Return-Path: X-Scanned-By: RAE MPP/Clamd http://raeinternet.com/mpp X-Scanned-By: This message was scanned by MPP Lite Edition (www.messagepartners.com)! X-Real-To: stagecraftlist [at] theatrical.net Received: by prxy.net (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.2.10) with PIPE id 23839492; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:00:49 -0700 X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 4.2.10 List-Unsubscribe: List-ID: Message-ID: From: "Stagecraft" Sender: "Stagecraft" To: "Stagecraft" Precedence: list Subject: Stagecraft Digest #466 Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:00:38 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on prxy.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-TFF-CGPSA-Version: 1.4f2 X-prxy-Spam-Filter: Scanned For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- Stagecraft Digest, Issue #466 1. Re: Extreme DMX length? by Herrick Goldman 2. Memorial service for Daryl Duell by MissWisc [at] aol.com 3. blue sky (nitpicking) by Judy 4. dmx lengths by Judy 5. Re: dmx lengths by "Jim at TheatreWireless.com" 6. Re: dmx lengths by Jerry Durand 7. Re: MASONITE. by "Paul Guncheon" 8. Re: dmx lengths by Jerry Durand 9. Re: MASONITE. by "Jon Ares" 10. Re: Equipment Opinions by "C. Dopher" 11. Re: Equipment Opinions by "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" 12. Acoustically Transparent Projection Material? by Stan Jensen 13. Re: dmx lengths by "Bill Nelson" 14. Re: Acoustically Transparent Projection Material? by Bruce Purdy *** Please update the subject line of your reply to use the subject *** line of the message you are replying to! Please only reply to *** one message subject in each reply. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:37:43 -0400 Subject: Re: Extreme DMX length? From: Herrick Goldman Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Thanks Dale. I know my client will say "oh well we want something easy", then the client above them will ask for something more complex. Etc... Etc... So I think the hard way is best for the moment. But I do own an Elation DMX solo and have used them a few times with good results. Thanks to all who have responded. On 7/21/05 5:18 PM, "Dale Farmer" wrote: >> -H > > If these guys are just going to be sitting there illuminating a banner, > you > may > not even need a cable and controller. I don't have a manual handy, but look > at > > the standalone or demo modes that they have. You may be able to just program > them once, and then they will just do their little dance all by themselves. > The other thing is finding one of those little DMX playback boxes. You > insert > a loop of DMX settings, and it will sit there and play those back out until > you > > shut them down. Jerry Durand makes one. Other folks also make them. Need > a PC and the software to setup the program. > http://www.interstellar.com/products.html > > --Dale > > > -- Herrick Goldman Lighting Designer, NYC www.HGLightingDesign.com 917-797-3624 "To the scores of silent alchemists who wreak their joy in darkness and in light bringing magic to life, we bow most humbly. "-CDS ------------------------------ From: MissWisc [at] aol.com Message-ID: <1e5.40be8ce1.30124352 [at] aol.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 08:40:50 EDT Subject: Memorial service for Daryl Duell My hubby, Brian, roomed with Daryl on the recent national tour of "Oklahoma" and toured with him on "Oliver" last year. He died in a boating accident while camping in Alaska last month. I'm sharing the info with the list as there are many who live/work in the NYC area who might want to attend and many in touring houses across the country who may have known Daryl from that. Brian will be there in person and I'll be there in spirit. Kristi From DLottacurl [at] aol.com : <> ------------------------------ Message-ID: <42E115A2.6040806 [at] post.tau.ac.il> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:49:54 +0200 From: Judy Subject: blue sky (nitpicking) > > >Actually the range of scattering happens for all wavelengths >shorter than blue, so the scattering would equally apply in the violet >range. > Umm....the scattering happens to all wavelengths including those longer than blue! But the probability for scattering is proportional to the fourth power of the frequency (that is, inversely proportional to the 4th power of wavelength), so obviously the highest frequencies & shortest wavelengths (blue & purple) will be dominant. You could google Rayleigh scattering. > > ------------------------------ Message-ID: <42E115B7.6040408 [at] post.tau.ac.il> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:50:15 +0200 From: Judy Subject: dmx lengths > > >"Recommended Practice for DMX512" says 1km (3281') is the max. The book = >also says 500m (1640') is prudent for the maximum. Use a splitter = >beyond that. > Well, well, I'm really surprised to hear that. In all the stadium shows I've done we have used splitters for anything over 100 m. ------------------------------ From: "Jim at TheatreWireless.com" Subject: RE: dmx lengths Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:02:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <20050722170243.LMAA27508.tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.net [at] p3m866> A few years ago I had a chance to do a crazy wire length test. I wouldn't do this for a real show, I only did this out of curiosity... I was in a large new stadium (construction not quite completed at the time) with hundreds of pairs of Bell wire terminated at punch-down blocks in numerous closets throughout the building, I created a long circuitous path throughout the building that required several joins at punchdown blocks. The source and destination devices were at different ends of the building. I did this in hopes they were on different power circuits from different distribution paths with some ground/neutral differential. Not CAT5, not shielded, numerous "splices". DMX-out from a DMXter (running on an ac cord) to DMX-in on an RC3 transmitter (just 'cause I had one) worked perfectly. The DMX input on the RC3 was made by Gray Interfaces (now Pathway). AGAIN I'm not saying anyone should do this -- it's simply an illustration of how much room there is with the RS485 protocol using good quality drivers/receivers. There may be more repeaters in the world than are really necessary. Jim www.theatrewireless.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net] On Behalf Of Judy > Sent: July 22, 2005 11:50 AM > To: Stagecraft > Subject: dmx lengths > > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > > --------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > >"Recommended Practice for DMX512" says 1km (3281') is the max. The > >book = also says 500m (1640') is prudent for the maximum. Use a > >splitter = beyond that. > > > Well, well, I'm really surprised to hear that. In all the > stadium shows I've done we have used splitters for anything > over 100 m. > > ------------------------------ Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.0.20050722100919.029edbc0 [at] 192.168.0.13> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:10:25 -0700 From: Jerry Durand Subject: Re: dmx lengths In-Reply-To: References: At 10:02 AM 7/22/2005, you wrote: >There may be more repeaters in the world than are really >necessary. Hey, quit reducing my sales! :) Everyone, you need a repeater any time the wire is over 3 meters long! Buy more! :) :) :) ---------- Jerry Durand Durand Interstellar, Inc. 219 Oak Wood Way Los Gatos, California 95032-2523 USA tel: +1 408 356-3886, USA toll free: 1 866 356-3886 web: www.interstellar.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:16:27 -1000 From: "Paul Guncheon" Subject: Re: MASONITE. Message-id: <005801c58ee1$18d97f20$c6354104 [at] yourxhtr8hvc4p> References: < Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:20:50 -0700 From: Jerry Durand Subject: Re: dmx lengths Some specs seem a bit strict for real-world applications. A while back I designed a board with Gigabit Ethernet on it and if you read the specs., it will almost never work. Things like the wire is to be scrapped anytime it's had more than 25 pounds of pull on it or been bent. Yep, buildings are always wired with no tugging on the cable or bends. Sometimes I wonder what the guys who write some of these things are thinking. But then, I've been to meetings like IC Package standards so I know some of them don't have a clue how things are used/installed. ---------- Jerry Durand Durand Interstellar, Inc. 219 Oak Wood Way Los Gatos, California 95032-2523 USA tel: +1 408 356-3886, USA toll free: 1 866 356-3886 web: www.interstellar.com ------------------------------ Message-ID: <000701c58ee2$6b460070$0600000a [at] BRUTUS> From: "Jon Ares" References: Subject: Re: MASONITE. Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:25:55 -0700 > Sometimes just expanded polystyrene. > If only Mrs. Paul's had the consistency of expanded polystyrene. It's more like the consistency of Elmer's glue and grits. - Jon Ares www.hevanet.com/acreative ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:24:51 -0400 Subject: Re: Equipment Opinions From: "C. Dopher" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <000501c58e13$a9a17220$6501a8c0 [at] D4D3R151> On 7/21/05 12:45 PM, "Randy Whitcomb" wrote: > I have some money available this year and am looking to expand my inventory. > I'd appreciate opinions from those of you who have experience with any of > the following: > Wybron's GoboRam ll and Nexera > HES ColorMerge > Ocean Optics Sea Changer - Looks nice but a bit pricey at $2499 list. > > I don't have scrollers at the moment and would like some. Dichroic units > seem to be where things are headed. Not being limited to a dozen or so > colors and not having to deal with burn outs etc. seems appealing. The big > question is are these units worth the investment? I haven't used any of these products yet, but reviews are promising. Worth a try, right? The money question is a big one. You can get how many scrollers for the cost of one dichroic changer? Speaking as an LD, I'd rather have eight scrollers than two dichroic units on any given show! How much are typical maintenance costs? Can you get a shootout at a local shop and see the color for yourself? Bad blues might be a problem! All other things being equal, the personnel factor should be important to you. Who will be using these items? How often? Who will be HANDLING these things and will you have time to train them to do it right and avoid breakage? Will you be able to insure these units against damage? I've dropped a few color changers in my time. They tend to just keep running or are easily and quickly fixed. Strings are easily replaced at the last minute if someone notices a burn-through or a separation beginning. I can't imagine that replacing cracked/smashed dichroic filters is going to be cheap, easy, or quick. Cris Dopher, LD ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" Subject: RE: Equipment Opinions Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:40:04 -0400 Message-ID: <000601c58ef5$2cd44e10$6801a8c0 [at] Dell> In-Reply-To: > Speaking as an LD, I'd rather have eight=20 > scrollers than two dichroic units on any given show! Sometimes. It depends on the scrolls. I recently did a dance show with scrollers on all the head-highs, shins, = and backlights, with, maybe, 4 colors that I'd even *consider* using...and = of course there was no budget 30-40 new scrolls. In that case, I'd rather have static-gelled everything and had two = dichroic units to us for my CS special fronts and backs. ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: From: Stan Jensen Subject: Acoustically Transparent Projection Material? Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:32:58 -0400 A colleague asked me to make a recommendation for the best material for front projection (only ~3000 lumens) to hang in a church in front of the organ pipes. I could use some help here. Stan Jensen Central Michigan University Department of Speech Communication and Dramatic Art Moore 242 Mount Pleasant, MI 48859 (989) 774-1990 office (989) 774-2498 fax ------------------------------ Message-ID: <1924.64.28.50.204.1122083026.squirrel [at] webmail.peak.org> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:43:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: dmx lengths From: "Bill Nelson" >>"Recommended Practice for DMX512" says 1km (3281') is the max. The book >> also says 500m (1640') is prudent for the maximum. Use a splitter = >> beyond that. >> > Well, well, I'm really surprised to hear that. In all the stadium shows > I've done we have used splitters for anything over 100 m. If I recall correctly, it is recommended that 20 gauge or larger well shielded cable is recommended for runs of over 100 feet. On the other hand, I recently had a gig where I had a 150 foot run of 24 gauge microphone cable to the first portable dimmer pack, then 50 foot runs between the other 3 packs. There were no flicker or other interference problems at all. These packs were all feedthrough, so there was no regeneration of the signal by the packs. Bill ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 22:50:18 -0400 Subject: Re: Acoustically Transparent Projection Material? From: Bruce Purdy Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Stan Jensen asked: > A colleague asked me to make a recommendation for the best material for > front projection (only ~3000 lumens) to hang in a church in front of > the organ pipes. > Sounds like you want movie screen material as used in commercial cinemas. It is designed for front projection, and is acoustically transparent. These screens are full of perforations so small that the audience won't notice them, whilst letting the sound from the speakers (which are mounted behind the screen) easily pass through. Bruce -- Bruce Purdy Technical Director Smith Opera House ------------------------------ End of Stagecraft Digest #466 *****************************