Return-Path: X-Scanned-By: RAE MPP/Clamd http://raeinternet.com/mpp X-Scanned-By: This message was scanned by MPP Lite Edition (www.messagepartners.com)! X-Real-To: stagecraftlist [at] theatrical.net Received: by prxy.net (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.2.10) with PIPE id 30888858; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 03:01:33 -0700 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on localhost X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=ADVANCE_FEE_1,AWL,BAYES_00, NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS,SARE_MILLIONSOF autolearn=no version=3.1.1 X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 4.2.10 List-Unsubscribe: List-ID: Message-ID: From: "Stagecraft" Sender: "Stagecraft" To: "Stagecraft" Precedence: list Subject: Stagecraft Digest #834 Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 03:00:15 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline X-TFF-CGPSA-Version: 1.4 X-prxy-Spam-Filter: Scanned For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- Stagecraft Digest, Issue #834 1. Re: American Flag (meaning) by "Tony Deeming" 2. Re: Bellagio fountains recreated by "Tony Deeming" 3. Re: VW Lighting Symbols by "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" 4. Re: Shop Floor by "Paul Guncheon" 5. OT: Rosetta [at] home by John McKernon 6. Re: Rosetta [at] home by "chrisharris25" 7. Re: Powering sound equipment off a generator by "Mt. Angel Performing Arts Center" 8. Re: OT: New Cast Member Announcement by "Peter Scheu" 9. Re: Rosetta [at] home by "Paul Schreiner" 10. Re: New Cast Member Announcement by 11. Re: OT: New Cast Member Announcement by "Scott Parker" 12. That flag thred once more by b Ricie 13. Re: Powering sound equipment off a generator by "Salvatori, Jason" 14. Re: Bellagio fountains recreated by "chip.a.wood" 15. Re: That flag thread, once more by "Bill Nelson" 16. Re: That flag thread, once more by "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" 17. Re: Bellagio fountains recreated by "Salvatori, Jason" 18. Re: Bellagio fountains recreated by Mark O'Brien 19. Re: Shop Floor by Michael Heinicke 20. Re: VW Lighting Symbols by greggx4 [at] mac.com 21. Re: Rigging question by "Donald A Rowe" 22. Re: audio from a generator by Steven Hood 23. Re: audio from a generator by Mark O'Brien 24. What's in the fridge by Paul Marsland 25. Re: Powering sound equipment off a generator by Brian James 26. (no subject) by Pgl87 [at] aol.com 27. Re: (no subject) by "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" 28. OT: DIY Office Supply Trebuchet by "Andy Leviss" 29. Re: American Flag by CB 30. Re: OT: New Cast Member Announcement by CB 31. Re: OT: New Cast Member Announcement by Stephen Litterst 32. Re: Semper fi by CB 33. Re: Semper fi by CB 34. Re: Semper fi by CB 35. Re: Semper fi by Jerry Durand 36. Re: Semper fi by "chip.a.wood" 37. Powering sound equipment off a generator by CB 38. Re: ABTT Engineering Conf. by "Will Hill" 39. That flag thread, once more by CB 40. Re: audio from a generator by "Occy" 41. Re: audio from a generator by Clive Mitchell 42. Re: audio from a generator by Jerry Durand 43. Semper Fi corrections by "Richard Wolpert" 44. Re: Semper fi by "Michael Powers" 45. Re: That flag thread, once more by "chip.a.wood" 46. Forever Plaid Costumes by Rick Malone 47. Re: Forever Plaid Costumes by Mark O'Brien 48. Re: Rosetta [at] home by NODEraser 49. Re: Powering sound equipment off a generator by "Jeffrey Mulvey" 50. Re: That flag thred once more by NODEraser 51. Re: audio from a generator by NODEraser 52. Re: Rigging question by Bill Sapsis 53. Re: ABTT Engineering Conf. by Bill Sapsis 54. Re: Rigging question by MissWisc [at] aol.com 55. Re: Rigging question by "Occy" 56. Different Rigging question by "Phil Blackwood" 57. Re: Semper Fi corrections by "Paul Puppo" 58. Re: Different Rigging question by "Occy" 59. Re: Different Rigging question by "Phil Blackwood" 60. Re: textbooks and CADD by "Jeffrey Mulvey" 61. Re: textbooks and CADD by Brian James 62. Re: Semper Fi corrections by "Bill Nelson" 63. Re: Different Rigging question by "Bill Nelson" *** Please update the subject line of your reply to use the subject *** line of the message you are replying to! Please only reply to *** one message subject in each reply. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Tony Deeming" Subject: RE: American Flag (meaning) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:11:37 +0100 Message-ID: In-reply-to: Hmmm..... I think I may regret this, BUT in an attempt to defuse any potential flaming before I start let me say that what I'm about to say is intended as a calm, collected observation from the right side of the pond of what MAY OR MAY NOT be your typical US citizen. So... (pulls on asbestos boots & jumps.....) OK, most Americans are patriotic - to varying degrees. So, I would say, are most Brits. OK - the US flag is a symbol which by indoctrination from early childhood is instilled as the symbol to end all symbols in the US. 'Merkins are proud of that flag, you have songs about it. We, in Britain are ALSO fiercely proud of the Union Jack (note also the similar word 'Union' there...!), and are protective of it, and yes, we even have songs about it. Our two nations, whilst differing greatly in size, have always had this 'love-hate' or 'special relationship' but in many ways are more similar than some might envisage.... In the last few centuries, the Brits set about colonising a huge empire, which in it's heyday I suspect may have been even bigger than the US, and in fact (till 1776 of course) included a goodly portion of the Americas. But looking at the progress of North America since the very start, the 'invaders' of the New World effectively colonised the continent in much the same way as the Brits did elsewhere. Back at the flags.... To say that we Brits might not be able to appreciate the love of flag and country is, to be honest, a little insulting. After all, we've been 'at it' for quite a few hundred years longer, and our traditions go way deeper than many. But whilst we do indeed revere the flag as a symbol, we seem to have a broader sense of what it is - in that it is indeed JUST a symbol. (so here's where I get flamed, I suppose!!) The flag can and does represent the sense of nation, both here and across the pond, but isn't it in truth the PEOPLE who should embody the spirit of what those flags stand for? We too have fought battles, again many many of which were fought before the US was even conceived, and millions of men & women have died serving our Union Flag. I can't recall that many conflicts over the past hundred years where the Americans haven't fought alongside the Brits (and others) and died there too, so we all have the same national memories of pride and loss, depending on the outcomes. By all means, the nation's colours are to be respected in all things official, but what about individuals? If an individual feels that the flag, for him/her represents all that is good & righteous in their country, then great - I have absolutely no problem with that - I'd certainly even encourage it if needs be. And there are those in the UK who do just that. But where we Brits might seem a little over-awed is in the fact that there's a whole US Code devoted to the rights & wrongs of flag worship, which seems to elevate that piece of cloth to almost deific status by law. We love our flags here in the UK - you've only had to look out of your window or down the street for weeks now, and for several weeks to come to see that - People hanging the cross of St George from their bedroom windows, flying them from small plastic sticks attached to car windows, painting their faces red & white, having the cross dyed into shaven hair.... Why? Because of a small thing called the World Cup. We, and other nations, display our national pride for the rest of the world to see - and do we feel that the way that these flags are used is disrespectful in any way? No. Because how one uses the symbol depends entirely upon the context in every case. Would we accept an act of burning a Union Flag in protest (it has happened) as acceptable behaviour? No again. But depending on the context of who, when and why the protest was being made may affect the way we deal with it. I have to take a little issue with Kristi's comment about our pomp & ceremony - sorry, but it's NOT just about the monarchy, although the monarchy sometimes heads up the 'guest list'. The monarch, as a figurehead, is simply the focal point of some of the big events, and it's a job they do exceedingly well. But the reasons for those ceremonies are oft-times rooted in outward displays of national pride - very MUCH by the people for the people! I will say that there may not be as much national pride as there used to be in an institutional base, but nevertheless it is there bubbling under the surface. As a lad, I regular attended church parades with the Scouts, and the turnout to the major events was great - each of the different youth groups had their own colours, and carried them proudly in front of their marching colleagues, with many also fielding a Union Flag as well. Anyway, what was intended as a brief response has ended up as a bit of a rant, so apologies. I'm off now to check Ebay for a second hand (hopefully unused) Nomex suit and a concrete bunker!! TD > ------------------------------ From: "Tony Deeming" Subject: RE: Bellagio fountains recreated Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:12:30 +0100 Message-ID: In-reply-to: WOW!! I loved this! Thanks Herrick > -----Original Message----- > From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net]On Behalf Of Herrick > Goldman > Sent: 05 June 2006 03:51 > To: Stagecraft > Subject: Bellagio fountains recreated > > > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > With Mentos and Diet coke. > > http://eepybird.com/dcm1.html > > Yeah we like these guys. > > -- > Herrick Goldman > Lighting Designer, NYC > www.HGLightingDesign.com > 917-797-3624 > "To the scores of silent alchemists who wreak their joy in darkness and in > light bringing magic to life, we bow most humbly. "-CDS > > > ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" Subject: RE: VW Lighting Symbols Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 06:25:17 -0400 Message-ID: <002001c6888a$577eccf0$6501a8c0 [at] Dell> In-Reply-To: > Nice spectra par cheat sheet! I'll use it this week. Thanks for the kind words. I've been meaning to add more colors, so if you have any suggestions, I'm happy to add them. ------------------------------ Message-ID: <001701c6889d$4a7bace0$0202a8c0 [at] HUNKACRAP> From: "Paul Guncheon" References: Subject: Re: Shop Floor Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 02:40:55 -1000 <> You've just described an accident waiting to happen. It seems to me it would be prudent to remedy the situation before he accident happens. Listen to the inner voice. I know it sounds kind of new age mystical, but it has been my experience that something tells me there is going to be an accident, or something is wrong in what I or someone else around me is doing, ever so slightly before said accident happens. I have learned to pay attention to that "voice", or at least try to hear it. Thirty years building scenery and never been seriously hurt (looking for wood)... if you exclude a couple of torn up shoulders and a seriously bad back... but those are simply from wear and tear. Laters, Paul ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 08:51:42 -0400 Subject: OT: Rosetta [at] home From: John McKernon Message-ID: Dear friends, I just saw an article about Rosetta [at] home on the Earthlink start page, and it sounds like a really worthy thing to get involved in - it's like the SETI project, but aimed at discovering cures for things like cancer and AIDS. It can be used with Windows, Mac OSX, and Linux. When your computer is idle, it figures out how an individual protein might fold or contort. When it's done crunching, it sends the results back to the Rosetta [at] home computers and grabs more work. Point your web browser at http://tinyurl.com/97x7c or directly at http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/ for more information. I now return you to the on-topic world of flag discussions...;) - John ------------------------------ Message-ID: <008f01c6889f$f565b9a0$1401a8c0 [at] chris> Reply-To: "chrisharris25" From: "chrisharris25" References: Subject: Re: Rosetta [at] home Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:00:01 -0400 I've been running this and the Predictor project (both run by the same BOINC software) for awhile. I figure if it helps, why not? With cable internet access at home, I let the computer do its thing overnight! Chris Harris Sapsis Rigging, Inc. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 06:46:49 -0700 From: "Mt. Angel Performing Arts Center" Subject: Re: Powering sound equipment off a generator In-reply-to: Message-id: <448435C9.3050903 [at] mtangelperformingarts.com> References: Jeffrey Mulvey wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > A small, regional, not-for-profit performing group is, once again, > singing in the local 4th of July parade. However, this time, instead > of singing in the back of the supplied city truck with the small, 2 > mic sound system powered off of the truck, the board of directors has > decided to use our own trailer and sound system. > > Trailer and generator provided by a board member. We're going to use > the group's already assembled sound system. > > System is: > 250 watt stereo amp > Mackie CFX 12 mixer (powered) > Denon cd/tape deck (powered) > 5 Audio Technica Wireless Mics (3000 Series) > > Having never powered a sound system off of a generator, I have several > questions and don't know where exactly to go for answers. > > A) Is this even possible? Yes, certainly - we do it all the time. Since this is a new setup for you, try everything out under actual parade conditions prior to the event. See caveats below. > B) How do I figure out how much power the system needs? From the equipment list, it looks like your load will be less than 1500 watts. To be sure, add up the nameplate wattage on all the equipment you're powering. > C) What do I need to know about the generator? Not much other than assuring yourself that its rated power output is greater than your peak power requirements. > D) Do I need to be concerned about the generator harming the equipment? Probably not. The generator output (I'm presuming the gennie involved will be one of the little cheapie camping or home standby units) is probably pretty dirty - but your sound equipment is transformer isolated so not much will be a problem. There'll be 120 Hz electrical noise and harmonics all over the place from the generator if it's like what we use, so the power transformers will get a bit warmer than usual - no biggie. If the wireless receivers are susceptible to impulse interference, that will be a problem with a low-end generator. Test before parade day. If you are using the tape side of the tape/CD player, check in advance to be sure its motor is DC/servo controlled. If the tape motor is power-line locked there's be unacceptable speed variations as the generator hunts around for 60 Hz. Use the CD side if possible, and cassette tape only as a last resort. Be sure the generator is reasonably quiet. It's going to be spinning at 3600 rpm and making a racket, so a good muffler is a requirement. You didn't mention speakers (unless that Mackie board has them integrated) - Outdoor PA sucks up sound energy so be sure you have adequate speakers for the job. On the other hand, parades are noisy beasts so a bit of distortion and/or noise in the PA output and some generator/mechanical noise will be mostly unnoticed. Also, what you're using is an alternator, not a generator... but nobody calls them that... Carla ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "Peter Scheu" Subject: RE: OT: New Cast Member Announcement Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:46:40 -0400 Organization: Scheu Consulting Services, Inc. Message-ID: In-reply-to: Thanks to everyone for all your good wishes. It means a lot. I may no longer have any free time, but I can think of no better way to = fill it. =20 Regards to all, Peter Scheu =20 Scheu Consulting Services, Inc. Syracuse, NY www.scheuconsulting.com ------------------------------ Subject: RE: Rosetta [at] home Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:51:49 -0400 Message-ID: <6E497ADB607656479C24E6D7BF6B505A042A9C9A [at] exchange.rmwc.edu> From: "Paul Schreiner" I've been a SETI [at] Home user for about six years now (both home and work computers), and added Rosetta about a year ago when they switched SETI over to the BOINC software. It's remarkably inobtrusive... ------------------------------ Subject: RE: New Cast Member Announcement Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:56:30 -0400 Message-ID: From: Cc: peter [at] scheuconsulting.com Congratulations and Best Wishes to the whole family, Peter!! Best, Steve Rees, TD SUNY-Fredonia=20 -----Original Message----- From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net] On Behalf Of Peter Scheu Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 12:58 PM To: Stagecraft Subject: OT: New Cast Member Announcement For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- Betsy & Peter Scheu are proud (and exhausted) to announce the arrival of: Evan Alden Scheu B. May 31, 2006 4:30PM EST 8 lb 6 oz All involved are very, very, well. Thanks. Peter Scheu Scheu Consulting Services, Inc. Syracuse, NY ------------------------------ Message-ID: <90d9c9980606050722l7e26c192uc5acaa721d1bdd56 [at] mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 10:22:52 -0400 From: "Scott Parker" Cc: peter [at] scheuconsulting.com Subject: Re: OT: New Cast Member Announcement In-Reply-To: References: Hey there!!! That's my birthday too... Congratulations several times over. Long days and short years are ahead. My girl turns 4 in August and every day is filled with joy. Take care, Scott On 6/3/06, Peter Scheu wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > Betsy & Peter Scheu are proud (and exhausted) to announce the arrival of: > > Evan Alden Scheu > B. May 31, 2006 4:30PM EST > 8 lb 6 oz > > All involved are very, very, well. > > Thanks. > > Peter Scheu > > Scheu Consulting Services, Inc. > Syracuse, NY > > -- Thanks and take care, Scott Scott C. Parker Professor/Technical Director Dept. of Performing Arts Dyson College of Arts and Sciences [at] Pace University Office/shipping: 41 Park Row, 1205F Mailing: 1 Pace Plaza New York, NY 10038 212-346-1423 Fax: 914-989-8425 ------------------------------ Message-ID: <20060605144042.81569.qmail [at] web50615.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 07:40:42 -0700 (PDT) From: b Ricie Subject: That flag thred once more In-Reply-To: Thanks Bill, According to the goose bumps, I got it. This past Memorial Day I had the Betsey Ross flying from my truck. I was in a parking lot and a man in a truck backed up to tell me "I like that flag". I said "Thank You" He said "I fought for that flag". I said "I owe you another Thank you!" Brian Rice 508-685-0716 b_ricie [at] yahoo.com "Blessed are the cracked: For it is they who let in the light." __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Subject: RE: Powering sound equipment off a generator Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 10:45:11 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Salvatori, Jason" The last reply covered most of it. I'd just add that=20 you should have decent line noise suppression and surge=20 suppression on your gear - a Furman AR-15, Mid Atlantic, ETA, etc. to help protect the electronics from small spikes=20 you can get in the voltage. Jason _________________________________________________________________________= _ This e-mail, including any attachment(s), may be confidential and is = intended solely for the attention and information of the named = addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient or have received = this message in error, please notify me immediately by return e-mail and = permanently delete the original transmission from your computer, = including any attachment(s). Any unauthorized distribution, disclosure = or copying of this message and attachment(s) by anyone other than the = recipient is strictly prohibited. ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "chip.a.wood" Subject: RE: Bellagio fountains recreated Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 07:58:48 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: That was great and a lot more fun than Bellagio since we saw the crew doing the work. BTW, did anyone notice that the swinging bottles on the side did not go off as high or as long as the static bottles? Why would a mixing motion lessen the effect? . Chip > -----Original Message----- > From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net]On Behalf Of Tony > Deeming > > WOW!! > I loved this! > Thanks Herrick Herrick > > Goldman > > With Mentos and Diet coke. > > > > http://eepybird.com/dcm1.html > > > > Yeah we like these guys. > ------------------------------ Message-ID: <1820.205.215.254.64.1149519790.squirrel [at] webmail.peak.org> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: That flag thread, once more From: "Bill Nelson" > They don't even say it out loud. And I realize that the flag they are > holding to their chest was probably wrapped around the coffin that > brought their son or daughter home. > > And that's when I understand the symbolism of the flag. I can't > describe the feeling to you, but I get it. I agree, and I have very strong feelings about one particular flag myself. However, that flag is not one that may have been made in China and bought for $5.95 off the shelf in a variety store somewhere. If someone wants to burn the latter, so what? To me, there is a vast difference between the two flags. Bill ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" Subject: RE: That flag thread, once more Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:13:38 -0400 Message-ID: <004401c688b2$9f7f15a0$6501a8c0 [at] Dell> In-Reply-To: > To me, there is a vast difference between the two flags. ...But not in the core values that they both symbolize. ------------------------------ Subject: RE: Bellagio fountains recreated Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 11:37:20 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Salvatori, Jason" Cc: chip.wood [at] ieee.org >BTW, did anyone notice that the swinging bottles on the side did not go = off >as high or as long as the static bottles? Why would a mixing motion = lessen >the effect? . Just a guess, but maybe the swinging allows the pressure to escape = faster,=20 getting air pockets within the CO2 "geyser", lessening the effect. = Purely speculation, mind you. Jason _________________________________________________________________________= _ This e-mail, including any attachment(s), may be confidential and is = intended solely for the attention and information of the named = addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient or have received = this message in error, please notify me immediately by return e-mail and = permanently delete the original transmission from your computer, = including any attachment(s). Any unauthorized distribution, disclosure = or copying of this message and attachment(s) by anyone other than the = recipient is strictly prohibited. ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: Cc: marko [at] email.arizona.edu (Mark O'Brien) From: Mark O'Brien Subject: Re: Bellagio fountains recreated Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:47:10 -0700 > --------------------------------------------------- > >> BTW, did anyone notice that the swinging bottles on the side did >> not go off >> as high or as long as the static bottles? Why would a mixing >> motion lessen >> the effect? . > My guess would be that some of the energy produced by the reaction of the Diet Coke, and Mentos would be used up to swing the bottles. There is only a limited amount of energy produced, so if some energy is used to swing the bottles, the geysers would get shortchanged. My .02 Mark-O Mark O'Brien Opera Technical Director University of Arizona, School of Music Tucson, AZ 520/621-7025 520/591-1803 Mobile ------------------------------ Message-ID: <20060605155152.27285.qmail [at] web82203.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:51:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Heinicke Subject: Re: Shop Floor In-Reply-To: --- Paul Guncheon wrote: > Listen to the inner voice. > > I know it sounds kind of new age mystical, but it > has been my experience > that something tells me there is going to be an > accident, or something is > wrong in what I or someone else around me is doing, > ever so slightly before > said accident happens. I have learned to pay > attention to that "voice", or > at least try to hear it. You're not the only one that gets that voice. Unfortunately for me it usually speaks up just seconds before the accident. So far it hasn't been anything that a few stitches couldn't fix. I'll second to listen to that voice saying "Something is wrong!" Mike Heinicke ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: Reply-To: gregg hillmar From: greggx4 [at] mac.com Subject: Re: VW Lighting Symbols Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 12:10:20 -0400 You pay the airfare, I'll come do one for you. VBG! I do them all the time for USITT-chesapeake, or at whatever conference the Nemetschek folks visit... g. _____________________ gregg hillmar scenic & lighting design portfolio & life as we know it: http://www.hillmardesign.com "Work like you don't need the money. Love like you've never been hurt. Dance like no one's watching." Satchel Paige On Jun 4, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Jon Ares wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see stagecraft.theprices.net/> > --------------------------------------------------- > >> Cris Dopher >> ...giving presentation on Spotlight June 14th at Apple Store >> SoHo. Be there or be inverse squared. >> > > > Oh, how I wish someone (such as Chris) would hold a Vectorworks > seminar (or eight) on the west coast - preferably Portland or > Seattle.... for us that come from an AutoCad/QuickCad (and the > ilk) background..... > > - Jon Ares (that has only exploited Vectorworks v9 for light plots) > www.hevanet.com/acreative ------------------------------ Message-ID: <004301c688bc$1fc3e980$0201a8c0 [at] hsd1.pa.comcast.net> From: "Donald A Rowe" References: Subject: Re: Rigging question Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 12:21:39 -0400 In the situation(s) where I had the question the bridals were as follows: 2 legs: Split 15' Basket Pin Up on the open joint (made in the air) and pin down on the bottom, a 15' leg (10' & 5' pin up) to a pin down shackle for the 20' Down with a pin up shackle for the motor. Well I think that makes sense to me, 2 straight days of 16 hour rigging calls are wearing on me, the original hang called for 2 points outside the building. Why again do we bother sending advances to industrial shows? Donald A. Rowe IATSE Local #3 Pgh, Pa. 15202 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Idaho Scenic & Rigging" To: "Stagecraft" Cc: Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 12:49 AM Subject: Re: Rigging question > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > Pin should go to the motor as the general reference. The > "bottom" shackle, the one that sets into the bottom hook of > the motor, I usually do pin up as I have two spansets that > take up the bell of the shackle. From above, the steel > that comes off the basket is pin down, a joint (say a > fifteen leg consisting of a ten and five) would have the > pin down. In a "normal" bridle (call it two even legs with > a less than 60 degree spread) the pin would go up at the > bottom of each leg (apex) and the stinger would have the > shackle with pin down. The bells of the leg shackles set > into the bell of the stinger shackle. > > If I were to use a pear ring at the apex, the bridle leg > shackles would go pin down, through the pear. > > More confused? less confused? > > Glad to explain more. > > Rob't > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brian James" > To: "Stagecraft" > Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 10:17 PM > Subject: Re: Rigging question > > > > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > > > --------------------------------------------------- > > > > Why would you always want the pin down? I had always been > told that > > generally the "pin should go to the motor" for an > orientation. > > Idaho Scenic & Rigging wrote: > > > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > My policy: If the pin CAN go down, it should go down. > > > If I don't like the looks of an upside down shackle, for > > > whatever reason, a pear ring will be introduced. > > > > > > What part of the leg was it? basket, joint, apex? > > > All steel or spanset? Regular (concert) bridle, two leg > or > > > more? or inverted, > > > As always, more info needed. > > > > > > If he is a senior rigger he shouldn't mind telling you > his > > > thoughts on it. > > > If you ask him. > > > "No challenge... information please, so I may become > more > > > versed" > > > > > > Rob't > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Donald A Rowe" > > > > > >> I tried to look this up in the archives but got no > > >> > > > response so I'll ask the > > > > > >> list.... > > >> > > >> While on a rigging call I was told to put shackles in > the > > >> > > > bridal legs with > > > > > >> the pin up. I seem to remember that the pin should be > > >> > > > down ("the shackle > > > > > >> takes the weight"). Obviously if there is something in > > >> > > > the shackle that > > > > > >> could slide across the pin you would spin the shackle > but > > >> > > > before I go and > > > > > >> attempt to tell a senior rigger he is wrong I would > like > > >> > > > to have some more > > > > > >> information as to why/if I'm correct. So any examples > or > > >> > > > reasonings would > > > > > >> be great. Also I'm curious to see if people do this > > >> > > > differently. Thanks > > > > > >> Donald A. Rowe > > >> IATSE Local #3 > > >> Pgh, Pa. 15202 > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ Message-ID: <20060605163057.148.qmail [at] web34209.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:30:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Steven Hood Subject: Re: audio from a generator In-Reply-To: First off, I'd do some math on the gear itself and make sure that the total wattage of the gear isn't more than the genny itself is rated for... From the looks, you should be fine even with a little 1.8 kW unit, if they even come that small... Then, I'd go get a really nice power conditioner from either Furman or ETA (I think that's the right group) or the like... I don't know that you'll be able to ground to anything in this configuration, but small parade floats get rigged this way quite often, though I'd imagine the Rose Parade and that ilk are all wireless to someone alongside the route with a huge desk and wireless rig, all very well grounded... If you do ground your rig to the chassis of the trailer, make sure you only ground your system in one place... Beyond that, mix carefully... It'll be interesting... Anything I missed, Chris or John? Cheers, Steven TD, Regent Uni __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <1E719413-8E31-4AF5-A5CC-7D7ACC342A17 [at] email.arizona.edu> Cc: marko [at] email.arizona.edu (Mark O'Brien) From: Mark O'Brien Subject: Re: audio from a generator Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:40:20 -0700 I would use a generator from Honda that uses a inverter. They are whisper quiet, and the power that comes out of them is very clean. The cool thing about these are that one can link a couple together to get more wattage. http://www.hondapowerequipment.com/gensup.asp Mark-O Mark O'Brien Opera Technical Director University of Arizona, School of Music Tucson, AZ 520/621-7025 520/591-1803 Mobile ------------------------------ Message-ID: <20060605172546.87265.qmail [at] web52211.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 10:25:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Marsland Subject: What's in the fridge In-Reply-To: Hey Clive, I appreciate you more and more -- a Scrumpy Jack on you sir! Paul > > I'll stick to cider. It's very appley at any > temperature. > > -- > Clive Mitchell > http://www.bigclive.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Message-ID: <448469E3.9040106 [at] gmail.com> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:29:07 -0400 From: Brian James Reply-To: brianedwardjames [at] gmail.com Subject: Re: Powering sound equipment off a generator References: In-Reply-To: Start by figuring out you total loads, usually generators are rated in watts or Kilo watts. Once you know that you in goos shape. The URL http://www.aggreko.com/customerctr/Formulas-and-Calculations.asp Has some handy formulas that may be helpful. Yes you can run sound off of generators, I do it more than I care to admit to. However you need to be careful about a few things: 1) Frequency, we have had generators that have been significantly off the 60hz standard. 2) Voltage, some, especially the construction generators, can run VERY hot an are difficult at best to adjust. 3) If you size the generator wrong, they will toss an attitude at you if you load varies too much Make sure you ground the generator correctly, there are some specific requirements in the NEC for this. One of the most reputable companies I have worked with is Aggreko (the URL above), tell them what you need and they pretty much take care of it, for a price. Other companies that do one off power rentals are CAT and Prime Power. I have used CAT gear but nor Prime Power. The three companies listed usually carry generators that are specifically designed for entertainment use. If you have not played with a generator before, I would highly suggest you pay for a generator and an operator from a good company. I have seen or heard of many generators fail during shows. Usually, as best I can tell, they were "on the cheap" generators or not sized correctly. Hope this helps. Jeffrey Mulvey wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > A small, regional, not-for-profit performing group is, once again, > singing in the local 4th of July parade. However, this time, instead > of singing in the back of the supplied city truck with the small, 2 > mic sound system powered off of the truck, the board of directors has > decided to use our own trailer and sound system. > > Trailer and generator provided by a board member. We're going to use > the group's already assembled sound system. > > System is: > 250 watt stereo amp > Mackie CFX 12 mixer (powered) > Denon cd/tape deck (powered) > 5 Audio Technica Wireless Mics (3000 Series) > > Having never powered a sound system off of a generator, I have several > questions and don't know where exactly to go for answers. > > A) Is this even possible? > B) How do I figure out how much power the system needs? > C) What do I need to know about the generator? > D) Do I need to be concerned about the generator harming the equipment? > > This is a first for me. Any and all input would, as usual, be greatly > appreciated. > Thanks much. > Jeff Mulvey > ------------------------------ From: Pgl87 [at] aol.com Message-ID: <3b4.437e569.31b5cd8c [at] aol.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 14:10:20 EDT Subject: (no subject) Corporate American Beer sucks, but there are quite a few breweries that are in operation in this country (I think it has finally come of age?) now, and quite a few that would make any Brit feel right at home. Or German! Chris "Chris" Babbie Location Sound MON AZ I would like to point out a regional favorite in the Northeast and Also the Nation's Oldest Brewery. Yuengling opened in 1829 in Pottsville Pennsylvania and has been in constant ever since. They now operate three breweries in the Northeast and one in Florida while still maintaining the family feel and high product quality. http://www.yuengling.com/ ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" Subject: RE: (no subject) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 14:13:33 -0400 Message-ID: <005f01c688cb$c1df3fd0$6501a8c0 [at] Dell> In-Reply-To: > quite a few that > would make any Brit feel right at home. Or German! We have beers that would make any Brit feel German? ------------------------------ Message-ID: <003201c688ce$33848080$0601a8c0 [at] shop2> From: "Andy Leviss" Subject: OT: DIY Office Supply Trebuchet Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 14:31:02 -0400 So, I know we've had talks of building trebs here before...this isn't quite the "more power!" scale many of us love, but a bit more approachable for beginners, LOL: http://www.instructables.com/ex/i/535B13C242DD1029AC23001143E7E506/ ------------------------------ Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20060605131619.00c0b200 [at] pop.west.cox.net> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:16:19 From: CB Subject: RE: American Flag >That, coming from the mouth/fingers of a conservative... And then there was the part where I said, "Conservatives tend to" which was meant to indicate that this isn't necessarily true of all conservatives, just a tendency that I have notice; and "It ain't always the case", which was intended to include you, who doesn't chase the almighty buck. In that light, I think that this statement is not only incorrect, it is logically impossible! >Speaking for myself, you couldn't be more wrong... Also, conservatives have changed dramatically over the years since Reagan and McCarthy went liberal-hunting. I have quite a few conservative values, my-own-self, but they aren't parallel with the conservatives I hear on the radio today. I'm not sure that the lables are even valid anymore. ------------------------------ Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20060605134405.00c0b200 [at] pop.west.cox.net> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:44:05 From: CB Subject: Re: OT: New Cast Member Announcement >Betsy & Peter Scheu are proud (and exhausted) to announce the arrival of: > Evan Alden Scheu A whole new definition of the word awaits you, my brother! Congratz! Chris "Chris" Babbie Location Sound MON AZ Delete key training and post trimming done by appointment. Rates negotiable, will trade for typing lessons/ADD treatment... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 16:45:24 -0400 From: Stephen Litterst Subject: Re: OT: New Cast Member Announcement In-reply-to: Message-id: <448497E4.6050409 [at] ithaca.edu> References: Peter Scheu wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks to everyone for all your good wishes. It means a lot. > > I may no longer have any free time, but I can think of no better way to fill > it. Best Wishes to all of you. Steve L. -- Stephen Litterst Technical Supervisor Ithaca College, Theatre Arts 607.274.3947 slitterst [at] ithaca.edu ------------------------------ Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20060605135725.00c0b200 [at] pop.west.cox.net> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:57:25 From: CB Subject: Re: Semper fi >> Hey its rude to speak a foreign language in front of non-speakers... >Right, speaking a foreign language is totally anti-American. They >must be terrorists, send them off to a camp someplace. What? Latin!?! What did we do to the guy that posted the quote from Pres. Bartlett? Is he locked up somewhere? 'Semper Fi' is just slang for 'Semper Fidelis', or 'Always True'. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. CB ------------------------------ Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20060605135807.00c0b200 [at] pop.west.cox.net> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:58:07 From: CB Subject: Re: Semper fi >Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes. Or an old Catholic.. Chris "Chris" Babbie Location Sound MON AZ Delete key training and post trimming done by appointment. Rates negotiable, will trade for typing lessons/ADD treatment... ------------------------------ Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20060605135859.00c0b200 [at] pop.west.cox.net> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:58:59 From: CB Subject: Re: Semper fi >Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? I have been, but if you want to make it official, what's it pay? Chris "Chris" Babbie Location Sound MON AZ Delete key training and post trimming done by appointment. Rates negotiable, will trade for typing lessons/ADD treatment... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:54:21 -0700 From: Jerry Durand Subject: Re: Semper fi In-reply-to: Message-id: <7.0.1.0.0.20060605135120.01efbcb8 [at] interstellar.com> References: At 06:57 AM 6/5/2006, CB wrote: >What? Latin!?! What did we do to the guy that posted the quote from Pres. >Bartlett? Is he locked up somewhere? 'Semper Fi' is just slang for >'Semper Fidelis', or 'Always True'. > Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. > CB You must have missed the good-natured harassment in there someplace. The political guys are trying to make English our one and only official language and a requirement to not get deported. I was just poking at the fact that our own military uses Latin phrases and English happens to come from England, a foreign country! -- Jerry Durand, Durand Interstellar, Inc. www.interstellar.com 219 Oak Wood Way, Los Gatos, California 95032-2523 USA tel: +1 408 356-3886, USA toll free: 1 866 356-3886 Skype: jerrydurand ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "chip.a.wood" Subject: RE: Semper fi Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 14:02:10 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Can't get any more foreign than a language that is not spoken any more. We all know that those Romans were terrorists. Whupped ass on them Gauls and Brits. Chip > -----Original Message----- > From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net]On Behalf Of CB > >> Hey its rude to speak a foreign language in front of non-speakers... > > >Right, speaking a foreign language is totally anti-American. They > >must be terrorists, send them off to a camp someplace. > > > What? Latin!?! ------------------------------ Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20060605143733.00c0b200 [at] pop.west.cox.net> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:37:33 From: CB Subject: Powering sound equipment off a generator >250 watt stereo amp >Mackie CFX 12 mixer (powered) >Denon cd/tape deck (powered) >5 Audio Technica Wireless Mics (3000 Series) > >A) Is this even possible? >B) How do I figure out how much power the system needs? >C) What do I need to know about the generator? >D) Do I need to be concerned about the generator harming the equipment? First off, the term 'powered' usually meant that the mixer has an amp on-bard, and doesn't require an additional amp. IIRC, the Mackie in question is not 'powered' in this sense. In the sense that they will require AC, yeah, then I guess both the Mackie and the Denon are 'powered', but then so is the amp and the rxvr's for the wireless mics. BTW, why five wirelss mics? Wired mics are so much more dependable and require a whole lot less user knowledge. I'd think on a trailer there'd be almost nowhere to go... Anyhoo, you mention an amp at 250 watts, stereo. That's like saying you have a V-8 that'll do 40 MPH, and you want to know what kind of mileage you're gonna get. So, is this 250 W per side, or 125 W per side? IS this amp reated at 4 Ohms, or 8? Possibly 2? At 250W per side at 4 Ohms, I'd suggest you have a thousand watts available for the amp. A. Yep, completely possible, What kind of genny are you going to have? If you have a construction site genny (and old V-6 or a straight 4 kluged up to a generator), I'd think twice. A home generator, providing that it is properly cooled, rated for the continuous use you meant to put it through, grounded, and has the fuel capacity to do what it needs to do, hasw been reasonably or recently well maintained, it could work. Anyone that rents gennies for the entertainment industry specifically will be able to puyt you in touch with an adequate generator designed to be used in this manner, though. There are gennies used for film that are quiet, dependable, put out scads of juice, and cost a pretty penny to rent. You may also have to pay an operator. I've gotten away with not paying an op because I could demonstrate that I knew what the heck I was doing. B. Read the ID plate (usually next to the plug on the piece of gear) where it describes the kit. It'll say something like "115V - 60 Hz - 250 mW" or something similar. If you aren't capable of converting Milliwatts to amps, or amps to watts, it amy be safer to let someone else handle this. The kit that you describe could be done with a 4500W gennie, though. Anything that you add to that load is on you, and I won't take responsibility for it. Heck, what am I talking about? I'm not taking responsibility for any of this! ; > C. I think that I covered this. D. It is possible. There are varying levels of protectin builtinto generators, dbending on what they will be used for. The construction site gennie I described will not have much, if any. The film-use gennie will be designed to provide power to very expensive and esoteric kit in addition to lighting, so there will be quite a bit of protection built in. OTOH, none of the kit that you mentioned so far is that awful sensitive, and will tend to operate from 90V AC to 140 V. The frequency is going to be important, and oscillations in the operation of the gennie will affect the stability. Getting an expensive generator rental bill is always cheaper than getting an expensive repair/replacement bill. Chris "Chris" Babbie Location Sound MON AZ Delete key training and post trimming done by appointment. Rates negotiable, will trade for typing lessons/ADD treatment... ------------------------------ From: "Will Hill" Subject: RE: ABTT Engineering Conf. Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:30:49 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Scott, TEA Conference and ABTT show. I will be there for duration and also be Jolly at the Jolly Hotel. Let me know on or off list if any plans have been made. Look forward to meeting some list members in sunny London Town. Will Hill, Technical Manager, Theatre Royal Norwich, w.hill [at] theatreroyalnorwich.co.uk ------------------------------ Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20060605143858.00cbb348 [at] pop.west.cox.net> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:38:58 From: CB Subject: That flag thread, once more >And that's when I understand the symbolism of the flag. I can't describe >the feeling to you, but I get it. I'm not sure I can read the list anymore. The crying is taking a lot out of me. It ain't the flag, Bill, its the symbolism. If that couple had been clutching a pair of empty combat boots, you think you would have felt differently? I'll defend what that flag represents to the death, and I've made that promise in public. The flag itself, however, is just a piece of art, cause we can't print the feelings that you get on your bike on that ride. I know that feeling. I got it riding past a couple at the VietNam Vet Memorial in DC last month. Chris "Chris" Babbie Location Sound MON AZ Delete key training and post trimming done by appointment. Rates negotiable, will trade for typing lessons/ADD treatment... ------------------------------ Message-ID: From: "Occy" References: Subject: Re: audio from a generator Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 15:39:09 -0700 Everything been right up to grounding the gennie to the trailer/truck. Being that most likely the trailer/truck has rubber tires on it, it is isolated from earth ground. By bonding the gennie to chassis you now have created a path for current to flow. Also the electronics in truck may not like the gennie one bit. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Hood" > > First off, I'd do some math on the gear itself and > make sure that the total wattage of the gear isn't > more than the genny itself is rated for... From the > looks, you should be fine even with a little 1.8 kW > unit, if they even come that small... Then, I'd go get > a really nice power conditioner from either Furman or > ETA (I think that's the right group) or the like... I > don't know that you'll be able to ground to anything > in this configuration, but small parade floats get > rigged this way quite often, though I'd imagine the > Rose Parade and that ilk are all wireless to someone > alongside the route with a huge desk and wireless rig, > all very well grounded... If you do ground your rig to > the chassis of the trailer, make sure you only ground > your system in one place... > Beyond that, mix carefully... It'll be interesting... > Anything I missed, Chris or John? > Cheers, > Steven > TD, Regent Uni > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > ------------------------------ Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 00:08:08 +0100 From: Clive Mitchell Subject: Re: audio from a generator References: In-Reply-To: In message , Occy writes >Everything been right up to grounding the gennie to the trailer/truck. >Being that most likely the trailer/truck has rubber tires on it, it is >isolated from earth ground. By bonding the gennie to chassis you now >have created a path for current to flow. Also the electronics in truck >may not like the gennie one bit. If the gennies got it's output referenced to it's chassis then it must be bonded to the truck chassis and localised ground area with a spike or plate. It's all about preventing potential difference between ground, chassis or generator in the event of a fault. It bugs me when I see generators without their spikes or other grounding system being used. There have been some pretty sad accidents in the past when current has found a route via the ground back to the generator via people who simply reached up and grabbed the cab handle, climbed onto the truck or attempted to turn the generator off. -- Clive Mitchell http://www.bigclive.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 16:19:33 -0700 From: Jerry Durand Subject: Re: audio from a generator In-reply-to: Message-id: <7.0.1.0.0.20060605161906.01ebe3e0 [at] interstellar.com> References: At 04:08 PM 6/5/2006, Clive Mitchell wrote: >If the gennies got it's output referenced to it's chassis then it >must be bonded to the truck chassis and localised ground area with a >spike or plate. What do you do in the case of a float that's moving, can't hardly drive a spike in the road. -- Jerry Durand, Durand Interstellar, Inc. www.interstellar.com 219 Oak Wood Way, Los Gatos, California 95032-2523 USA tel: +1 408 356-3886, USA toll free: 1 866 356-3886 Skype: jerrydurand ------------------------------ From: "Richard Wolpert" Subject: Semper Fi corrections Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:30:06 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: I'm just a dumb former Jarhead, but in the interests of accuracy I had to respond. 1. Semper Fi = Semper Fidelis = Always Faithful. I don't know if it's the true Latin interpretation, but it's one of the first things you learn as a "boot". 2. Jarhead is one word. 3. Don't even get me started on sailors without a ship..... at least word the insult in proper terms. It should be "squids without a boat" 4. Camp Lejeune is not in France, even if many of us have been to Parris ( spelling correct ). Richard A.Wolpert President Union Connector Co., Inc. 40 Dale Street West Babylon, NY 11704 Ph: 631-753-9550 ext. 204 Fx: 631-753-9560 richw [at] unionconnector.com ------------------------------ Message-ID: <58f67b0f0606051648q4020fca1xf3445a1ee017170d [at] mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 18:48:47 -0500 From: "Michael Powers" Subject: Re: Re: Semper fi Jerry Durand Writes: > BTW, Aren't Marines just sailors without a ship? :) Boy! It's a good thing you've got a smiley there. Otherwise I'd have to do evil things to your body, beat you severely about the head and shoulders, kill you two or three times and THEN I'd have to hurt you! ;-) -- Michael Michael Powers Director of Operations Central Lighting & Equipment 1720 Fuller Rd. Suite 150 West Des Moines Iowa 50265 515-277-4190 877-977-4190 Fax 515-277-2295 515-557-0178 cell michael [at] clelights.com ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "chip.a.wood" Subject: RE: That flag thread, once more Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:44:10 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Speaking of feelings- Was on the DC Mall last month and decided to see the new WWII Memorial. Uck, what a hodge-podge collection of cliched crap. The families were yakking and wandering about eating ice cream cones, kids chasing each other, dunking their feet in the water, just generally giving it as much honor and dignity as a strip mall. Couldn't take it and went over to the Vietnam Memorial. Nobody was eating, chasing, but a lot of solemn people slowly walking (including the kids) maybe touching the wall once or twice. Even saw a few tears through mine. Sometimes it is the ART of the presentation- the US flag and the Vietnam Memorial have that. I'm sorry, but the WWII Memorial doesn't. Chip > -----Original Message----- > From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net]On Behalf Of CB > >And that's when I understand the symbolism of the flag. I can't describe > >the feeling to you, but I get it. > > I'm not sure I can read the list anymore. The crying is taking a lot out > of me. > > It ain't the flag, Bill, its the symbolism. > I know that feeling. I got it riding past a couple at the VietNam Vet > Memorial in DC last month. ------------------------------ Message-ID: <20060606004859.58691.qmail [at] web80514.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:48:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Rick Malone Subject: Forever Plaid Costumes Help. My wife is directing and costuming Forever Plaid. She is in need of 4-5 Plaid Tux jackets 44-46. Her actors have big chests. So far the rent/buy options are out of the budget (1000+). Anybody have any suggestions? Rick Malone in San Antonio ------------------------------ Message-ID: <20060605175716.dci4ko8s448sk4ko [at] www.email.arizona.edu> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:57:16 -0700 From: Mark O'Brien Subject: Re: Forever Plaid Costumes References: In-Reply-To: Quoting Rick Malone : > My wife is directing and costuming Forever Plaid. She > is in need of 4-5 Plaid Tux jackets 44-46. Her actors > have big chests. So far the rent/buy options are out > of the budget (1000+). Anybody have any suggestions? > > Rick Malone > in San Antonio There is some guy who hangs out at the local coffee shop, here in Tucson. He has tattooed his arms in plaid. I'm afraid to ask if it continues past his shirt sleeves... Mark-O Mark O'Brien Opera Technical Director University of Arizona, School of Music 520-621-7025 520-591-1803 Mobile ------------------------------ Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:04:21 -0700 From: NODEraser Reply-To: greg [at] hypersoft.zzn.com Subject: Re: Rosetta [at] home In-Reply-To: References: I've dropped off the SETI wagon as of late, but I have been quite active with distributed computing projects. There are a bunch of them for the BOINC DCP management software, which is probably the best out there. Here's a combined stats page for my team (Me, Mom & Dad and a few friends). Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be listing me right now, probably because I just joined a new project and had to create the team there. http://stats.kwsn.net/team.php?proj=all&teamid=11741 DCP can be pretty powerful stuff. Makes me think I'm doing something to contribute to the world of science. It would be interesting to see how much computing power could be mustered if EVERY computer got attached. As for me, I've got a fourth computer running just for the sake of DCP. Call me a nerd if you wish. ------------------------------ Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:11:13 -0700 From: "Jeffrey Mulvey" Subject: Re: Powering sound equipment off a generator In-Reply-To: References: >BTW, why five > wirelss mics? Wired mics are so much more dependable and require a whole > lot less user knowledge. I'd think on a trailer there'd be almost nowhere > to go... Thanks for the help. True, there is no where to really go and wired mics would be a whole lot more dependable. Given the option, I would go with wired mics. However, the not-for-profit, still-in-it's-infancy, production company saw the need to go wireless right of the bat, due to the complex coreography in their very first fundraising show. They have yet to get around to buying a good set of wired mics. Due to a limited budget, I don't see them buying any more sound equipment within one month's time. So, for now, wireless is all they have. Thanks again. Jeff ------------------------------ Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:14:12 -0700 From: NODEraser Reply-To: greg [at] hypersoft.zzn.com Subject: Re: That flag thred once more In-Reply-To: References: On 6/5/06, b Ricie wrote: > > This past Memorial Day I had the Betsey Ross flying > from my truck. I was in a parking lot and a man in a > truck backed up to tell me "I like that flag". > I said "Thank You" > He said "I fought for that flag". > I said "I owe you another Thank you!" > He must have been a pretty old guy... The 13-star Betsy Ross flag was retired in 1795. ------------------------------ Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 19:34:03 -0700 From: NODEraser Reply-To: greg [at] hypersoft.zzn.com Subject: Re: audio from a generator In-Reply-To: References: On 6/5/06, Jerry Durand wrote: > > What do you do in the case of a float that's moving, can't hardly > drive a spike in the road. > Drag chain? ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 20:27:38 -0400 Subject: Re: Rigging question From: Bill Sapsis Message-ID: In-Reply-To: I'm coming a bit late to this one and if I'm duplicating another's response, my apologies. We're assuming it's a screw pin anchor shackle, yes? The orientation of a shackle is determined solely by the number of devices being placed into the shackle. The bell is designed to carry multiple devices and the pin is designed to carry one. So, if you have bridle legs coming down they go into the bell and the shackle is oriented pin down. But, if you have a stinger coming down and then an inverted bridle running off the bottom of the stinger, then the shackle would be pin up. If you have one sling running into the shackle and one sling running out, as in when you need a 30' downtail but only have 2 15' slings, then the shackle could be pin up or pin down. It does not care. And now to change the subject... 2 straight days of 16 hour rigging calls? Who thought that was a good idea. You should take a look at the sleep depravation studies that have been done to see what happens to your ability to function. Your manual dexterity functions and you ability to reason start falling after 10 hours. By 14 hours all thought processes are pretty much in the toilet. I would strongly advise you to talk with your supervisors and find a better way. That kind of schedule is an accident just waiting to happen. And before the rest of you start yelling at me about how "that's the way it is in this business", please understand that I do not care. The science is right there. It's no mystery what happens to a person's body and mind when they don't get enough sleep. And accidents happen. OK. So maybe it's not a huge 'front page' kind of accident. How about if your the guy who has been up too long and your reaction times are too slow and you get your finger caught in a drive chain? It cuts off the end of your finger, right? Now you have a slightly shorter finger and it doesn't look as nice as the others and, most importantly, the tip is nerve dead. You have no feeling in it. So you spend the rest of your life compensating for that little problem. Yeah, that's me. Happened in '88 and it's been a very minor annoyance ever since. OK. So let's ramp it up a bit. Let's say you lose the entire finger. That's a little more annoying, right? And why did this happen? Because someone did not schedule the work properly and asked (forced?) you to stay up for back to back 16 hour calls. Is that person the one missing the finger? Nope, it's you. Was it worth it? I don't think so. Just my $.02 worth. YMMV Bill S. ETCP Certified Rigger - Theatre www.sapsis-rigging.com 800.727.7471 267.278.4561 mobile Join the Long Reach Long Riders on their 3rd annual cross country charity motorcycle ride. On 6/5/06 12:21 PM, "Donald A Rowe" wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > In the situation(s) where I had the question the bridals were as follows: > > 2 legs: Split 15' Basket Pin Up on the open joint (made in the air) and pin > down on the bottom, a 15' leg (10' & 5' pin up) to a pin down shackle for > the 20' Down with a pin up shackle for the motor. > > Well I think that makes sense to me, 2 straight days of 16 hour rigging > calls are wearing on me, the original hang called for 2 points outside the > building. Why again do we bother sending advances to industrial shows? > > Donald A. Rowe > IATSE Local #3 > Pgh, Pa. 15202 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Idaho Scenic & Rigging" > To: "Stagecraft" > Cc: > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 12:49 AM > Subject: Re: Rigging question > > >> For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see >> --------------------------------------------------- >> >> Pin should go to the motor as the general reference. The >> "bottom" shackle, the one that sets into the bottom hook of >> the motor, I usually do pin up as I have two spansets that >> take up the bell of the shackle. From above, the steel >> that comes off the basket is pin down, a joint (say a >> fifteen leg consisting of a ten and five) would have the >> pin down. In a "normal" bridle (call it two even legs with >> a less than 60 degree spread) the pin would go up at the >> bottom of each leg (apex) and the stinger would have the >> shackle with pin down. The bells of the leg shackles set >> into the bell of the stinger shackle. >> >> If I were to use a pear ring at the apex, the bridle leg >> shackles would go pin down, through the pear. >> >> More confused? less confused? >> >> Glad to explain more. >> >> Rob't >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Brian James" >> To: "Stagecraft" >> Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 10:17 PM >> Subject: Re: Rigging question >> >> >>> For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see >> >>> --------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Why would you always want the pin down? I had always been >> told that >>> generally the "pin should go to the motor" for an >> orientation. >>> Idaho Scenic & Rigging wrote: >>>> For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see >> >>>> --------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> My policy: If the pin CAN go down, it should go down. >>>> If I don't like the looks of an upside down shackle, for >>>> whatever reason, a pear ring will be introduced. >>>> >>>> What part of the leg was it? basket, joint, apex? >>>> All steel or spanset? Regular (concert) bridle, two leg >> or >>>> more? or inverted, >>>> As always, more info needed. >>>> >>>> If he is a senior rigger he shouldn't mind telling you >> his >>>> thoughts on it. >>>> If you ask him. >>>> "No challenge... information please, so I may become >> more >>>> versed" >>>> >>>> Rob't >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Donald A Rowe" >>>> >>>>> I tried to look this up in the archives but got no >>>>> >>>> response so I'll ask the >>>> >>>>> list.... >>>>> >>>>> While on a rigging call I was told to put shackles in >> the >>>>> >>>> bridal legs with >>>> >>>>> the pin up. I seem to remember that the pin should be >>>>> >>>> down ("the shackle >>>> >>>>> takes the weight"). Obviously if there is something in >>>>> >>>> the shackle that >>>> >>>>> could slide across the pin you would spin the shackle >> but >>>>> >>>> before I go and >>>> >>>>> attempt to tell a senior rigger he is wrong I would >> like >>>>> >>>> to have some more >>>> >>>>> information as to why/if I'm correct. So any examples >> or >>>>> >>>> reasonings would >>>> >>>>> be great. Also I'm curious to see if people do this >>>>> >>>> differently. Thanks >>>> >>>>> Donald A. Rowe >>>>> IATSE Local #3 >>>>> Pgh, Pa. 15202 >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 23:14:03 -0400 Subject: Re: ABTT Engineering Conf. From: Bill Sapsis Message-ID: In-Reply-To: One can only hope..... See you ETCP Certified Rigger - Theatre www.sapsis-rigging.com 800.727.7471 267.278.4561 mobile Join the Long Reach Long Riders on their 3rd annual cross country charity motorcycle ride. there. Bill S On 6/5/06 5:30 PM, "Will Hill" wrote: > Look forward to meeting some list members in sunny London Town. ------------------------------ From: MissWisc [at] aol.com Message-ID: <418.2cc533b.31b65481 [at] aol.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 23:46:09 EDT Subject: Re: Rigging question bill [at] sapsis-rigging.com writes: << And before the rest of you start yelling at me about how "that's the way it is in this business", please understand that I do not care. >> Bill - you sound like Doc Doom... and both of you are 100% right on this. And you do care - a LOT - or you wouldn't have said anything. Kristi ------------------------------ Message-ID: From: "Occy" References: Subject: Re: Rigging question Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 21:34:36 -0700 Bill, your right and saved me from typing it out. But you bought up point the IA had a campaign basically bought up by local 600 to stop working after 14 hours years ago what happened to that? Personally I won't work more than 10 hours in a harness. And I am the one that broke the records for the most legal amount of coin in one shift in my local. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Sapsis" > > I'm coming a bit late to this one and if I'm duplicating another's > response, > my apologies. We're assuming it's a screw pin anchor shackle, yes? > > The orientation of a shackle is determined solely by the number of devices > being placed into the shackle. The bell is designed to carry multiple > devices and the pin is designed to carry one. So, if you have bridle legs > coming down they go into the bell and the shackle is oriented pin down. > > But, if you have a stinger coming down and then an inverted bridle running > off the bottom of the stinger, then the shackle would be pin up. > > If you have one sling running into the shackle and one sling running out, > as > in when you need a 30' downtail but only have 2 15' slings, then the > shackle > could be pin up or pin down. It does not care. > > And now to change the subject... > > 2 straight days of 16 hour rigging calls? Who thought that was a good > idea. > You should take a look at the sleep depravation studies that have been > done > to see what happens to your ability to function. Your manual dexterity > functions and you ability to reason start falling after 10 hours. By 14 > hours all thought processes are pretty much in the toilet. I would > strongly > advise you to talk with your supervisors and find a better way. That kind > of > schedule is an accident just waiting to happen. > > And before the rest of you start yelling at me about how "that's the way > it > is in this business", please understand that I do not care. The science > is > right there. It's no mystery what happens to a person's body and mind > when > they don't get enough sleep. And accidents happen. OK. So maybe it's not > a > huge 'front page' kind of accident. How about if your the guy who has > been > up too long and your reaction times are too slow and you get your finger > caught in a drive chain? It cuts off the end of your finger, right? Now > you have a slightly shorter finger and it doesn't look as nice as the > others > and, most importantly, the tip is nerve dead. You have no feeling in it. > So you spend the rest of your life compensating for that little problem. > Yeah, that's me. Happened in '88 and it's been a very minor annoyance > ever > since. > > OK. So let's ramp it up a bit. Let's say you lose the entire finger. > That's a little more annoying, right? And why did this happen? Because > someone did not schedule the work properly and asked (forced?) you to stay > up for back to back 16 hour calls. Is that person the one missing the > finger? Nope, it's you. Was it worth it? I don't think so. > > Just my $.02 worth. YMMV > > Bill S. > ETCP Certified Rigger - Theatre > www.sapsis-rigging.com > 800.727.7471 > 267.278.4561 mobile > > Join the Long Reach Long Riders on their 3rd annual cross country charity > motorcycle ride. > > > > > > > On 6/5/06 12:21 PM, "Donald A Rowe" wrote: > > > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > > --------------------------------------------------- > > > > In the situation(s) where I had the question the bridals were as > > follows: > > > > 2 legs: Split 15' Basket Pin Up on the open joint (made in the air) and > > pin > > down on the bottom, a 15' leg (10' & 5' pin up) to a pin down shackle > > for > > the 20' Down with a pin up shackle for the motor. > > > > Well I think that makes sense to me, 2 straight days of 16 hour rigging > > calls are wearing on me, the original hang called for 2 points outside > > the > > building. Why again do we bother sending advances to industrial shows? > > > > Donald A. Rowe > > IATSE Local #3 > > Pgh, Pa. 15202 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Idaho Scenic & Rigging" > > To: "Stagecraft" > > Cc: > > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 12:49 AM > > Subject: Re: Rigging question > > > > > >> For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> Pin should go to the motor as the general reference. The > >> "bottom" shackle, the one that sets into the bottom hook of > >> the motor, I usually do pin up as I have two spansets that > >> take up the bell of the shackle. From above, the steel > >> that comes off the basket is pin down, a joint (say a > >> fifteen leg consisting of a ten and five) would have the > >> pin down. In a "normal" bridle (call it two even legs with > >> a less than 60 degree spread) the pin would go up at the > >> bottom of each leg (apex) and the stinger would have the > >> shackle with pin down. The bells of the leg shackles set > >> into the bell of the stinger shackle. > >> > >> If I were to use a pear ring at the apex, the bridle leg > >> shackles would go pin down, through the pear. > >> > >> More confused? less confused? > >> > >> Glad to explain more. > >> > >> Rob't > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Brian James" > >> To: "Stagecraft" > >> Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 10:17 PM > >> Subject: Re: Rigging question > >> > >> > >>> For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > >> > >>> --------------------------------------------------- > >>> > >>> Why would you always want the pin down? I had always been > >> told that > >>> generally the "pin should go to the motor" for an > >> orientation. > >>> Idaho Scenic & Rigging wrote: > >>>> For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > >> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------- > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> My policy: If the pin CAN go down, it should go down. > >>>> If I don't like the looks of an upside down shackle, for > >>>> whatever reason, a pear ring will be introduced. > >>>> > >>>> What part of the leg was it? basket, joint, apex? > >>>> All steel or spanset? Regular (concert) bridle, two leg > >> or > >>>> more? or inverted, > >>>> As always, more info needed. > >>>> > >>>> If he is a senior rigger he shouldn't mind telling you > >> his > >>>> thoughts on it. > >>>> If you ask him. > >>>> "No challenge... information please, so I may become > >> more > >>>> versed" > >>>> > >>>> Rob't > >>>> > >>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>> From: "Donald A Rowe" > >>>> > >>>>> I tried to look this up in the archives but got no > >>>>> > >>>> response so I'll ask the > >>>> > >>>>> list.... > >>>>> > >>>>> While on a rigging call I was told to put shackles in > >> the > >>>>> > >>>> bridal legs with > >>>> > >>>>> the pin up. I seem to remember that the pin should be > >>>>> > >>>> down ("the shackle > >>>> > >>>>> takes the weight"). Obviously if there is something in > >>>>> > >>>> the shackle that > >>>> > >>>>> could slide across the pin you would spin the shackle > >> but > >>>>> > >>>> before I go and > >>>> > >>>>> attempt to tell a senior rigger he is wrong I would > >> like > >>>>> > >>>> to have some more > >>>> > >>>>> information as to why/if I'm correct. So any examples > >> or > >>>>> > >>>> reasonings would > >>>> > >>>>> be great. Also I'm curious to see if people do this > >>>>> > >>>> differently. Thanks > >>>> > >>>>> Donald A. Rowe > >>>>> IATSE Local #3 > >>>>> Pgh, Pa. 15202 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > > ------------------------------ Message-ID: <9cbafac70606052228gbf17390we263aa76db6f30 [at] mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:28:58 -0700 From: "Phil Blackwood" Subject: Different Rigging question Hi, fellow listers. I have a unique rigging setup in our current production of Biloxi Blues. The main scenic unit is a wall that spans the width of the stage and looks like a barracks. It is built in 8' w. x 20' h. sections (1x2 steel tubing and faced in Luaun) the 3 center sections are rigged to fly independently of each other but are physically in the same plane. I accomplished this by connecting the lift lines for each wall to the next 3 battens upstage from them. The lift lines run up to custom loft blocks, then down to blocks on the floor which change the direction back up toward the battens. Between each wall panel is a 3x3 steel post with an MDF facing froont and back that resembles the face of an I-beam. This keeps the walls captured so they don't float up/downstage as they fly. Like a track for the to ride in. Here's where I need input: Everything is in balance, but the walls are still a chore to move in and out. I don't think they are binding up as they raise and lower, either. The college kids on the rail can't muscle them smoothly enough. The walls weigh approx. 300#. This is a double-purchase system, so we have 600# balancing them. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Phillip Blackwood Technical Director School of Theater Arts University of Arizona (520)621-1104 ------------------------------ Message-ID: <3998154b0606052312n543c5c96o3175af415c4832e4 [at] mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 23:12:40 -0700 From: "Paul Puppo" Subject: Re: Semper Fi corrections In-Reply-To: References: On 6/5/06, Richard Wolpert wrote: > 1. Semper Fi = Semper Fidelis = Always Faithful. I don't know if it's the > true Latin interpretation, Leave it to the USMC to "alter" Latin. Paul "son of *2* Marine Corp recruiting sergeants" Puppo ILLUMINEERING http://www.Nifty-Gadgets.com ------------------------------ Message-ID: From: "Occy" References: Subject: Re: Different Rigging question Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 23:54:00 -0700 Is or does your system have a compensation system on it? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Blackwood" > --------------------------------------------------- > > Hi, fellow listers. > I have a unique rigging setup in our current production of Biloxi Blues. > The main scenic unit is a wall that spans the width of the stage and > looks like a barracks. > It is built in 8' w. x 20' h. sections (1x2 steel tubing and faced in > Luaun) the 3 center sections are rigged to fly independently of each > other but are physically in the same plane. > I accomplished this by connecting the lift lines for each wall to the > next 3 battens upstage from them. The lift lines run up to custom loft > blocks, then down to blocks on the floor which change the direction > back up toward the battens. > Between each wall panel is a 3x3 steel post with an MDF facing froont > and back that resembles the face of an I-beam. This keeps the walls > captured so they don't float up/downstage as they fly. Like a track > for the to ride in. > Here's where I need input: > Everything is in balance, but the walls are still a chore to move in > and out. I don't think they are binding up as they raise and lower, > either. The college kids on the rail can't muscle them smoothly > enough. > The walls weigh approx. 300#. This is a double-purchase system, so we > have 600# balancing them. > Any thoughts would be appreciated. > > > Phillip Blackwood > Technical Director > School of Theater Arts > University of Arizona > (520)621-1104 > ------------------------------ Message-ID: <9cbafac70606060006m702d1f63t76d7b7d151ec51c4 [at] mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 00:06:14 -0700 From: "Phil Blackwood" Subject: Re: Different Rigging question In-Reply-To: References: Don't think so... can you elaborate? > > Is or does your system have a compensation system on it? ------------------------------ Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 00:12:58 -0700 From: "Jeffrey Mulvey" Subject: Re: textbooks and CADD In-Reply-To: References: >Our students > also obtain the Backstage Handbook, The Pocket Ref, and several others > by the end of their sophomore year. Most have a fairly good library > when they leave here. I own the backstage handbook, but what's "The Pocket Ref"? Jeff ------------------------------ Message-ID: <44852CE4.9070007 [at] gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 03:21:08 -0400 From: Brian James Reply-To: brianedwardjames [at] gmail.com Subject: Re: textbooks and CADD References: In-Reply-To: http://www.sequoiapublishing.com/pdt_pocketref3ed.htm See the URL above, it is a handy little book with lots of concise information in it. Jeffrey Mulvey wrote: > > I own the backstage handbook, but what's "The Pocket Ref"? > Jeff > ------------------------------ Message-ID: <1211.205.215.254.52.1149579194.squirrel [at] webmail.peak.org> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 00:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Semper Fi corrections From: "Bill Nelson" > 3. Don't even get me started on sailors without a ship..... at least word > the insult in proper terms. It should be "squids without a boat" Or, according to an old Navy SEAL acquaintance of mine, "sea going bellhop". I have a number of ex-Marine friends. They do not seem to be any different than my non-military experience friends. Bill ------------------------------ Message-ID: <1289.205.215.254.52.1149581631.squirrel [at] webmail.peak.org> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 01:13:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Different Rigging question From: "Bill Nelson" > Here's where I need input: > Everything is in balance, but the walls are still a chore to move in > and out. I don't think they are binding up as they raise and lower, > either. The college kids on the rail can't muscle them smoothly > enough. > The walls weigh approx. 300#. This is a double-purchase system, so we > have 600# balancing them. I am NOT a rigger, so keep that in mind when you read the following. You are fighting two things here. The two almost 180 degree blocks greatly increase the system friction. Make sure all blocks turn freely, under load. The double purchase system means the intertia and friction effects are essentially doubled for the rope operators. But once they are started moving, assuming everything is in balance, it should not be difficult to keep them moving smoothly. If it is, then those two 180 degree turn blocks may be causing problems. I would think that rerigging the loft would be preferable. Turning blocks would be used to get from the upstage line positions to the desired loft block positions. To keep the friction as low as possible, the loft blocks would be mounted at right angles to their normal orientation. That would mean that each line would pass through 3 blocks, the head block, the turning block and the loft block. Any comments from the rigging experts? Bill N. ------------------------------ End of Stagecraft Digest #834 *****************************