Return-Path: X-Scanned-By: RAE MPP/Clamd http://raeinternet.com/mpp X-Scanned-By: This message was scanned by MPP Lite Edition (www.messagepartners.com)! X-Real-To: stagecraftlist [at] theatrical.net Received: by prxy.net (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.2.10) with PIPE id 24161174; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 03:01:42 -0700 X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 4.2.10 List-Unsubscribe: List-ID: Message-ID: From: "Stagecraft" Sender: "Stagecraft" To: "Stagecraft" Precedence: list Subject: Stagecraft Digest #485 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 03:01:31 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on prxy.net X-TFF-CGPSA-Version: 1.4f2 X-prxy-Spam-Filter: Scanned For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- Stagecraft Digest, Issue #485 1. Re: RGB lighting by "Nigel Worsley" 2. Re: Gripples by "richard j. archer" 3. Re: Gripples by Jerry Durand 4. Re: Gripples by "Immel,Patrick" 5. Re: Gripples by Dale Farmer 6. Re: Gripples by Delbert Hall 7. Re: Metal fume fever (was RE: gripples) by "Paul Schreiner" 8. Audio Power Sequencer by "Matthew Breton" 9. Re: cellphone gas ignition by Stuart Wheaton 10. Re: Audio Power Sequencer by "Tony Deeming" 11. Re: Audio Power Sequencer by rwhitco [at] comcast.net 12. Re: Audio Power Sequencer by "Warmbold, Bo" 13. Re: Audio Power Sequencer by "Jason Cowperthwaite" 14. Re: Audio Power Sequencer by "Matthew Breton" 15. Re: Audio Power Sequencer by MissWisc [at] aol.com 16. Re: Audio Power Sequencer by "Tony Deeming" *** Please update the subject line of your reply to use the subject *** line of the message you are replying to! Please only reply to *** one message subject in each reply. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message-ID: <029801c59da9$13fb5740$0e00a8c0 [at] Nogle> From: "Nigel Worsley" References: Subject: Re: RGB lighting Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:42:58 +0100 "Dale Farmer" wrote: > Electronics products weekly has a DLP developers kit listed. > No price, of course, meaning it will be not cheap. > http://electronicproducts.com/ShowPage.asp?SECTION=3700&PRIMID=&FileName=hlap01.oct2005.html Following the links to the supplier's website gives a price of $10,000 for the complete kit or $2,700 for the chipset. Far cheaper to buy a projector and pull it apart! Nigel Worsley ------------------------------ Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:35:10 -0500 From: "richard j. archer" Subject: Re: Gripples For those of you who use "Gripples" or a similar device: Take a look at Ductmate Industries "Clutcher" which conforms to new Intl. Code Council seismic guidelines (it's market is for static HVAC , electrical and plumbing applications) http://www.ductmate.com/products/clutcher.asp Dick Archer TD, Cornell U ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: From: Jerry Durand Subject: Re: Gripples Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:50:41 -0700 On Aug 10, 2005, at 8:35 AM, richard j. archer wrote: > For those of you who use "Gripples" or a similar device: Take a > look at Ductmate Industries "Clutcher" which conforms to new Intl. > Code Council seismic guidelines (it's market is for static HVAC , > electrical and plumbing applications) > > http://www.ductmate.com/products/clutcher.asp I don't think I've ever seen an MSDS for a clamp before. I see the main hazard is from breathing the fumes or dust from the clamp (fumes? dust?), but you should also wash your hands after touching it. ------------------------------ Message-ID: <147CF8DFB9C5D41187300001FA7EE390244ACC14 [at] mail.nwmissouri.edu> From: "Immel,Patrick" Subject: RE: Gripples Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:17:38 -0500 -----Original Message----- From: Jerry Durand To: Stagecraft Sent: 8/10/2005 10:50 AM Subject: Re: Gripples >I don't think I've ever seen an MSDS for a clamp before. I see the >main hazard is from breathing the fumes or dust from the clamp >(fumes? dust?), but you should also wash your hands after touching it. Interesting product. But "Metal fumes fever"? I've had "Cat Scratch Fever" and "Saturday Night Fever", but never MFF! Getting back into the world after a Summer "off"! pat immel Northwest Missouri State University ------------------------------ Message-ID: <42FA2B98.A3C2185D [at] cybercom.net> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:30:16 -0400 From: Dale Farmer Organization: The fuzz in the back of the fridge. Subject: Re: Gripples References: "Immel,Patrick" wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerry Durand > To: Stagecraft > Sent: 8/10/2005 10:50 AM > Subject: Re: Gripples > > >I don't think I've ever seen an MSDS for a clamp before. I see the > >main hazard is from breathing the fumes or dust from the clamp > >(fumes? dust?), but you should also wash your hands after touching it. > > Interesting product. But "Metal fumes fever"? I've had "Cat Scratch Fever" > and "Saturday Night Fever", but never MFF! > > Getting back into the world after a Summer "off"! Metal fumes fever is something welders get. Usually it is from welding something that has been zinc plated (galvanized) with insufficient ventilation. The vaporized zinc when enough is inhaled will cause a fever. Other metals pose similar risks. This is usually for production welders, who are welding for a full day of work, five or six days a week. Using these things with galvanized cable will likely release a superfine dust of zinc which could pose a similar hazard. --Dale ------------------------------ Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:49:56 -0400 From: Delbert Hall Subject: Re: Gripples In-Reply-To: References: Ductmate says that you must use Ductmate wire rope to get the specified ratings for the Clutcher. They do not seem to give any specs on the diameter of their wire rope. Ductmate's WR20, which comes in both 7x7 and 7x19 constructions, has a BS of 1699 lbs., which would be slightly less than the 2000 BS of a 1/8" diameter GAC. This leads me to believe that the Clutcher is designer for a metric sized wire rope. Too bad, it sounds like a pretty good piece of hardware. -Delbert --=20 Delbert Hall Phone: 423-773-4255 ------------------------------ Subject: RE: Metal fume fever (was RE: gripples) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:28:06 -0400 Message-ID: <6E497ADB607656479C24E6D7BF6B505A0196C8B4 [at] exchange.rmwc.edu> From: "Paul Schreiner" > > Interesting product. But "Metal fumes fever"? I've had=20 > "Cat Scratch=20 > > Fever" and "Saturday Night Fever", but never MFF! >=20 > Metal fumes fever is something welders get. Usually it=20 > is from welding something that has been zinc plated=20 > (galvanized) with insufficient ventilation. The vaporized=20 > zinc when enough is inhaled will cause a fever. Other metals=20 > pose similar risks. This is usually for production welders,=20 > who are welding for a full day of work, five or six days a=20 > week. Using these things with galvanized cable will likely=20 > release a superfine dust of zinc which could pose a similar hazard. Having done a fair amount of galvanized welding on past projects, I can add that it's not the superfine zinc dust that causes metal fume fever, but vaporized zinc oxide. It's almost like an allergic reaction to the ZnO, in that if you are working with it for an extended length of days your body acclimates itself to the presence of the fumes, and one usually only suffers from the fever after the first day or two of welding. Symptoms are basically identical to those of the flu, with a low-grade fever, fatigue, and general achiness being the most predominant. It goes away in about 24 hours, and there's been no long-term ill effects discovered or described in any of the literature. ------------------------------ Message-ID: In-Reply-To: From: "Matthew Breton" Subject: Audio Power Sequencer Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:02:53 -0400 Hi all, I'm looking to get a power sequencer for my audio equipment. It would turn speakers, amps, mixers, etc. on and off in the proper sequence. My research has only come up with one model, by Furman, and fairly expensive at that. Does anyone have a particular favorite? (Chris Babbie?) Thanks, -- Matt ======== _________________________________________________________________ Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ ------------------------------ Message-ID: <42FA7AD6.2090505 [at] fuse.net> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:08:22 -0400 From: Stuart Wheaton Subject: Re: cellphone gas ignition References: In-Reply-To: Steve Larson wrote: > Better yet, ban gas. That will really > screw up the oil companies, the Arab > States, and a lot more. > A nice idea, but a compromise is probably gonna be needed... We could just double the CAFE standards and cut the risk over time in half! Stuart ------------------------------ From: "Tony Deeming" Subject: RE: Audio Power Sequencer Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:27:22 +0100 Message-ID: In-reply-to: > -----Original Message----- > From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net]On Behalf Of Matthew > Breton > Sent: 10 August 2005 23:03 > To: Stagecraft > Subject: Audio Power Sequencer > > > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > Hi all, > > I'm looking to get a power sequencer for my audio equipment. It > would turn > speakers, amps, mixers, etc. on and off in the proper sequence. > > My research has only come up with one model, by Furman, and > fairly expensive > at that. Does anyone have a particular favorite? (Chris Babbie?) > > Thanks, > > > -- Matt This may sound like an awful daft question, but is there a particular reason why you'd want to have an auto-sequenced power module? I mean, I know that there IS a correct sequence to turning on audio gear, and that some items are far more critical than others, but is this really a justifiable expense, or a 'toy' that you can really do without? Are you the only guy that will use the gear? If so, YOU know which order to switch on. If not, wouldn't it be simpler/cheaper to clearly label the items in order? To me, I'd have thought there would be other more useful investments to make..... Just a thought. TD ------------------------------ From: rwhitco [at] comcast.net Subject: Re: Audio Power Sequencer Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:28:39 +0000 Message-Id: <081020052228.19172.42FA7F96000F40B700004AE42206424413010C9B0708999D [at] comcast.net> We've had the Furman power ports in our system for 9 years now. They've been working great. It's nice to be able to just turn a key to turn the system on and off especially since my amps are located above the stage. The drawback is that my students don't pick up the first on- last off concept as easily as if they had to do it themselves. A fun story related to these: One day at the end of a show my tech was speaking to a friend as the audience was leaving. While they were talking the mixer and outboard rack shut off. The friend asked what happened since he didn't see the tech do any thing. Patrick explained that when we book a group we charge them by the minute and ask them how long the show will be then we set the sound system on a timer. The guy was impressed at how close we had timed the show. Randy Whitcomb, TD Price Civic Aud. Loveland, CO. > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > Hi all, > > I'm looking to get a power sequencer for my audio equipment. It would turn > speakers, amps, mixers, etc. on and off in the proper sequence. > > My research has only come up with one model, by Furman, and fairly expensive > at that. Does anyone have a particular favorite? (Chris Babbie?) > > Thanks, > > > -- Matt > > ======== > > _________________________________________________________________ > Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! > http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ > ------------------------------ Subject: RE: Audio Power Sequencer Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:50:41 -0500 Message-ID: <4712A45C0680F445A48DEE8E91F9F7D602EF680A [at] LHEXCHANGE.hs.district128.org> From: "Warmbold, Bo" Atlas Sound makes one that we use is a couple of our facilities. http://www.atlassound.com/mpGroups/more.cfm=20 Bo Warmbold Vernon Hills High School -----Original Message----- From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Breton Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 5:03 PM To: Stagecraft Subject: Audio Power Sequencer For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- Hi all, I'm looking to get a power sequencer for my audio equipment. It would turn speakers, amps, mixers, etc. on and off in the proper sequence. My research has only come up with one model, by Furman, and fairly expensive at that. Does anyone have a particular favorite? (Chris Babbie?) Thanks, -- Matt =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D _________________________________________________________________ Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!=20 http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ ------------------------------ Message-ID: From: "Jason Cowperthwaite" Subject: RE: Audio Power Sequencer Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:42:47 -0400 Middle atlantic products makes a system. The installation that i have seen has been used over the past 2 years without major incedent, and was pretty easy to expand. Not sure of the prices though. And I am a big fan of power sequencers... especially in an educational setting when you dont have 100% control over who is turning the system on and off. www.middleatlantic.com Jason Cowperthwaite >From: "Matthew Breton" Reply-To: "Stagecraft" To: "Stagecraft" Subject: >Audio Power Sequencer Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:02:53 -0400 > >For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > >--------------------------------------------------- > >Hi all, > >I'm looking to get a power sequencer for my audio equipment. It would turn >speakers, amps, mixers, etc. on and off in the proper sequence. > >My research has only come up with one model, by Furman, and fairly >expensive at that. Does anyone have a particular favorite? (Chris Babbie?) > >Thanks, > > >-- Matt > >======== > >_________________________________________________________________ Don’t >just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! >http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ > _________________________________________________________________ On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement ------------------------------ Message-ID: In-Reply-To: From: "Matthew Breton" Subject: Re: Audio Power Sequencer Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:55:17 -0400 >This may sound like an awful daft question, but is there a particular >reason >why you'd want to have an auto-sequenced power module? I deal with a lot of students and interns. While I try and be involved at the start of every show, I can't be in the theater 24/7. (Been there, done that.) And while I've posted notices on colorful paper and in large print, several individuals have made it clear that reading is a skill which surpasses their capacity. So, yes: I'd like to get a system that makes it fairly foolproof. Over the course of several years, the cost of the power sequencer is less than the cost of replacing speaker cones and amplifiers. And it's nice to not hear a loud "pop" every time someone else sits behind the board. If I hadn't already got a fairly decent working system (wireless and handheld mics galore), I'd be concentrating on building up my inventory. Since I'm already close to where I want to be, I can look at nice shiny toys for a change. Now, when I finally have enough in the lighting budget to trade out those last ghastly PAR cans for a Source Four ..... -- Matt ======== _________________________________________________________________ Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ ------------------------------ From: MissWisc [at] aol.com Message-ID: <1dd.42f992a6.302c091e [at] aol.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:51:26 EDT Subject: Re: Audio Power Sequencer In a message dated 8/10/2005 7:55:49 PM Central Daylight Time, theatricalmatt [at] hotmail.com writes: <> Matt - The crux of it is this: No one who has not been trained and tested in writing (and hands-on) should be touching any of your equipment. PERIOD. This is for your safety as well as theirs... and, as you have already found out, for the well-being of the equipment. Test need not be fancy, just needs to show that the operator knows how to safely work with the equipment. Save that test as proof that you did check out the operator. Powering down a sound system is not difficult, it's a fundamental skill of operating the system. If there is no one competent to safely operate the equipment, it should be locked up. Add another thing and it's one more component for them to mess up. :) Kristi ------------------------------ From: "Tony Deeming" Subject: RE: Audio Power Sequencer Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:18:53 +0100 Message-ID: In-reply-to: > -----Original Message----- > From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net]On Behalf Of Matthew > Breton > Sent: 11 August 2005 01:55 > To: Stagecraft > Subject: Re: Audio Power Sequencer > > > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > >This may sound like an awful daft question, but is there a particular > >reason > >why you'd want to have an auto-sequenced power module? > > I deal with a lot of students and interns. While I try and be involved at > the start of every show, I can't be in the theater 24/7. (Been > there, done > that.) And while I've posted notices on colorful paper and in > large print, > several individuals have made it clear that reading is a skill which > surpasses their capacity. > > So, yes: I'd like to get a system that makes it fairly foolproof. > Over the > course of several years, the cost of the power sequencer is less than the > cost of replacing speaker cones and amplifiers. And it's nice to > not hear a > loud "pop" every time someone else sits behind the board. > > If I hadn't already got a fairly decent working system (wireless and > handheld mics galore), I'd be concentrating on building up my inventory. > Since I'm already close to where I want to be, I can look at nice > shiny toys > for a change. > > Now, when I finally have enough in the lighting budget to trade out those > last ghastly PAR cans for a Source Four ..... > > > -- Matt > OK - Point understood & accepted! 8-)) TD ------------------------------ End of Stagecraft Digest #485 *****************************