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:23:35 -0700 > Whoever last worked on the house we rent did a lousy > job on a lot of things. There was drywall compound > caked in the toilet, I feel your pain... my tub/shower was re-tiled a number of years ago, and the contractor used the toilet as his wash-basin. It has caked mastic and grout in it..... -- Jon Ares Program Director, West Linn HS Theatre Arts www.hevanet.com/acreative www.wlhstheatre.org ------------------------------ Subject: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:35:55 -0700 Message-ID: <555928311F8B2943B65FC7197942C3B7323AD1 [at] es1.bsdnet.wednet.edu> From: "Storms, Randy" I'm planning to make the jump from lumber to steel for Noises Off this = summer. I've seen some touring sets constructed from ~1" square tubing, = so I thought I'd start there; but this will be my first experience = designing with steel, and I'm a bit nervous about the engineering of it. Are there some basic rules of thumb? Any good on-line resources? The = Backstage Handbook has some information, but not enough to really get me = rolling. To narrow the question: suppose you are constructing a 4'W x 8'L x 8'H = platform from 1" square tubing, with a 3/4" plywood deck, with the idea = that 5-6 adult actors could at some point be jumping around on it. =20 At what interval should the uprights be spaced? Are diagonals = necessary? Would it be better to use a different size tube? =20 As this project will also require that I learn how to weld, I could use = some guidance with that, too: What is the most appropriate flavor of = welding apparatus for the project as described? Oxyacetylene? MIG? or = ??? (fear not, I *will* be getting some actual instruction before = beginning). =20 "I'll quit when they make me stop trying new stuff..." -- r. Randy Storms rstorms [at] bham.wednet.edu ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 12:37:26 -0500 From: Chuck Mitchell Subject: RE: OT--varnish removal question In-reply-to: Message-id: <000001c56799$be51db60$0be25c90 [at] Chuck> In my house, other than when I am remodeling, is that such marks become part of the history of the house! Chuck Mitchell Scene Studio Supervisor University Theatre-University of Wisconsin Madison 608-263-3330 FAX 608-265-4075 "There are drips on my bathroom floor from the refinishing of the door. It might be urethane, it could be varnish or shellac. Mineral spirits didn't budge it, nor did acetone. Any ideas how to remove these spots that are annoying me so much? " ------------------------------ Message-ID: <1117733907.429f4413231ae [at] webmail.bard.edu> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:38:27 -0400 From: doran [at] bard.edu Subject: Re: OT--varnish removal question References: In-Reply-To: Jacki, Have you tried regular old isopropyl alcohol 70%? Way back in the 70's, Armstrong used to recommend that for the wiping away of their logos and information that used to be stamped on their vinyl flooring. Manufacturers also recommend ammonia to clean and maintain their linoleum sheet and tile floors. I knew that those job experiences would come in handy some day Good luck, Andy Champ-Doran Quoting Jacqueline Haney Kidwell : > There are drips on my bathroom floor from the > refinishing of the door. It might be urethane, it > could be varnish or shellac. Mineral spirits didn't > budge it, nor did acetone. Any ideas how to remove > these spots that are annoying me so much? It's > generic vinyl flooring, and I don't want to gouge it. > Jacki ------------------------------ Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050602124346.01e1f358 [at] mail.insightbb.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 12:45:32 -0500 From: Mike Brubaker Subject: Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms In-Reply-To: References: Get a copy of Holden and Sammler's "Structural Design for the Stage". I believe that Broadway Press carries it, along with some other members of the list. MIke At 12:35 PM 6/2/2005, Storms, Randy wrote: >Are there some basic rules of thumb? Any good on-line resources? The >Backstage Handbook has some information, but not enough to really get me >rolling. ------------------------------ Subject: RE: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:49:16 -0400 Message-ID: <6E497ADB607656479C24E6D7BF6B505A0196C82D [at] exchange.rmwc.edu> From: "Paul Schreiner" > To narrow the question: suppose you are constructing a 4'W x=20 > 8'L x 8'H platform from 1" square tubing, with a 3/4" plywood=20 > deck, with the idea that 5-6 adult actors could at some point=20 > be jumping around on it. =20 > At what interval should the uprights be spaced? Are=20 > diagonals necessary? Would it be better to use a different=20 > size tube? =20 The answers to this kinda depend on what's going on around the platform in question...is the rest of the set lumber or steel frame? How does this tie in with the remainder? How is access gained to this height? And so on... Though I should add that my gut instinct would be to look at something beefier than 1" square... > As this project will also require that I learn how to weld, I=20 > could use some guidance with that, too: What is the most=20 > appropriate flavor of welding apparatus for the project as=20 > described? Oxyacetylene? MIG? or ??? (fear not, I *will*=20 > be getting some actual instruction before beginning). =20 I've never tried oxyacetylene. I learned first with a stick, and use a MIG regularly. Which you start with is kinda like learning to drive on a manual transmission...if you learn how to drive a stick, you can drive anything, while learning the automatic (read: MIG) first just means you still have to develop stick skills for those larger projects that a MIG normally won't handle. ------------------------------ Subject: Wisdom of the list Message-ID: From: Marty_Petlock [at] sarasotagov.com Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:55:56 -0400 Our local School Board Maintenance Department wants to issue an RFP for repair & maintenance of school (lots of them) theatrical equipment - basically Lighting & Sound. I used to do a lot of that work and they've asked me to help write the proposal spec's. Anyone out there done this before or have suggestions? Please reply off list. Thanks, Marty Petlock Technical Facilities Manager Van Wezel P.A.H. Sarasota, FL. ********** E-mail messages sent or received by City of Sarasota officials and employees in connection with official City business are public records subject to disclosure under the Florida Public Records Act. ********** ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Re: Star*Par Vs. Source 4 Par Message-ID: From: Marty_Petlock [at] sarasotagov.com Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:58:35 -0400 ETC vs Altman? Oh puhlease. Marty Petlock Technical Facilities Manager Van Wezel P.A.H. Sarasota, FL. ********** E-mail messages sent or received by City of Sarasota officials and employees in connection with official City business are public records subject to disclosure under the Florida Public Records Act. ********** ------------------------------ Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:16:03 -0400 From: Delbert Hall Reply-To: Delbert Hall Subject: Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms In-Reply-To: References: Randy, It has been a while since I constructed platforms from steel, but when I was at the Univ. of Florida we used 1.5" square tubing (16 guage) for the frames and legs on platforms. I have also used platforms constructed from 1" x 2" rectangular tubing. These were very strong and I liked them a lot. If your platform is going to be legged to a height of 8 feet, you will definately need cross bracing on the legs. I prefer MIG welding over oxyacetylene, but both should work well. I am sure that others on the list will offer their opinions on what size and style of steel they prefer. Try out several sizes of steel and designs, and see which you feel most comfortable with. Good luck. -Delbert =20 On 6/2/05, Storms, Randy wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- >=20 > I'm planning to make the jump from lumber to steel for Noises Off this su= mmer. I've seen some touring sets constructed from ~1" square tubing, so I= thought I'd start there; but this will be my first experience designing wi= th steel, and I'm a bit nervous about the engineering of it. >=20 > Are there some basic rules of thumb? Any good on-line resources? The Ba= ckstage Handbook has some information, but not enough to really get me roll= ing. >=20 > To narrow the question: suppose you are constructing a 4'W x 8'L x 8'H p= latform from 1" square tubing, with a 3/4" plywood deck, with the idea that= 5-6 adult actors could at some point be jumping around on it. > At what interval should the uprights be spaced? Are diagonals necessary?= Would it be better to use a different size tube? >=20 > As this project will also require that I learn how to weld, I could use s= ome guidance with that, too: What is the most appropriate flavor of weldin= g apparatus for the project as described? Oxyacetylene? MIG? or ??? (fe= ar not, I *will* be getting some actual instruction before beginning). >=20 > "I'll quit when they make me stop trying new stuff..." > -- r. >=20 > Randy Storms > rstorms [at] bham.wednet.edu >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 --=20 Delbert Hall Phone: 423-773-4255 ------------------------------ Message-ID: <429F4D8D.8070808 [at] sbcglobal.net> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:18:53 -0500 From: Shawn Palmer Subject: Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms References: In-Reply-To: >As this project will also require that I learn how to weld, I could use >some guidance with that, too: What is the most appropriate flavor of >welding apparatus for the project as described? Oxyacetylene? MIG? >or ??? (fear not, I *will* be getting some actual instruction before >beginning). > >"I'll quit when they make me stop trying new stuff..." >-- r. > >Randy Storms >rstorms [at] bham.wednet.edu In my 'other' line of work, I've got a shop with various flavors of welders. For this, I'd say MIG (or GMAW.) The 'G' obviously means gas- I'd vote against flux-cored arc welding with the MIG machine. It isn't as nice and will require more clean up. MIG will probably be the easiest to learn. ARC will be the next easiest, and last would be TIG (or GTAW.) You can get a new Miller Millermatic 135 MIG welder (which should work for this and is kind of portable) for a shade over $600. Hobart, which is owned by Miller, isn't as 'fancy' and is quite a bit cheaper. You can get a Hobart MIG similar to the Millermatic 135 for under $300 at places like Harbor Freight. These units have a 20% duty cycle, though, so to increase the speed of your fabrication you may have to go to a larger unit (or get multiple smaller units.) The 175 (at 230VAC) has a 30% duty cycle. I grew up on Miller, and have only occasionally used Lincoln. They look to be about the same, I guess. Never used an ESAB other than as a cutting torch. FWIW Shawn Palmer Neenah, WI USA ------------------------------ Message-ID: <1117737720.429f52f820b7d [at] webmail.bard.edu> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:42:00 -0400 From: doran [at] bard.edu Subject: Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms References: In-Reply-To: Randy, You might try contacting your local steel supplier. You'll find that they have lots of engineering data for what they have, and you might be able to swing a hard copy of a steel catalogue from them. At the very least, they can point you to manufacturers web sites, and fax you data and catalogue pages. They will also be able to make suggestions on which is their best product to use for your applications. As far as learning goes, while I am not a certified welder, I did learn on a Lincoln 225 Arc welder (that's stick to you and me). From my experience, stick is harder to learn on, but once you learn that, you can pretty much learn the other types of welding pretty easily. It's cheap to get into, much cheaper than MIG, for example. Figure around $400-$500 to get rolling, and you don't have to mess with a bunch of compressed gas tanks. That makes it more portable, too. Also, while it's harder to weld with stick, it is much easier to see your mistakes. I think this is very important when you and your students are learning. Whatever you do, practice, practice, practice. Burn up lots of rod or wire, lots of scrap steel, and cut it and grind it to see what you're doing right and wrong. Get advice from experienced welders. And be careful with your safety. Use all of the Personal Protective Equipment suggested, including long sleeves and proper gloves. Good luck, Andy Champ-Doran Quoting "Storms, Randy" : > thought I'd start there; but this will be my first experience designing with > steel, and I'm a bit nervous about the engineering of it. > Are there some basic rules of thumb? Any good on-line resources? > Would it be better to use a different size tube? > As this project will also require that I learn how to weld, I could use some > guidance with that, too: What is the most appropriate flavor of welding > apparatus for the project as described? Oxyacetylene? MIG? or ??? (fear > not, I *will* be getting some actual instruction before beginning). > > "I'll quit when they make me stop trying new stuff..." > -- r. ------------------------------ Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:52:49 -0500 From: Peter Simmel Subject: Re: Technical -Position Description We are in the process of developing a Job Description for a new position - Head of Design Scenic-Lighting and Costumes- here in the Theatre Dept to be sent out in the Fall (2005) with the position beginning in the Fall of 2006. It will be a tenured track position with teaching responsibilities. What we would like is to see what other descriptions people have developed in the past for this type of position. We are familiar with ARTSEARCH and the Chronicle and will be looking for similar job descriptions in developing our own. The job responsibilities, number of courses to be taught, educational requirements, resume, cover letter, references etc. we feel comfortable with in knowing what part they have in the description. What would be most helpful is some feedback in regards to any "format" standards for Technical position applications. Is the standard for design Portfolios now "electronic" (CD, DVD -both platforms PC/Mac)? Are "paper" designs, renderings, production pictures and programs etc. still acceptable for Technical positions? You can reply off List with similar job descriptions you have, or others you might have used in developing your own. We have the entire summer to develop this description but feel some need to initiate the process now given the other major change that is also occurring -the University is changing over to a four credit course model starting in the Fall of 2006. Thanks for your help Peter Simmel Professor-Theatre U of M ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:26:35 -0400 Subject: Soundtrack Pro From: Steve Larson Message-ID: Anyone on the list familiar with Soundtrack Pro. It's a new application from Apple designed to work in conjunction with the Final Cut Pro software. It will work alone for multi-track sound editing. Another note: Adobe is taking over Macromedia later this year. Imagine buying a company just to get Flash. Steve ------------------------------ Message-ID: <0b9001c567ae$f37bbb70$6401a8c0 [at] chris> From: "Chris Warner" References: Subject: Re: ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:09:15 -0700 ANy links to pictures, or technical data for the console? Nothing on the website as of yet. Thanks in advance. Chris Warner ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sarah Clausen" To: "Stagecraft" Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 6:18 AM Subject: ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- Hi all - Long time no post (and then I go shamelessly commercial when I do, what's happened to me....) I had the pleasure of meeting some of you at the USITT conference this year - it was great to put faces to the signatures! Some of you had the opportunity to see a demonstration of our newest console, the Congo. I thought I'd pass along a link to PLSN for a press release we've put out regarding Congo's final beta test. http://plsn.net/eve/ubb.x/a/tpc/f/848106391/m/774109555 I hope everyone is having a great start to their summer! Sarah Sarah Clausen Product Manager Electronic Theatre Controls, Inc. -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.4.0 - Release Date: 6/1/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.5.0 - Release Date: 6/2/2005 ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" Subject: RE: ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:06:48 -0400 Message-ID: <000c01c567ae$9f2db370$6601a8c0 [at] Dell> In-Reply-To: > ANy links to pictures, or technical data for the console? > Nothing on the website as of yet. You can get onto ETC's website? I haven't been able to access it for a couple of days now. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 16:12:55 -0400 Subject: Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms From: Bill Sapsis Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Oxyacetylene is more like brazing, not welding. It is definitely not structural and takes forever, relatively speaking. So you should forget about that type. Mig, which is psuedo-structural, will work just fine for this application. If you were doing real structural work you would either TIG or stick. I learned on a stick machine and prefer it to the other types, mainly cuz most of the other types weren't all that common in scene shops way back when. But now it's more personal preference than anything else. Bill S. www.sapsis-rigging.com 800.727.7471 800.292.3851 fax 267.278.4561 mobile Please support the Long Reach Long Riders on their 2nd annual benefit ride http://sapsis-rigging.com/LRLR.html on 6/2/05 1:49 PM, Paul Schreiner at pschreiner [at] rmwc.edu wrote: >> As this project will also require that I learn how to weld, I >> could use some guidance with that, too: What is the most >> appropriate flavor of welding apparatus for the project as >> described? Oxyacetylene? MIG? or ??? (fear not, I *will* >> be getting some actual instruction before beginning). ------------------------------ Message-ID: <0ba101c567af$8952f460$6401a8c0 [at] chris> From: "Chris Warner" Cc: stagecraft [at] jeffsalzberg.com References: Subject: Re: ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:13:26 -0700 Sure was... www.etcconnect.com Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" To: "Stagecraft" Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 1:06 PM Subject: Re: ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > > > ANy links to pictures, or technical data for the console? > > Nothing on the website as of yet. > > You can get onto ETC's website? I haven't been able to access it for a > couple of days now. > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.5.0 - Release Date: 6/2/2005 > > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.5.0 - Release Date: 6/2/2005 ------------------------------ Message-ID: <000e01c567af$213d4b50$c801a8c0 [at] tricia> From: "crewcall" References: Subject: Is this wise ? :) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 21:10:32 +0100 Has anyone had any dealing with the company below http://www.wholesalehunter.com/ Wholesale Hunter 3059 Audrain Road 581 Vandalia, MO 63382 I wish to buy from them a (Winchester Fixed Knife & Tool Gift Set (22-47187) ) but they do not take UK credit/debit cards drawn on UK banks or paypal.They want certified funds - money order, cashiers check, bank draft, etc.Is this wise ? :) with shipping it's only $42.08 US but I would hate to line the pockets of a rip-off-artist . Cheers Chris / http://kick-butt.co.uk ------------------------------ Message-Id: <200506022020.j52KKUI2010281 [at] outgoing.mit.edu> From: "MIke Katz" Subject: RE: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:20:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: Bill, It is not often that you let us say "what are you drinking" with glee on our Faces. 1. Oxyacetylene Welding is welding. Period. It is like Tig welding but using flame instead of arc for heat. 2. Mig can certainly be structural, the problem with it is that you must set it up correctly or else it could look like it is fine but it could have no strength. It is probably the fastest and easiest welding to learn today. 3. Tig is great for aluminum but it is harder to learn and it has NO inherent advantage over Mig 4. Stick can be fine except it is dirty and slow and kind of old fashioned So see if you can find a reasonably priced mig machine and get some training and have fun. Mike snip Oxyacetylene is more like brazing, not welding. It is definitely not structural and takes forever, relatively speaking. So you should forget about that type. Mig, which is psuedo-structural, will work just fine for this application. If you were doing real structural work you would either TIG or stick. I learned on a stick machine and prefer it to the other types, mainly cuz most of the other types weren't all that common in scene shops way back when. But now it's more personal preference than anything else. Bill S. snip [Katz & Gritz Mishpokhe] Mike Katz TD MIT Theater Arts ------------------------------ Message-ID: <20050602204523.26891.qmail [at] web51401.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:45:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Al Fitch Subject: Re: Better Way to make a window frame? In-Reply-To: Yeah, on the way to work today I had the dado thought. I figure I should buy the material (lattice) first so I have the thickness. If for nothing else, the hour commute is good for thinking. Al Al, I may be picturing this wrong but might it be easier to make full-length dado cuts in the frame pieces (table saw or router) rather than trying to align multiple cuts with multiple lattice members? I'm thinking of a system similar to affixing the bottom of a cabinet drawer - just larger scale. - J.Minh Be Kind, Smile and Have Fun. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 16:55:06 -0400 Subject: Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms From: Bill Sapsis Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Sigh. OK. My phrasing was off. You're right, technically, about the oxy rig. But there is very little penetration with oxy so, as I said, it is more like brazing. ie: the connection material is built up on the surface. I base my comments on mig -v- tig on my understanding that all the reputable truss guys use tig for building their products, not mig. And they seem to have their reasons. And yes, stick is dirty and slow and kind of old fashioned. Then again...so am I. Well, maybe not the dirty part. (I have a mig here in the shop and I know how to use it <>) Thanks for the response. Bill S. www.sapsis-rigging.com 800.727.7471 800.292.3851 fax 267.278.4561 mobile Please support the Long Reach Long Riders on their 2nd annual benefit ride http://sapsis-rigging.com/LRLR.html on 6/2/05 4:20 PM, MIke Katz at mkatz [at] MIT.EDU wrote: > It is not often that you let us say "what are you drinking" with glee on our > Faces. > 1. Oxyacetylene Welding is welding. Period. It is like Tig welding but using > flame instead of arc for heat. > 2. Mig can certainly be structural, the problem with it is that you must set > it up correctly or else it could look like it is fine but it could have no > strength. It is probably the fastest and easiest welding to learn today. > 3. Tig is great for aluminum but it is harder to learn and it has NO > inherent advantage over Mig > 4. Stick can be fine except it is dirty and slow and kind of old fashioned > So see if you can find a reasonably priced mig machine and get some training > and have fun. ------------------------------ Subject: RE: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:53:06 -0400 Message-ID: <346414591B50EE4299DB6686321B8CC701D29294 [at] FACSTAFF.facultystaff.eku.edu> From: "Secore, Scott" Randy Storms wrote: >>As this project will also require that I learn how to weld, I could use some guidance with that, too: What is the most appropriate flavor of welding apparatus for the project as described? Oxyacetylene? MIG? or ??? (fear not, I *will* be getting some actual instruction before beginning).<< MIG is definitely (in my opinion) the easiest to learn. As far as learning to weld, you might want to pick up a copy of the Welder's Handbook by Richard Finch. Pretty good book for beginners. You should be able to get it for about 15-20$ at any Lowes or Home Depot (unless of course you know of a steel supplier, or prefer Amazon or something.) Good luck, be safe, and have fun. Because it is!! -Scott Technical Theatre Specialist Eastern Kentucky University ------------------------------ Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.0.20050602135821.04a23578 [at] 192.168.0.13> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:02:37 -0700 From: Jerry Durand Subject: Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms In-Reply-To: References: At 01:55 PM 6/2/2005, you wrote: >(I have a mig here in the shop and I know how to use it <>) My wife learned on MIG and I learned on stick (for brand fans, she used a Miller, I used a Lincoln). The first time I tried her MIG I almost welded myself to the table, wasn't ready for the fast feed. :) We now have a private-labeled 230A AC/DC stick welder and an oxy-propane cutting/brazing torch. I've used the stick welder for steel and aluminum rocket fins. The fins stayed on past Mach 1, so I must have done it right. :) She used the MIG to weld steel and aluminum. She also used a forge and showed me how to pound hot steel. :) ---------- Jerry Durand Durand Interstellar, Inc. 219 Oak Wood Way Los Gatos, California 95032-2523 USA tel: +1 408 356-3886, USA toll free: 1 866 356-3886 web: www.interstellar.com ------------------------------ From: FrankWood95 [at] aol.com Message-ID: <193.4113a293.2fd0d0b3 [at] aol.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:14:27 EDT Subject: Re: Star*Par Vs. Source 4 Par In a message dated 6/1/05 7:23:22 PM W. Europe Daylight Time, stagecraft [at] jeffsalzberg.com writes: << The Altman unit also has (this is not part of the standard lens kit but is available as a special-order) a Very Wide Flood lens, so if short throw/wide coverage is an issue, this is something to consider. >> Here I go again. WHY is everyone so enthusiastic about PAR lanterns, of whatever sort. If you are interested in lumens per dollar, or lumens per ampere, they have their advantages. I don't think that that is what stage lighting is about. I think it's about painting pictures with light, according to the intentions of the director and designer. PAR lanterns are 6" whitewash brushes: I prefer smaller and more controllable instruments to create my pictures. ------------------------------ From: FrankWood95 [at] aol.com Message-ID: <1ab.39a5e738.2fd0d0b8 [at] aol.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:14:32 EDT Subject: Re: Patch boxes In a message dated 6/1/05 8:30:44 PM W. Europe Daylight Time, psyd [at] cox.net writes: << >I fear that you are right.Who knows what happens inside a miltipin connector? I do. What did you want to know, Frank? >> Chris. I know what happens inside multipin connectores I have specified. Inside those you have specified, I do not. That is the problem. You were moaning about AES standards, on XLR-3 connectors, and about still having to stock phase reversers. Translate that up to multipin connectors. Maybe there are Americanb standards, but I doubt it. ------------------------------ From: FrankWood95 [at] aol.com Message-ID: <79.46b1180f.2fd0d0b7 [at] aol.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:14:31 EDT Subject: Re: re Dead Cat Soap In a message dated 6/1/05 8:09:03 PM W. Europe Daylight Time, psyd [at] cox.net writes: << AES (as it seemed to me when I followed) are a lofty-minded set of engineers who seem to have lost touch with the 'real world'. Good intentions, little understandinbg on how to change the status quo. >> You tell me what the real world does. Random phasing? I know of one organisation which grounds the tips of jack plugs. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 17:33:15 -0400 From: "Steve B." Subject: Re: ETC's new Congo console debuts at Eurovision Song Contest Message-id: <001d01c567ba$afb26810$6401a8c0 [at] SBFF> References: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Warner" > ANy links to pictures, or technical data for the console? Nothing on the > website as of yet. Click on the Avab link at the bottom of the ETCConnect page. SB ------------------------------ From: "Jeremiah Minh Greenblatt" Subject: Test - Please Ignore Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:07:26 -0400 Message-ID: <001501c567d0$3d0bf720$0200a8c0 [at] ROADHAT> ------------------------------ Message-ID: <1395.65.184.112.59.1117758233.squirrel [at] webmail.columbia.sc> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:23:53 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms From: usctd [at] columbia.sc Randy, You will have a blast working with steel. I love it. I find welding and metalwork very theraputic and relaxing. For flattage I use 1" tube. I have met many that use 1.5". I think that's fine for taller stuff or things that have platforms tying into them. I would recomend getting 14G wall thickness. It's a little heavier than 16G (obviously) but it also makes it more forgiving for the novice welder. If you don't have the settings just right, 16G is very easy to blow a hole through. Remember that tubing has a welded seam on it. THis seam is much harder than the other three sides of the tube. If you are making flats that will then get skinned with tech screws, remember to keep this seem towards the back or inside. This way you won't have to screw or drill into it. "> To narrow the question: suppose you are constructing a 4'W x 8'L x 8'H platform from 1" square tubing, with a 3/4" plywood deck, with the idea that 5-6 adult actors could at some point be jumping around on it. > Would it be better to use a different size tube?" I like making platforms out of 2x1x14G rectangular tube. Makes it a little more stable and beefy. It also gives you more room to drill and bolt for legging. You could actualy make the legs out of 1" tube, but I would probably go with 1.5". Definitely will need crossbracing. Depending on your floor, you may want to weld feet made from 1/8" flat bar. Drill a few holes and you have a way to tie into the floor. This also keeps the edges of the tube from eating into the floor. Oxyacetylene? MIG? MIG, MIG, MIG!! I have a couple Millers. Old but very dependable. However, you may want to look into the kits they have at Lowes or the Depot. I love my little flux core Lincoln welder. It can be converted to gas, but I like it the way it is. It produces a very high quality weld. If aesthetics are an issue, there is some slag to brush off. You may also want to look into an OXY/Acetelene kit. Once you start discovering how much you can do with metal you're going to want to be able to heat, bend, cut.....etc. > ??? (fear not, I *will* be getting some actual instruction before > beginning). > As you are learning, break some stuff you have welded. You may be surprised that welds you think look great had absolutely no penetration. On the other hand, it makes you feel really good when you are trying to break something and the wall of the tube peels off with the weld in tact! Use jigs whenever possible. All that heat makes metal frames squirm like the dickens! Have fun! -- Eric Rouse TD-University of SC, Columbia/Soon to be at Penn State! Freelance Foyboy ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: From: Jason Romney Subject: Re: Soundtrack Pro Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 22:37:46 -0400 On Jun 2, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Steve Larson wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > > --------------------------------------------------- > > Anyone on the list familiar with Soundtrack Pro. > It's a new application from Apple designed to > work in conjunction with the Final Cut Pro software. > It will work alone for multi-track sound editing. I attended a demo by Apple on Soundtrack Pro. I seems similar to Wavelab. It's sort of a mix of basic two-track editing and basic multi-track editing. The demo seemed to be targeted at film editors that do film sound and used to use Sound Designer II. It's a lot of paste mixing to design new sound effects. Some important limitations: you can't record anything only import existing audio files. No MIDI features. It seems a bit limited for building theatre sound cues. My impression is that it's great for low-budget filmmakers using Final Cut Pro but there are better tools available for theatre sound. Jason _______________________________________________________ Jason Romney Sound Design Instructor - North Carolina School of the Arts Vice Commissioner for Computing Industry - USITT Sound Commission jason [at] cd-romney.com romneyj [at] ncarts.edu http://www.ncarts.edu/ncsaprod/designandproduction/dtsdw.asp http://www.cd-romney.com > ------------------------------ Message-ID: <20050603033028.10914.qmail [at] web81403.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:30:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Shawn Palmer Subject: Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms In-Reply-To: 6667 --- Bill Sapsis wrote: > Mig, which is psuedo-structural, > will work just fine for > this application. If you were doing real structural > work you would either > TIG or stick. > Bill S. Erm? "Psuedo-structural?" You can have "cold" welds using MIG, TIG or "stick" welding. TIG leaves the best looking weld, and is easy to use on aluminum, easy being a relative term. I think that is why most truss manufacturers use TIG. You also would have to switch the polarity on your MIG to weld aluminum. Not a biggie, but takes a bit of time. I would bet if we tried some destructive testing with MIG and TIG welded truss, both fabricated by a master welder, the MIG welded stuff would come out fine. I had a lab hack up and pull apart some motorcycle frames that utilized these three welding types. All three had strength nearly identical. Many frame fabricators use "TIG welded" as a marketing point, too. The welds are a bit prettier. Yippee. I see no other advantages. Properly stick welded frames are ugly but safe :-) I know of only one guy who uses this slow and old method, but his frames are just fine after they are cleaned up:-) Lastly, pulling from someone else's post... if I were getting a MIG welder, I'd get the gas. FCAW (flux-cored arc welding) still leaves a bit of slag. GMAW (gas metal arc welding, what we usually refer to as MIG) is a bit cleaner. The gas is easy to use and really isn't an issue. Just be sure to shut off your tank when you are done or you'll come out to an empty tank;-) YMMV Shawn P Neenah, WI USA ------------------------------ Message-ID: <429FD33A.60202 [at] fuse.net> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:49:14 -0400 From: Stuart Wheaton Subject: Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms References: In-Reply-To: Storms, Randy wrote: > I'm planning to make the jump from lumber to steel for > Noises Off this summer. I've seen some touring sets > constructed from ~1" square tubing, so I thought I'd > start there; but this will be my first experience > designing with steel, and I'm a bit nervous about the > engineering of it. > > Are there some basic rules of thumb? Any good on-line > resources? The Backstage Handbook has some information, > but not enough to really get me rolling. > > To narrow the question: suppose you are constructing a > 4'W x 8'L x 8'H platform from 1" square tubing, with a > 3/4" plywood deck, with the idea that 5-6 adult actors > could at some point be jumping around on it. At what > interval should the uprights be spaced? Are diagonals > necessary? Would it be better to use a different size > tube? 1x1 by itself is a bit light, you could make the top frame from flat trusses of 1x1 steel and the legs out of box columns made from 1x1 steel. or you could go a bit beefier... For legs, A rule of thumb I like is for the unbraced height not to exceed 40-50 times the small dimension in a tube used as a leg. So a 1" tube without cross bracing or diagonals is good for no more than 4 feet. As any rule of thumb, this varies a bit with gauge of tube and application. > > As this project will also require that I learn how to > weld, I could use some guidance with that, too: What is > the most appropriate flavor of welding apparatus for the > project as described? Oxyacetylene? MIG? or ??? (fear > not, I *will* be getting some actual instruction before > beginning). The Finch book is good, I second that rec. I think Mig is overall the best choice, but care must be taken to really learn to weld with it. It is very easy to lay a pretty bead that never digs into the base metal. TIG is too costly, finicky, and slow for general theatre work. It is used for high precision truss and such because the Tig process is very highly controllable and because it can go so slowly you can see and control the entire weld, mig goes quite fast, and you are partly relying on getting the machine and the operator dialed in properly so the weld can be trusted to be good. Arc is filthy, and cheap, and requires a greater level of skill than Mig, it can be quite frustrating for beginners, and it is not best suited for the lighter guages of tubing used in theatre. Oxy-acetylene is the most versatile tool you can get, you can weld, even very thick metals and very thin ones, you can braze or cut, or just dump enought Joules into some steel to make it very malleable, but it is too slow for general theatrical welding. The Hobart Handler type of 115 volt migs are fine for theatrical gauges of tubing, portable, and easy to power. Do not use flux core wire, get the gas kit and run C25 (a mix of argon and CO2) flux core is filthy. Do not assume the settings on the sticker are the right ones for your application, they are a starting point, you will probably deviate a fair bit before you find the settings that really make YOUR machine run great for YOUR project in YOUR hands. Once you get good results, write 'em down! How do you plan to cut your steel? What kind of welding table are you going to build? What kind of shop space do you have? Auto-dimming helmets are great. So are T nailers. I weld theatre scenery all day long, feel free to pop me a note if you have any questions about setting up your space. Stuart ------------------------------ Message-ID: <429FD736.4020504 [at] fuse.net> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 00:06:14 -0400 From: Stuart Wheaton Subject: Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms References: In-Reply-To: Shawn Palmer wrote: > You also would have to > switch the polarity on your MIG to weld aluminum. This is not true... When using most flux cored wires without gas you need to swap polarity, but when welding with hardwire in either Aluminum, copper, stainless or carbon steel with appropriate gas, you weld with the same polarity. Otherwise, great advice. Stuart ------------------------------ Message-ID: <000001c567f7$1a033cd0$0800a8c0 [at] Klyphsmachine> Reply-To: "Klyph Stanford" From: "Klyph Stanford" References: Subject: Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 00:43:17 -0400 > > And yes, stick is dirty and slow and kind of old fashioned. Then > again...so > am I. Well, maybe not the dirty part. > > > Thanks for the response. > Bill S. > www.sapsis-rigging.com > 800.727.7471 > 800.292.3851 fax > 267.278.4561 mobile Stick does have the advantage of being able to go easily where a mig machine cannot, ie the inside frame of an orchestra lift, or onto the grid. But that probably only matters to installers. mig is certainly much easier to learn, but depending on the structure being welded, i might still go with stick. I am always more sure of my penetration with stick because I can feel it through the rod. why not learn all three? There is no such thing as too many job skills. My 2 cents. Klyph ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 02:55:23 -0400 Subject: Re: rookie welder: structural engineering of steel platforms From: Seth Richardson Message-Id: <751A2E54-D3FC-11D9-9D97-00050201851C [at] adelphia.net> > > On Thursday, June 2, 2005, at 04:53 PM, Secore, Scott wrote: > >> Welder's Handbook by Richard Finch. Pretty good book for beginners. Or Shell out couple of more dollars and get a copy of Modern Welding (9th ed.) Great book Textbook for high school/technical school students. Covers theory, fundamentals, and basic processes. Plus it's 700+ pages (Don't worry it has photo's.) compared to 176 pages. Let me put this ad in for SAFETY. ALWAYS Use all of the Personal Protective Equipment suggested, including long sleeves, proper gloves (Leather) and Masks. I think my personal favor was watching my welding teacher set his glove and sleeve on fire. Don't worry he was OK. As for Stick, Mig or gas start learning with what you have or you can get your hands on cheap. Seth Richardson ------------------------------ End of Stagecraft Digest #416 *****************************