Return-Path: X-Real-To: stagecraftlist [at] theatrical.net Received: by prxy.net (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.2.10) with PIPE id 41276890; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:46:25 -0800 X-List-Processed: mail.prxy.net X-ListMember: stagecraftlist [at] theatrical.net Received: by prxy.net (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.2.10) with PIPE id 41276369; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:45:57 -0800 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=ADVANCE_FEE_1,AWL,BIZ_TLD, INFO_TLD,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID autolearn=no version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on localhost X-Spam-Level: X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 4.2.10 List-Unsubscribe: List-ID: List-Archive: Message-ID: From: "Stagecraft" Sender: "Stagecraft" To: "Stagecraft" Precedence: list Subject: Stagecraft Digest #1091 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:45:21 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline X-TFF-CGPSA-Version: 1.4 X-prxy-Spam-Filter: Scanned For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- Stagecraft Digest, Issue #1091 1. Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines by Bill Sapsis 2. Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines by "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" 3. Theatre and PAC architects by "Bill Conner" 4. Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? by Al Fitch 5. Re: lighting board specs by Herrick Goldman 6. Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? by "Alf Sauve" 7. Re: Independent Lights in the ETC Express Board by Herrick Goldman 8. Re: Theatre and PAC architects by Stephen Rees 9. Re: Theatre and PAC architects by KEITH ARSENAULT 10. Re: Independent Lights in the ETC Express Board by "Steven Haworth" 11. Re: Chopsaw and safety by "Davis, Thomas J" 12. Re: Theatre and PAC architects by "Ed Hills" 13. Re: lighting board specs by "Steven Haworth" 14. Scrim Question by "Maurice Moe Conn" 15. Re: lighting board specs by Herrick Goldman 16. Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? by Al Fitch 17. Re: Osram EHG lamps vs. Altman 360Q sockets by Roy Harline 18. Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? by Dorian Kelly 19. Re: Theatre and PAC architects by Philip Johnson 20. Stephens by b Ricie 21. Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? by Bruce Purdy 22. Theatrical Catalog Sales Position by Tony Tambasco 23. Re: Independent Lights in the ETC Express Board by Bruce Purdy 24. Re: Independent Lights in the ETC Express Board by "John Penisten" 25. Re: Stephens by "Michael Finney" 26. Re: Chopsaw and safety by Bruce Purdy 27. Re: Stephens by KEITH ARSENAULT 28. Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines by "RD" 29. Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines by "RD" 30. Re: Independent Lights in the ETC Express Board by Bruce Purdy 31. Re: Independent Lights in the ETC Express Board by "John Penisten" 32. Roscolux 119 by Paul Marsland 33. Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines by Jerry Durand 34. Re: Roscolux 119 by "Kevin Lowry" 35. Re: lighting board specs by Steve Bailey 36. Re: lighting board specs by Steve Bailey 37. Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? by "Mitch Hefter" 38. Re: Chopsaw and safety by "Davis, Thomas J" 39. Re: Does anyone know? by seanrmc [at] earthlink.net 40. Re: Chopsaw and safety by Bruce Purdy 41. Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines by "Bill Nelson" 42. Re: Theatre and PAC architects by "Peter Scheu" 43. Re: Theatre and PAC architects by KEITH ARSENAULT 44. Re: Theatre and PAC architects by Philip Johnson 45. Re: lighting board specs by "Jason Salvatori" 46. Re: Theatre and PAC architects by "Peter Scheu" 47. Re: Theatre and PAC architects by KEITH ARSENAULT 48. Re: Theatre and PAC architects by "Peter Scheu" 49. Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines by "Bill Nelson" 50. Re: Chopsaw and safety by "Bill Nelson" 51. Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines by "Brian Munroe" 52. Re: Scrim Question by "Bill Nelson" 53. Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines by "Delbert Hall" 54. New tool by J Burch 55. Re: Theatre and PAC architects by "Delbert Hall" 56. Re: Independent Lights in the ETC Express Board by "Bill Nelson" 57. Re: Theatre and PAC architects by "Sam Fisher" 58. Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? by "Occy" 59. Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines by "RD" 60. Re: Theatre and PAC architects by Philip Johnson 61. Re: Roscolux 119 by Herrick Goldman *** Please update the subject line of your reply to use the subject *** line of the message you are replying to! Please only reply to *** one message subject in each reply. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:14:58 -0500 Subject: Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines From: Bill Sapsis Message-ID: In-Reply-To: The domestic turnbuckles are fine. The imported ones that I sell are the best that I can find but I still do not load rate them. I only load rate the domestic ones. I have always disliked turnbuckles and no one ever has given me a reason to change my mind. Bill S. ETCP Certified Rigger - Theatre ETCP Council Member www.sapsis-rigging.com 800.727.7471 267.278.4561 mobile On 1/15/07 1:29 AM, "Jon Ares" wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > Unka Bill sez: >> Most turnbuckles are crap. >> > > > Hopefully not the ones you sell...? Cuz I own a bunch..... > > - Jon Ares > www.hevanet.com/acreative ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" Subject: RE: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:16:06 -0500 Message-ID: <000201c7389e$eeffd3c0$6501a8c0 [at] Dell> In-Reply-To: > I have always disliked turnbuckles and no one ever has given > me a reason to change my mind. I like them because "turnbuckle" is such a cool Dickensian word. Howzzat? ------------------------------ Message-ID: <00b001c738a6$9ce3cd50$6a01a8c0 [at] BCA1> Reply-To: "Bill Conner" From: "Bill Conner" Subject: Theatre and PAC architects Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:11:04 -0600 I would be less concerned about just the architect's experience in arts and theatres but rather the whole team - architects, engineers, theatre consultant, and acoustic consultant. Some of the best results of projects I have worked on included an architect that had little or no theatre experience. They did bring good communication skills, a willingness to listen, being dedicated to serving the client, and good design. At the end of the day, the owner group that will be working with the architect needs to be comfortable with them. They should share a lot of box lunches and time together over the course of the project. It should be a positive, memorable, experience for all involved. Bill Conner ASTC ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:32:59 -0800 (PST) From: Al Fitch Subject: Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <263805.78563.qm [at] web84015.mail.mud.yahoo.com> My dilemma is that three weeks ago we did a musical and rented 9-10 wireless. The company I rented from came in and used our cables to the speakers, added a sub-mixer and a pair of FOH speakers on stands (I recently bought the same pair from that company to replace an old pair of JBL loudspeakers) There was no hum or buzz in the system. I did the current install myself. I could be using a wrong cable to hook up the sub-mixer for the orchestra. Does Bal/UnBal TRS cable matter when hooking up an instrument to a DI? The Musical Dir has an 8 channel mixer that is connected via an XLR cable to my last available input. His Keyboard is connected via a DI to another input. Does Bal/UnBal TRS cable matter when hooking up an instrument to a DI? I know that it gets quieter (slightly) when his mixer is off. But the lights make up for it when I have a bright cue on stage or a lot of FOH lights up in a cue. Because of the hum/buzz, I'm holding back on the master levels on the main board which in turn limits the output of the lead's wireless mic. It has not been a fun weekend. One more show to go tonight and I have to track down the overall cause before March...and fix it. --- Jerry Durand wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > > --------------------------------------------------- > > > On Jan 14, 2007, at 5:46 PM, Al Fitch wrote: > > > What steps have you taken to kill the buzz? > > > Start tracking from one end until you find it. > Unplug inputs to the > sound board, if things go quiet, you found it. If > not, unplug > outputs... > > continue until you find it or realize that > everything is turned off > and it's really the fire alarm PA system. > > Be Kind, Smile and Have Fun. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:24:28 -0500 Subject: Re: lighting board specs From: Herrick Goldman Cc: chanlights [at] exchange.ubc.ca Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <28007313.1168844837513.JavaMail.root [at] m41> Andrew, Yes you should go to USITT and put your hands on stuff. However I think you should look at the ETC EOS. It does NOT have enough handles, however it does have a ton of "direct selects" that can be your handles and as you select them you just need to run their levels up. I forget if this is a dial or a handle... I understand the "crutch" of having tons of handles to run concerts live. But these seem to be disappearing on many boards that do everything you describe. Find your local ETC rep and get a demo. I'm sure they'd love to have you come see it. Also ask yourself or your students how many handles they really use for these gigs. Sure you may have 110 lights and they may get set before the concert, but I bet they also have time to record a few subs. So maybe during a classical concert they are running the conductor, the keyboards, and a few solo spots. For a rock concert I'm sure you've got moving lights ,and having individual handles would be harder anyway. _herrick On 1/14/07 8:56 PM, "Riter, Andrew (Head Ltg)" wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > and Question #2: > > I get the buy a new lighting board this summer, and then another one for the > other space in two years. Currently we're running the Strand LBX and the > Strand 430 in the concert hall and black box studio respectively. We're > replacing the concert hall board first. -- Herrick Goldman Lighting Designer, NYC www.HGLightingDesign.com 917-797-3624 "To the scores of silent alchemists who wreak their joy in darkness and in light bringing magic to life, we bow most humbly. "-CDS ------------------------------ Message-ID: <006f01c738b0$a1e7a1a0$0300a8c0 [at] ALFOFFICE> Reply-To: "Alf Sauve" From: "Alf Sauve" References: Subject: Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:18:19 -0500 Al, I wasn't clear from your first post, where the hum was emanating from, but from your last post, I take it the hum is definitely from the speakers, and not emanating from the PA/Fire system or a mechanical vibration of the building by the HVAC equipment. Of course, since you didn't have the hum 3 weeks ago, then the first suspect is anything that was changed, moved or added. One thing to consider is an open ground on one of the cables. It may have been okay 3 weeks ago but got disturbed and broken in the reconfiguration. Disconnecting one component at a time from the mixer back to the speakers, as others suggested, should isolate the offending cable. (If that's the problem.) Lighting might be the source of the hum, but I wouldn't call it the "culprit". Alf ----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Fitch" To: "Stagecraft" Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 8:32 AM Subject: Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > My dilemma is that three weeks ago we did a musical > and rented 9-10 wireless. The company I rented from > came in and used our cables to the speakers, added a > sub-mixer and a pair of FOH speakers on stands (I > recently bought the same pair from that company to > replace an old pair of JBL loudspeakers) > > There was no hum or buzz in the system. > > I did the current install myself. I could be using a > wrong cable to hook up the sub-mixer for the > orchestra. Does Bal/UnBal TRS cable matter when > hooking up an instrument to a DI? > > The Musical Dir has an 8 channel mixer that is > connected via an XLR cable to my last available input. > His Keyboard is connected via a DI to another input. > Does Bal/UnBal TRS cable matter when hooking up an > instrument to a DI? > > I know that it gets quieter (slightly) when his mixer > is off. But the lights make up for it when I have a > bright cue on stage or a lot of FOH lights up in a > cue. > > Because of the hum/buzz, I'm holding back on the > master levels on the main board which in turn limits > the output of the lead's wireless mic. It has not > been a fun weekend. One more show to go tonight and I > have to track down the overall cause before > March...and fix it. > > > --- Jerry Durand wrote: > >> For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see >> >> --------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> On Jan 14, 2007, at 5:46 PM, Al Fitch wrote: >> >> > What steps have you taken to kill the buzz? >> >> >> Start tracking from one end until you find it. >> Unplug inputs to the >> sound board, if things go quiet, you found it. If >> not, unplug >> outputs... >> >> continue until you find it or realize that >> everything is turned off >> and it's really the fire alarm PA system. >> >> > > > Be Kind, Smile and Have Fun. > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:31:52 -0500 Subject: Re: Independent Lights in the ETC Express Board From: Herrick Goldman Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <14907335.1168848310836.JavaMail.root [at] m41> Huh? Please elaborate your view on this? I think it's innaccurate but I want to make sure I just didn't mis-read you. On 1/15/07 2:38 AM, "Bill Nelson" wrote: > > On all the boards I have used, the A/B faders control the channel sliders. > So if you want to be able to update cues on the fly, then the cues must be > run on the C/D fader pair. > > Bill > > -- Herrick Goldman Lighting Designer, NYC www.HGLightingDesign.com 917-797-3624 "To the scores of silent alchemists who wreak their joy in darkness and in light bringing magic to life, we bow most humbly. "-CDS ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:34:25 -0500 Subject: Re: Theatre and PAC architects From: Stephen Rees Message-ID: In-Reply-To: May I suggest that while the relationship you form with the architect has to be a good match to get what you need, the complexity of designing all the elements of even smaller venues in this day and age often exceed the capability of a single person in the form of architect to assure that every T is crossed and I dotted. There needs to be a "fit" between the client and the architect. I'd suggest that while you are seeking the architect, you should also be seeking a well informed Theatre Consultant as well. They can be invaluable and can save loads of time and money and are generally more current with newer systems and gear, plus have a somewhat clearer crystal ball as to what might be needed for future expansion 5 - 10 years out. As competent as the architects have been on a couple of recent projects in the area, the risks of several very costly mistakes were avoided by having the TC involved. There are several on this list and you can check out the American Society of Theatre Consultants at: www.theatreconsultants.org HTH, Steve Rees On 1/14/07 3:10 PM, "Barney Simon" wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > In the NJ town where I live, there is a group working to build a PAC. > They have asked me to look at the introductory proposals from about a > dozen architects, so they can ask for interviews and another round of > proposals.... > > Any clues what others have looked for? > > On first perusal, I like the ones with mainly/only PAC/theatres (the > ones that list 100 projects and only 10 are even Arts related I feel I > want to discount). > That eliminates about half of them. Then these seem to fall into three > catagories: Local, Regional, Further. For example, one of the groups > lists 10-15 projects ALL in NJ or CT; One lists 10-15 projects, no two > in the same state. This division I find harder to justify.... Do I want > a smaller local guy, or someone who has been run out of as many states > as I have... I have a lot in common with both! > > I plan to start calling theatres next week, but would like to have a > better idea of what to ask and judge upon. Any suggestions are most > appreciated. [I figure it is wrong to choose based upon which one > promises me the drapery contract] ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: From: KEITH ARSENAULT Subject: Re: Theatre and PAC architects Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:41:57 -0500 friends, you have heard Delbert Hall , Tracy Nunally and myself comment at times on the terribly designed Hillborough Community College performing arts facility here in Tampa (this is the one some of the lift cables for the single purchase system running through the HVAC ductwork ) that building is currently under radical rebuilding ( for more than what I would consider "remodeling" or "renovation" ) I understand that there is a consultant involved, , but don't know who, , I would be interested in knowing if anyone on the list was involved in the re design of this horrific space. Most any change will be an improvement. many thanks in advance, Keith L Arsenault International Arts & Entertainment Group Tampa, Florida www.iaeginc.com 813 831 3465 office 813 205 0893 cellular iaeg [at] aol.com ------------------------------ Subject: RE: Independent Lights in the ETC Express Board Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:04:43 -0600 Message-ID: <5D5187063B6B8B46A99E8C0D36E0EB0901AAAC71 [at] danube.river.idm.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Steven Haworth" I like to write a macro or two to control certain groups of work or house lights by parking them - fast to use, and doesn't mess w/my cues. =20 >The only way that I know of to take something out of being=20 >written into a >cue is by putting it in park. - Steven (sjh [at] idm.com) --------------------------- http://www.stagelights.info ------------------------------ Subject: RE: Chopsaw and safety Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:11:30 -0500 Message-ID: <3CF87682970858499CA56707FB1F092B0347C656 [at] wscc-s-003000.westshore.edu> In-Reply-To: References: From: "Davis, Thomas J" Hello all: I probably am the last person who should pontificate on this, but having read through all the commentary on this for the last few days, here are my thoughts, for what they are worth... "Adequate supervision," it seems to me, means that by definition NO ONE is operating power tools without safety glasses, without rolling up their sleeves, without proper instruction. Clearly, if obvious safety hazards exist, more supervision is required- or maybe the supervisors need more training, discipline or supervision themselves. However, "supervision" also means that the management, administration, or whoever is willing to back up the supervisor on safety issues. All too often in theater, common sense safety takes a back seat to expedience. This is what leads to adjusting lights over the heads of rehearsing actors (and more than once, someone crawling out on a catwalk with a wrench over the heads of the audience), or cutting "just a couple pieces" on a saw without going to the cabinet for safety glasses. The problem here is that often as not, there is a director (or someone else over the shop foreperson's head- and I don't really mean to single out directors, but you all know one who is like this) that is ordering that something be done right this second. Oh, and let me not forget the time I was threatened with firing for suggesting that putting folding chairs in the aisle was not really a good idea, even if the show was a sellout. Students and volunteers are required to take and pass a safety quiz (no one has ever had to take it more than once). The quiz is simple, mostly common sense stuff, but it does put everyone working in the shop or on stage on record as knowing that they are required to use appropriate safety equipment and know basic safety procedures. My syllabus contains the clauses: Safety Rule #1: Some of the work done on stage and in the shop is inherently dangerous. It is of the utmost importance that students are comfortable with the tasks they are asked to perform. Students should not perform any function in which they do not have confidence in their own skill, or in the equipment. Students will not be penalized for fear of heights, saws, etc.=20 "Dress Code:" Students are advised to provide suitable clothing for shop and theater work. This includes: 1. Clothes that are "paintable" and reasonably close fitting (loose clothing can become caught on equipment or scenery). Long pants are preferable to skirts or shorts. Operators of power tools are to wear short sleeves or roll sleeves up. 2. Do not wear loose fitting (ie: long necklace) or expensive jewelry, remove jewelry when operating power tools. 3. Shoes should have good traction- work or athletic shoes, and protect the feet (do not wear sandals, high heels, etc.). 4. Long hair should be "worn up, tied back or netted to avoid being caught in moving parts or machines. Now, before the semester starts in 3 days, I'd better get my butt into the shop, count the safety glasses and ear plugs, and try organize Ralph Cramden's closet, oops, sorry, I mean props storage.... Tom Davis ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:11:25 -0500 From: "Ed Hills" Subject: RE: Theatre and PAC architects In-reply-to: Reply-to: Message-id: <004901c738b7$7035c090$ed01a8c0 [at] prescott> References: Hello All- It's been a while... "(this is the one some of the lift cables for the single purchase system running through the HVAC ductwork )" This is my pet peeve... Build sets say one thing about HVAC, and then the HVAC contractor comes in and does just about anything they want with ductwork. Including not putting a large enough, or high enough, return in the balcony, boy that was hot. Ed Hills Lighting Designer ------------------------------ Subject: RE: lighting board specs Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:24:51 -0600 Message-ID: <5D5187063B6B8B46A99E8C0D36E0EB0901AAAC73 [at] danube.river.idm.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Steven Haworth" Would an Avolites PEARL be a good option here? IIRC, those boards seem better set for 'live' running of moving lights than others. Never used one, though, so I'm not an authority on 'em! - Steven (sjh [at] idm.com) --------------------------- http://www.stagelights.info=20 ------------------------------ Message-ID: From: "Maurice Moe Conn" Subject: Scrim Question Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:28:23 +0000 Anyone know anything about this company and this New Chameleon™ Theatrical Scrim for Set Design. http://www.studio-productions-inc.com/set_home.html A former student has asked me about it and I am coming to the best place I know for info. TIA Moe Help support Long Reach Long Riders 2006 Charity Ride. For Donation and/or Rider information, Check out: www.lrlr.org _________________________________________________________________ Find sales, coupons, and free shipping, all in one place!  MSN Shopping Sales & Deals http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctid=198,ptnrid=176,ptnrdata=200639 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:31:06 -0500 Subject: Re: lighting board specs From: Herrick Goldman Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <21163813.1168874866660.JavaMail.root [at] m41> In my experience with the AVO consoles (admittedly with an operator who only spoke Tagalog) they are hard to use if you want a "theatrical style" cue stack. Yes they are very nice for live random access shows. Their UI and visual feedback leave something to be desired. On 1/15/07 10:24 AM, "Steven Haworth" wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > Would an Avolites PEARL be a good option here? IIRC, those boards seem > better set for 'live' running of moving lights than others. Never used > one, though, so I'm not an authority on 'em! > > > - Steven (sjh [at] idm.com) > --------------------------- > http://www.stagelights.info > > -- Herrick Goldman Lighting Designer, NYC www.HGLightingDesign.com 917-797-3624 "To the scores of silent alchemists who wreak their joy in darkness and in light bringing magic to life, we bow most humbly. "-CDS ------------------------------ Message-ID: <20070115154334.46265.qmail [at] web84007.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:43:34 -0800 (PST) From: Al Fitch Subject: Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? Cc: alf.sauve [at] mindspring.com (Alf Sauve) In-Reply-To: --- Alf Sauve wrote: Lighting might be the source of the hum, but I wouldn't call it the "culprit". Alf Dam! I wanted to go skiing this weekend! :) Be Kind, Smile and Have Fun. ------------------------------ Subject: RE: Osram EHG lamps vs. Altman 360Q sockets Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:03:26 -0600 Message-ID: <0B76B8BBFAC8BA41949EF1A06C24730C1D649A [at] TSSBSR2.ts.local> In-Reply-To: From: Roy Harline Scott Peterson asked about Osram EHG lamps.=20 I just checked my notes and found that in Late September a notice was sent out by Osram that they have a back of lamps with the G9.5 base that were manufactured out of spec.=20 You should contact the people that sold you the lamps. They should have received the same information we have, with the instructions on how to replace those lamps. Roy Harline Sales and Design Texas Scenic Company 210-684-0091 =20 >=20 > We have noticed with a recent batch of Osram EHG (750w) lamps=20 > that they don't fit into the bases of our old Altman 360Q=20 > fixtures. It seems like the lamp bases are now formed with=20 > sharper corners, as opposed to the rounded off corners they=20 > used to have. >=20 > Anyone else notice this? Any suggestions that don't include=20 > removing the sheet metal that covers the top of the socket?=20 > Could I sand the corners down a smidge? >=20 > Thanks, > -Scott >=20 > Scott Peterson > Technical Director > Highlander Auditorium - Upland, CA > scott [at] highlanderauditorium.com ------------------------------ Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:45:41 +0000 From: Dorian Kelly Subject: Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? >For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see >--------------------------------------------------- > >More questions then answers for now... > >In our small 197 seat theatre there is a persistant >hum, no buzz that is killing me. It gets noticably >louder when I run a light cue involving no specific >lights. > If there is a low persistent filament sing which gets more noticeable during a lighting change, them the answer probably lies in the dimmers themselves. Is the a noise coming from the dimmer rack itself? or from the luminaires? Or are the lights causing a hum in the sound system rather than the other way round? It could be that some of the chokes or the smoothing are not up to spec. in some very cheap dimmers. You may need to specify new dimmers with a high rise time. Another possibility is that you are using cheap lamps with inadequate filament support, but if you have been having this problem for ten years it probably isnt that. Dorian Kelly -- Illuminati Creative Technology 3 Gladstone Road Colchester Essex UK +44 1206 798076 07770 950964 mailto:Info [at] theatrearts.biz http://www.theatrearts.biz ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:40:13 -0600 Subject: Re: Theatre and PAC architects From: Philip Johnson Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On 1/15/07 7:11 AM, "Bill Conner" wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > I would be less concerned about just the architect's experience in arts and > theatres but rather the whole team - architects, engineers, theatre > consultant, and acoustic consultant. Another thing you will want to check out is what types of equipment your consultants typically spec. Some consultants have specific equipment they want to use and getting them to use the manufacturers you may already have on site can be a battle. If you want compatibility and the ability to interchange between facilities then you need to work on this. It is real easy for a consultant and building committee to say there will be no sharing between facilities to justify a choice they are making. The practicality and functionality after they leave is that if your sister facility has the piece you need or vice versa you will swap. Typical things I have to deal with are twist lok in my house and stage pin in the pac. They have ET dimmers and I have ETC. Luckily the sound consultant was savvy and worked with us for the most part. Too often the designers, builders, and administrators have an idea of what they want the building to do then pass it off to us to do these things. Rarely to they give us effective tools and make our lives easier. -- Philip Johnson Professor of Theatre Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:13:12 -0800 (PST) From: b Ricie Subject: Stephens In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <333097.34469.qm [at] web50615.mail.yahoo.com> >>>>Yes we were. course load, required shop hours, weekend work, homework and on top of it all part/full time jobs (needed that money thing). And don't forget getting teased by the Mizzou theater students when hanging out at the Burg. << I did not want to pick on the poor Mizzou theatre people. They were just jealous, wishing their program was as good as Stephens. Brian Rice 508-685-0716 b_ricie [at] yahoo.com "Blessed are the cracked: For it is they who let in the light." ____________________________________________________________________________________ Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <089357B9-C78D-4F9F-A4B7-40F7DC2BABE1 [at] rochester.rr.com> From: Bruce Purdy Subject: Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:26:49 -0500 On 15 Jan 2007, at 08:32, Al Fitch wrote: > I did the current install myself. I could be using a > wrong cable to hook up the sub-mixer for the > orchestra. Does Bal/UnBal TRS cable matter when > hooking up an instrument to a DI? I believe it could. Does your DI have a balanced TRS input? Mine don't, they have standard 1/4" Mono jacks, as do the outputs of most instruments. Putting a three conductor plug into a two conductor jack might work sometimes, but not always. I think it depends on the manufacturer / design of both the plug and jack - I wouldn't depend on "Might". Instrument cables are two - conductor, unbalanced, and that's what you should use. Actually, the first thing I would do if I were you, is turn the system on and hear the hum, then unplug the keyboard from the DI and see if the hum goes away. Do *Not* just turn the keyboard off - *Unplug* the cable from the DI. If this does not cure the problem by itself, then unplug all the input cables from your mixer. Did the hum go away? If so, plug them back in again one at a time until the hum re-appears. Then you have a better idea of where the problem is coming from. If the hum does NOT go away, leave them unplugged and unplug the mixer from the amp rack. I would look first at that TRS cable in the DI box though. Turning off the power to the keyboard won't help if the problem is in the cables / connections. Note, I am not a sound guy - I'll leave that to CB - but I've had to learn to troubleshoot, maintain and operate the system because, well, there's no one else here to do it. Bruce ____________________ Bruce Purdy Technical Director Smith Opera House ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:39:00 -0800 (PST) From: Tony Tambasco Subject: Theatrical Catalog Sales Position Message-ID: <109445.89290.qm [at] web50711.mail.yahoo.com> Greetings list, I've seen a spate of job posting on the list lately, and thought that one more couldn't hurt. Anyone living around, or interested in moving to, the northern reaches of Vermont take heed: THEATRICAL CATALOG SALES POSITION Production Advantage, Inc., the fastest-growing merchant of technical performing arts supplies, offers a great job opportunity for the right person. This technical theatre specialist will help our customers get what they need, when they need it, at a reasonable price. The successful candidate will have an extensive background in technical theatre, a pleasant phone manner, good typing skills and a passion for helping make theatre happen. Basic computer literacy is also required. Sales experience a plus. Relocation to Vermont required. TD’s who are sick of being underpaid and overworked, and would like to have evenings and weekends off are encouraged to apply. Resumes with a cover letter may be sent to: Production Advantage, Inc., Human Resources, PO Box 1700, Williston, VT, 05495-1700. E-mailed responses to jobs [at] proadv.com OK. NO PHONE CALLS, PLEASE. Production Advantage is an EOE. Tony Tambasco email: tambascot [at] yahoo.com cell: 716-450-8148 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <262F110E-3FF1-4AD7-8C64-CA9BBF15C184 [at] rochester.rr.com> From: Bruce Purdy Subject: Re: Independent Lights in the ETC Express Board Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:45:46 -0500 On 14 Jan 2007, at 20:42, Jeff Mabray wrote: > The only way that I know of to take something out of being written > into a > cue is by putting it in park. and Steven Haworth added: > I like to write a macro or two to control certain groups of work or > house lights by parking them - fast to use, and doesn't mess w/my > cues. Thanks for the suggestions. I'm still learning the Express board - years of simple two-scene boards before that. It's relative complexity and potential is awesome and daunting, so I find it best to learn one or two new things and work with them until I'm really comfortable before I move on to learn something more. "Park" and "Macros" will have to be the next two tools to learn about and add to my mental toolbox. I love this list! By the way, I've been bitten more than once myself by running on C/ D but mistakenly hitting the A/B Go button for one cue. That cue stays up to haunt me for the rest of the show. Thanks to the list for the suggestion to use a bottle cap taped over the unwanted GO button. I Too can't really fathom how I would ever really use the second GO button - I guess that's for "Power users" who do much more elaborate shows than we do here. Like I said, Learn and master one tool at a time, and that one is way down the list. ;-) Bruce ____________________ Bruce Purdy bpurdy [at] rochester.rr.com ------------------------------ Message-ID: <87e6786e0701151002y6f3f4b24k74f9eac3b84978e9 [at] mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:02:00 -0600 From: "John Penisten" Subject: Re: Independent Lights in the ETC Express Board In-Reply-To: References: Bruce, C/D is great for that long running sunrise/sunset cue. Have it go in your alternate stack and just run in the background while you continue using your primary stack for the rest of the show. If I am not using C/D I usually pull the faders down. I have found my ops are less likely to accidentally go on that stack, and if they do nothing is output to the stage anyway. You can easily clear that cue and re-load it into A/B and take it again. Also; on an Express board you can put it into single scene mode which turns A/B into a conventional crossfader pair (disabling Go, Hold, Back, Clear) for the two scenes, and you can use C/D as your playback control. Hope this helps. Best, John > By the way, I've been bitten more than once myself by running on C/ > D but mistakenly hitting the A/B Go button for one cue. That cue > stays up to haunt me for the rest of the show. Thanks to the list for > the suggestion to use a bottle cap taped over the unwanted GO button. > I Too can't really fathom how I would ever really use the second GO > button - I guess that's for "Power users" who do much more elaborate > shows than we do here. Like I said, Learn and master one tool at a > time, and that one is way down the list. ;-) ------------------------------ Subject: Re: Stephens Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:11:04 -0800 Message-ID: <44FC1DD5E9E93D4F9D4C289DF28F7C3F2E0313 [at] thinkwellsbs.ThinkWell.corp> From: "Michael Finney" <>=20 OK, so now I'm having bad flashbacks to being a Mizzou (University of Missouri - Columbia for you heathens) student from '76 to '79! For the uninitiated, the Burg (or "Berg") was The Old Heidelberg - the closest bar to the theatre. Something like 235 steps from the loading dock door as I recall. Vaguely. I'd heard rumors that it had burned... And I'll confess - I ventured over to Stephens a fair amount to do shows...they were known to hire carpenters and painters when they got slammed or when the set design kind of overwhelmed the current crop of shop slaves. And welders and riggers on a regular basis. Paid for a fair number of evenings out that way... Seriously - good school. Their dance program has gotten a little beat up over the years, and the seem to be experiencing a good bit of staff turnover, but the core program seems to produce solid undergraduates. Lots of production opportunities.=20 Missed all the nude Jell-O wrestling....my live-in dance girlfriend at the time wouldn't believe that it was a condition of employment for me to participate.....grumble, grumble, grumble...=20 =20 Michael Finney Thinkwell Design & Production mfinney [at] thinkwelldesign.com www.thinkwelldesign.com=20 ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <8F67FBDB-F94D-44F7-AA19-423866159EA3 [at] rochester.rr.com> From: Bruce Purdy Subject: Re: Chopsaw and safety Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:15:39 -0500 > "Adequate supervision," it seems to me, means that by definition NO > ONE > is operating power tools without safety glasses, without rolling up > their sleeves, without proper instruction. I read the various posts on tool safety , supervision etc. with a troubled mind. I am in a real-world situation that doesn't fit any of the moulds discussed so far. I am neither in an educational environment, nor in a commercial shop. In fact we have no shop at all. When a particular Community Theatre company is in my space, the director brings his personal chop saw and various actor / set construction folks bring various other power tools. A dozen or more untrained and unsupervised folks share and exchange tools. No safety goggles or hearing protection, let alone proper clothing, is ever used (Except by myself). As the facility's TD, I feel responsible for safety, but have no authority to "require" anything - and the director doesn't appear to care himself. I try to watch for dangerous situations, but am constantly running around trying to stop parents from sticking duct tape in the Gold Leaf finished columns to hold up signs and notices, or from clearing off the coffee creamers etc from a table at the concession stand so they can take the table into the auditorium to set their laptop on to play video games. I am the only one present to protect the interests of the Theatre, and that's not likely to change. They are already upset at having to pay for my time in the first place. Before I came along, they were just given the keys to the building and allowed to do whatever they wanted. Bringing it back to tool safety, it's kind of frustrating to read this thread and knowing what I face. I'm not really looking for advice or solutions, just offering a window into an aspect of the "Real world" that might otherwise be overlooked. Bruce ____________________ Bruce Purdy Technical Director Smith Opera House ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: From: KEITH ARSENAULT Subject: Re: Stephens Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:16:32 -0500 I ate at the THE OLD HEIDELBERG this past November while on tour with CIRCUS NEXUS and performing at JESSE AUDITORIUM, there at U OF MO according to the press clippings I saw on the walls, , yes it had burned down a couple of years ago and the restaurant I ate in is the "new" OLD HEIDELBERG, great food, , I hear it has historically been the hang out for the famed U of MO school of journalism. On Jan 15, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Michael Finney wrote: OK, so now I'm having bad flashbacks to being a Mizzou (University of Missouri - Columbia for you heathens) student from '76 to '79! For the uninitiated, the Burg (or "Berg") was The Old Heidelberg - the closest bar to the theatre. Something like 235 steps from the loading dock door as I recall. Vaguely. I'd heard rumors that it had burned... Keith L Arsenault International Arts & Entertainment Group Tampa, Florida www.iaeginc.com 813 831 3465 office 813 205 0893 cellular iaeg [at] aol.com ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "RD" References: Subject: RE: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:23:48 -0700 Message-ID: <000001c738d2$4e236aa0$6501a8c0 [at] doom1> In-Reply-To: Bill: do you hear me clapping? I reckon it is because you are in my = daily prayers, and I like that answer a lot. Doom=20 -----Original Message----- From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net] On Behalf Of Bill = Sapsis Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 6:34 PM To: Stagecraft Subject: Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- Long story short. The turnbuckles in your system are completely unnecessary. And, depending on where the turnbuckles came from, they = could be dangerous. Most turnbuckles are crap. I have no idea why they put them in your system but you should remove = them at your earliest opportunity. Bill S. ETCP Certified Rigger - Theatre ETCP Council Member www.sapsis-rigging.com 800.727.7471 267.278.4561 mobile On 1/14/07 5:15 PM, "Maia Robbins-Zust" wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see = > --------------------------------------------------- >=20 > Question for all the riggers on the list. >=20 > Now that we=B9ve gone through the roundsling ratings (with a special > thank-you to Uncle Bill for the link to the =8Clift-all=B9 site, that = really > helped clarify the color/ratings for me) I have a question about the = use > of turnbuckles on chain hoist lines. >=20 > One of the venues that I work is a newly re-fitted =8Chemp=B9 house = with its > electric=B9s line-sets run on 1/2-ton and 1-ton chain hoists. Each of > these electric line-sets consists of a horizontal, steel, flat-truss > picked at three points with chain hoists. The hoists are attached to > the top pipe (or stringer) of the truss, while the lights are hung = from > the bottom pipe (stringer) of the truss. Now here=B9s the question: = The > hoist chain is attached to the top pipe with a forged turnbuckle > (properly moused off) =AD is this a good idea? Or not? >=20 > Every time we run these electrics in/out there is that bounce that > happens when the motors start and/or stop. This is even more = pronounced > when one =B3bumps=B2 the motors to adjust the electric to exactly the = height > that the designer wants. It just seems to me that this repeated > bouncing is putting some pretty heavy stresses on the threads of those > turnbuckles. >=20 > The rigging in this venue was done by a very reputable, midwestern > rigging company, so I didn=B9t question the use of the turnbuckles in > these lines. But now, going on a year later, I=B9m starting to worry > about them. There doesn=B9t seem to be any need to have turnbuckles = in > the lines since we have individual control of each motor and can = adjust > the level of the electric trusses easily (in fact we have to do that > about every 3rd or 4th time that the line-set is run because the = motors > all seem to travel at just a little bit different speeds.) >=20 > We are about to have a two week down-time in this venue and it would = be > the perfect time to do the work of taking out these turnbuckles. But = -- > this is extra labor -- and I have to convince the management that = it=B9s > worth spending money on. So, I=B9m looking to get some feed back and > opinions. Am I over-worrying? Or are these turnbuckles a week (and > dangerous) link in these lines? >=20 > Thanks for all your help! >=20 > Maia Robbins-Zust > Technical Director > ETCP certified rigger - theatre >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "RD" References: Subject: RE: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:23:48 -0700 Message-ID: <003d01c738d2$66152d60$6501a8c0 [at] doom1> In-Reply-To: And even larger if you look at the Izenous installation and design at the Thomas Center in Akron. Doom My inspection there revealed a great deal. -----Original Message----- From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net] On Behalf Of ladesigners [at] juno.com Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 12:30 AM To: Stagecraft Subject: Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- Dear Bill, Most turnbuckles that are used in the construction of suspension bridges appear to be pretty robust, and not resemble 'crap', to me. I don't think that you stock turnbuckles ~12' long that weigh ~1/2 ton. /s/ Richard _____________________________ Unka Bill sez: > Most turnbuckles are crap. > Hopefully not the ones you sell...? Cuz I own a bunch..... - Jon Ares ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <6B0E7D14-4D02-4CE0-956E-DE63574310BC [at] rochester.rr.com> From: Bruce Purdy Subject: Re: Independent Lights in the ETC Express Board Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:32:22 -0500 On 15 Jan 2007, at 13:02, John Penisten wrote: > C/D is great for that long running sunrise/sunset cue. Have it go in > your alternate stack and just run in the background while you continue > using your primary stack for the rest of the show. Ah, that does make sense. Thanks. > > If I am not using C/D I usually pull the faders down. I have found my > ops are less likely to accidentally go on that stack, and if they do > nothing is output to the stage anyway. You can easily clear that cue > and re-load it into A/B and take it again. Assuming that you realise that it happened. First time it took a bit of figuring after the final curtain to realise WHY one special never went out - even during blackouts. The Op had pushed the wrong button end didn't even know he had done so. I find the bottle cap to be the best protection. > > Also; on an Express board you can put it into single scene mode which > turns A/B into a conventional crossfader pair (disabling Go, Hold, > Back, Clear) for the two scenes, and you can use C/D as your playback > control. Don't you mean two scene mode? I hadn't thought of switching modes for playback when using a cue recorded show. Actually though that's why I prefer to use C/D for running cues, as I think of that as the "Cued show" pair as distinct from A/B which is the "Two scene crossfade" pair. > > Hope this helps. It does indeed. Thanks for the food for thought! Bruce ____________________ Bruce Purdy Technical Director Smith Opera House ------------------------------ Message-ID: <87e6786e0701151041l768971c8i8bb0b90453f80cc [at] mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:41:22 -0600 From: "John Penisten" Subject: Re: Independent Lights in the ETC Express Board In-Reply-To: References: That is, of course, what I meant. Thank you, John > > Also; on an Express board you can put it into single scene mode which > > turns A/B into a conventional crossfader pair (disabling Go, Hold, > > Back, Clear) for the two scenes, and you can use C/D as your playback > > control. > > Don't you mean two scene mode? ------------------------------ Message-ID: <20070115190039.32482.qmail [at] web52212.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:00:39 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Marsland Subject: Roscolux 119 In-Reply-To: I have long been un-enamored with Rosco for their (apparent)lack of manufacturing control of their gel products, and their (apparent) willingness to re-engineer (cost-engineer?) products without much concern to the end user (see the "tough prime" discussion last month) Paul > > From: MartySrq [at] aol.com > Message-ID: > Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:47:34 EST > Subject: Re: Roscolux 119 > > Am I nuts or is the current R119 not the same as it > used to be? Seems less > diffuse and closer to R132 than it was. I ended up > doubling it up on a recent > production to fuzz out cut lines and managed to find > old stock that appeared > different than the latest stuff shipped. Anyone else > who used it recently > notice this? > > Marty > > ------------------------------ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss an email again! Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:06:56 -0800 From: Jerry Durand Subject: Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines In-reply-to: Message-id: <7.0.1.0.0.20070115110528.01fd62a8 [at] interstellar.com> References: At 11:29 PM 1/14/2007, ladesigners [at] juno.com wrote: >Most turnbuckles that are used in the construction of suspension >bridges appear to be pretty robust, and not resemble 'crap', to me. I >don't think that you stock turnbuckles ~12' long that weigh ~1/2 ton. We were in a local OSH hardware store and noticed some turnbuckles several feet long on the rack. We asked the salesman who buys those. He said no idea, they were there when he started working there as a kid, never sold one. :) -- Jerry Durand, Durand Interstellar, Inc. www.interstellar.com tel: +1 408 356-3886, USA toll free: 1 866 356-3886 Skype: jerrydurand ------------------------------ Message-ID: <5a73bd8d0701151114j39fb4489yeb622142d54aa9fa [at] mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:14:31 -0500 From: "Kevin Lowry" Subject: Re: Roscolux 119 In-Reply-To: References: About 15 years ago Rosco 119 looked the same as today's 132 over time there was a drift in the manufacturing to what it looks like today. Many designers that we worked with like the progression of 119 so we decided to introduce 132 to fill the void. Rosco has checked our current stock and it matches the manufacturing standards. Rosco is committed to the quality of all of our products and if you are unhappy with any product please feel free contact your dealer or any Rosco Representative and we will be able to discuss the products and problems with you and help you find a solution. Thank you, Kevin Lowry Rosco Laboratories Product Quality and Development 800-767-2669 ext 230 klowry [at] rosco.com ------------------------------ Message-ID: <15134DE1EA20CF4BA1F473FADAC653AC509562 [at] cassini.BrooklynCollege.local> From: Steve Bailey Subject: RE: lighting board specs Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:27:38 -0500 -----Original Message----- From: Riter, Andrew (Head Ltg) [mailto:chanlights [at] exchange.ubc.ca] The rough specs for it should include some combination of the following: 1 - 2 DMX universes; more than 96 channel or sub handles; each with own bump/flash button; decent effect package; moving light control (not a Hog, but for small rentals coming in with 4 - 6 ML), Library of ML; dual screens; multiple sub pages; ability to type in names of cues, subs, channels, dimmers, etc; ability to track changes through cues; programmable softkeys/macros/LCD Keys; remote control (wired or wireless); printer capable; and ability to store shows on disk/USB/Hard drive. You get the idea. The big requirement is number of handles. The LBX has 72 channel handles and 24 subs. Neither are enough (and it maxes out at 125 channels total). We run most of our shows live, without recording cues; so instant access to that special or this wash is mandatory. Andrew I'm a long time Express 2 scene user who recently upgrade to Emphasis. If I had the money I *might* purchase an Insight II to replace the Express. I would not attempt to run ML's on the Insight without Emphasis and even w/ Emphasis there are admittedly trade-off's as to Emphasis's ability to program quickly and control complex effects and playbacks as compared to a newer and dedicated ML console. I'm currently of the opinion that outside of an Avo Diamond 4, there probably is no one perfect console for you (any my) needs - I.E. lot's of handles that can be channels as well as playbacks in a console that speaks ETC Expression (which an Avo won't due in any event) as well as has good ML functionality. The Insight w/ Emphasis might be the trick, running roughly $18,000, of which Emphasis basic 500 channel, 2d Emphasis is $5,000 or so. It certainly has the handles and w/ Emphasis has some great functionality for Subs to become channels as well as Supermasters controlling other subs. With subroutines on subs you can (in theory) get multiple effect playbacks - including ML's, though there are some limitations with this. I would certainly look into the new Strand stuff as they use a more advanced format for ML's then the older ETC Express/ion OS. I looked at the Marquee and was somewhat turned off by the layout of the fader wings and feel the same way about the Congo Jr. Give both a look at as well though as they are both getting generally positive comments. Feel free to contact me off list if you have any add'l questions as my Express/Emphasis experiences. Steve Bailey Brooklyn College ------------------------------ Message-ID: <15134DE1EA20CF4BA1F473FADAC653AC509563 [at] cassini.BrooklynCollege.local> From: Steve Bailey Subject: RE: lighting board specs Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:33:21 -0500 -----Original Message----- From: Steve Bailey [mailto:Bailey [at] BrooklynCenter.com] If I had the money I *might* purchase an Insight II to replace the Express. Correction: Make that an Insight III SB ------------------------------ Message-ID: <32233.12.156.239.114.1168890855.squirrel [at] webmail6.pair.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:54:15 -0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? From: "Mitch Hefter" Reply-To: stagecraft03 [at] DesignRelief.com James Feinberg wrote: > > At USITT in Phoenix, I picked up a very interesting tidbit at the Stump > The Electricians session. It's common, especially in older fixtures > with old-style Union connectors, for the neutral and ground to short > against each other. It won't trip the breaker, and it won't impact > lighting operations, but it will cause a nasty buzz in the sound > system. > > There was a Stump the Electricians session at USITT '06 in Louisville. We will be having another one in Phoenix this March. The most common cause of hum/buzz I've encountered over the years has been bad grounds or ground loop(s) in the sound system - the problem not being due to the lighting system, just made evident by it. And simply "grounding everything" doesn't necessarily help if you've got a ground loop - it could make it worse. CB will set me straight here I'm sure. Whenever I've been questioned about a sound system buzz that wasn't there before the dimmer system, I've always asked them to verify the ground loop situation. If there isn't one, then we'll go onto the next step, such as a bad ground, bad neutral, or ground/neutral issue as described above. I can't recall anyone calling back to say that they have no ground loop issue but still have a buzz. Of course, there may be a first time. ------------------------------ Subject: RE: Chopsaw and safety Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:13:02 -0500 Message-ID: <3CF87682970858499CA56707FB1F092B03845562 [at] wscc-s-003000.westshore.edu> In-Reply-To: References: From: "Davis, Thomas J" Sorry Bruce, I did not mean to show a lack of sympathy for your position. I spend too much of my own time removing tape reside (thankfully no gold leaf here to pull off) and rearranging the furniture not to know where you are coming from. It sounds like you are indeed in a position where you are not being backed up by the powers-that-be. Which is to say: safety requirements ought to be spelled out in the contracts for use of the space. While I do have my share of problems with support here, the administration DID back me up when I told the touring children's theater that they could not install light trees in the aisles of the theater, even if they did it "everywhere else they ever played." =20 Tom D -----Original Message----- From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Purdy Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 1:16 PM To: Stagecraft Subject: Re: Chopsaw and safety For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- > "Adequate supervision," it seems to me, means that by definition NO =20 > ONE > is operating power tools without safety glasses, without rolling up > their sleeves, without proper instruction. I read the various posts on tool safety , supervision etc. with a =20 troubled mind. I am in a real-world situation that doesn't fit any of =20 the moulds discussed so far. I am neither in an educational =20 environment, nor in a commercial shop. In fact we have no shop at =20 all. When a particular Community Theatre company is in my space, the =20 director brings his personal chop saw and various actor / set =20 construction folks bring various other power tools. A dozen or more =20 untrained and unsupervised folks share and exchange tools. No safety =20 goggles or hearing protection, let alone proper clothing, is ever =20 used (Except by myself). As the facility's TD, I feel responsible for safety, but have no =20 authority to "require" anything - and the director doesn't appear to =20 care himself. I try to watch for dangerous situations, but am =20 constantly running around trying to stop parents from sticking duct =20 tape in the Gold Leaf finished columns to hold up signs and notices, =20 or from clearing off the coffee creamers etc from a table at the =20 concession stand so they can take the table into the auditorium to =20 set their laptop on to play video games. I am the only one present to protect the interests of the Theatre, =20 and that's not likely to change. They are already upset at having to =20 pay for my time in the first place. Before I came along, they were =20 just given the keys to the building and allowed to do whatever they =20 wanted. Bringing it back to tool safety, it's kind of frustrating to read =20 this thread and knowing what I face. I'm not really looking for =20 advice or solutions, just offering a window into an aspect of the =20 "Real world" that might otherwise be overlooked. Bruce ____________________ Bruce Purdy Technical Director Smith Opera House ------------------------------ Message-ID: <28584715.1168893049693.JavaMail.root [at] elwamui-muscovy.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:30:49 -0500 (GMT-05:00) From: seanrmc [at] earthlink.net Reply-To: seanrmc [at] earthlink.net Subject: Re: Does anyone know? Cc: jkanyuck [at] Harford.edu Jeff, You can get them from an ETC dealer. They should cost you about $3 to $6 each. My suggestion is Barbizon Capitol: (703) 750-3900 Fisher Theatrical is now also an ETC dealer, I believe. Don't have their number handy. Production Advantage should also be able to get them for you. --Sean (in DC) Sean R. McCarthy seanrmc [at] earthlink.net -----Original Message----- >From: Jeffrey Kanyuck > >If lens for the S4 PAR are sold seperately anywhere? I've only found >them in catalogs as boxes of 4, with one of each kind inside (VNSP, NSP, >MFL and WFL). >Or is the box of 4 the only way they are sold? > >Jeff ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: From: Bruce Purdy Subject: Re: Chopsaw and safety Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:38:49 -0500 On 15 Jan 2007, at 15:13, Davis, Thomas J wrote: > It sounds like you are indeed in a position where you are > not being backed up by the powers-that-be. Which is to say: safety > requirements ought to be spelled out in the contracts for use of the > space. I get plenty of support where I make a stand, such as audience safety issues, and refusing to fly people without bring in a professional and such. It's when groups bring in their own power tools and such the issue becomes "They can do what they want with their own stuff, so long as third parties like the audience doesn't risk injury and the facility isn't damaged". > I spend too > much of my own time removing tape reside (thankfully no gold leaf here > to pull off) and rearranging the furniture not to know where you are > coming from. The board is especially concerned about the gold and silver leaf plaster that they spent so much money refinishing. They aren't theatre people, and see the place more as a museum - with no real understanding of what's actually involved in a working Theatre. A lot of that fancy plaster extends up alongside our rather deep apron, right next to where the speaker stacks and Geni lifts go for the lighting trusses. A stage full of heavy rolling road boxes and workers that don't share the board's appreciation for the fine gilt walls always spells trouble! Fortunately this type of large scale concerts usually only come here two or three times a year, but the board is constantly pointing out minor scuff marks and implying that I just don't care. Now they want me to build some kind of plywood walls or something to "Protect" the walls (Which I also would have to find some place to store). It's a darn good thing I love working here so much, but it does get frustrating at times. Sorry, I just needed to vent! Bruce ____________________ Bruce Purdy Technical Director Smith Opera House ------------------------------ Message-ID: <2529.205.215.253.92.1168893582.squirrel [at] webmail.peak.org> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:39:42 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines From: "Bill Nelson" > We were in a local OSH hardware store and noticed some turnbuckles > several feet long on the rack. We asked the salesman who buys > those. He said no idea, they were there when he started working > there as a kid, never sold one. :) If stainless steel or bronze, they may have been initially for sailboat rigging. I have seen some pretty heavy duty turnbuckles on the boat on which I used to teach sailing. Bill ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "Peter Scheu" Subject: RE: Theatre and PAC architects Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:56:57 -0500 Organization: Scheu Consulting Services, Inc. Message-ID: In-reply-to: Phillip Johnson wrote: >Some consultants have specific equipment they >want to use and getting them to use the manufacturers=20 >you may already have on site can be a battle.=20 As has been mentioned before by me and others, you cannot always blame consultants for this. First of all, I agree with the thrust of part of your statement - that consultants should not be biased one way or another towards any one particular manufacturer. There are enough fine manufacturers out there = to satisfy quality and safety concerns (ETC, Strand, JRC, SECOA, H&H, ADC, Wenger, StageRight, etc...). One does have to be wary of some with poor track records, and try not be blinded by some other's dazzling = marketing. There can be some operational differences (i.e. how an ETC board = operates vs. a Strand board), and if that is your concern, it needs to be very = clear in the spec what you want- FUNCTIONALLY. But even that tactic can break down... BUT, unless the Owner/Architect/GC/CM is willing (and able by = regulations governing publicly financed projects) to wear "the black hat" and throw = out unwanted bids or gear, there is little a Theater Consultant can do other than advise everyone to be watchful or to simply "throw da bums out". I have a perfect example which happened to us a couple of years ago (Caution: Long Story) - We wrote a spec for a local regional high = school's new lighting system. The Owner wanted ETC, because that's the gear they = had in their other schools and they wanted interchangeability. This was, in = our mind, not an unreasonable request. We wrote the spec around ETC gear, = per the Owner's request. When the documents when to the State Education Department for review, the State said that by law (because of public funding) the spec could not be limited to one manufacturer/contractor. = But we could stress the interchangeability requirement. So, the spec was re-written to allow for Strand gear as a pre-approved equal, so long as = it could interface with existing systems in the other schools Because in this project, the GC's didn't have to name their subs at time = of bid (not in our control), the electrical contractor carried (unbeknownst = to all) EDI equipment, value engineered the system without the Owner's permission, and then tried to ram it down everyone's throat. That's = where we and the Owner got kinda hot and said this is "apples and oranges" folks. = The EC came back and pointed to a single line in the spec (that the State mandated we add) that defined the scope of work as simply "provide a = fully functional performance stage lighting system" and that EDI system they carried met the scope of work as defined by the State. Only when the = Owner threatened to hold up payments to the GC & CM did they back off, and = they provided a full Strand system, as provided for in the spec. Not the ETC system originally envisioned, but ultimately acceptable to the Owner. Although the local ETC rep was pretty pissed... As an Owner, and the one who signs the checks, you have the ultimate = power. You shouldn't be afraid to use it when push comes to shove. Just my .02, (and probably worth every penny). Peter Scheu Scheu Consulting Services, Inc. Syracuse, NY=20 www.scheuconsulting.com ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: From: KEITH ARSENAULT Subject: Re: Theatre and PAC architects Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:05:59 -0500 here in the state of Florida , , I have a serious suspicion that there are funds passing under the table, , as way too often, in fact just about ALWAYS, public schools and other state run facilities are equipped with equipment made by "non standard" theatrical suppliers, , and ETC, Strand etc are seldom found, , rigging and stage layouts are bizarre and nothing that any high school theatre teacher would want, , Principals dictate curtain color, which ends up meaning that you sometimes have full stage sets of legs and borders in bizarre "school color" combination.. I wince every-time i go into a public school theatre, , even the relatively nice one that we have here in Tampa for the Blake HS of the Performing Arts. In almost every case, , the "bad" result that they end up with, with non standard layout, , non standard equipment suppliers , cost the same as what would have been far more satisfactory result. I truly suspect that certain architects and contractors who specialize in HS's here in Florida are on the take and have for a number of years..... On Jan 15, 2007, at 3:56 PM, Peter Scheu wrote: Because in this project, the GC's didn't have to name their subs at time of bid (not in our control), the electrical contractor carried (unbeknownst to all) EDI equipment, value engineered the system without the Owner's permission, and then tried to ram it down everyone's throat. That's where we and the Owner got kinda hot and said this is "apples and oranges" folks. The EC came back and pointed to a single line in the spec (that the State mandated we add) that defined the scope of work as simply "provide a fully functional performance stage lighting system" and that EDI system they carried met the scope of work as defined by the State. Only when the Owner threatened to hold up payments to the GC & CM did they back off, and they provided a full Strand system, as provided for in the spec. Not the ETC system originally envisioned, but ultimately acceptable to the Owner. Although the local ETC rep was pretty pissed... Keith L Arsenault International Arts & Entertainment Group Tampa, Florida www.iaeginc.com 813 831 3465 office 813 205 0893 cellular iaeg [at] aol.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:13:46 -0600 Subject: Re: Theatre and PAC architects From: Philip Johnson Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On 1/15/07 2:56 PM, "Peter Scheu" wrote: > As has been mentioned before by me and others, you cannot always blame > consultants for this. Actually, I can blame the consultant for this as the firm he worked for or at least he had a bias against ETC. ET was his choice. We had problems getting the system up. We had to go to another vendor to get a console because ET couldn't deliver the console. The vendor, manufacturer or whomever was responsible didn't train the tech guy enough. Should I go on... All I am saying is to take into account what types of equipment you may want and talk to the consultants. See what they spec and speak up. The unfortunate things which occur are when this ability is taken away from you. -- Philip Johnson Professor of Theatre Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi ------------------------------ Message-ID: <1caebf780701151321x2bb469fcmf74a5bcaf1b06739 [at] mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:21:51 -0500 From: "Jason Salvatori" Subject: Re: lighting board specs In-Reply-To: References: Just my opinion, but I have found the Strand 300 series to have a "cheap" feel to the faders and a "go" button that makes you have to double check if you've hit it. Last time I played with one was about 4 years ago, so maybe there have been improvements. The same problems don't exist with the 500's, but those don't meet your requirements for tons of faders. Jason Salvatori Technical Director Vaughan City Playhouse > 1 - 2 DMX universes; > more than 96 channel or sub handles; each with own bump/flash button; decent > effect package; moving light control (not a Hog, but for small rentals > coming in with 4 - 6 ML), Library of ML; > dual screens; > multiple sub pages; > ability to type in names of cues, subs, channels, dimmers, etc; ability to > track changes through cues; > programmable softkeys/macros/LCD Keys; > remote control (wired or wireless); > printer capable; > and ability to store shows on disk/USB/Hard drive. ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "Peter Scheu" Subject: RE: Theatre and PAC architects Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:41:52 -0500 Organization: Scheu Consulting Services, Inc. Message-ID: In-reply-to: KEITH ARSENAULT wrote: >In almost every case, , the "bad" result that they end up with, with >non standard layout, , non standard equipment suppliers , cost the >same as what would have been far more satisfactory result. ...or even may have cost more. I would argue that in almost every case, a good Theater Consultant is a bargain. A good consultant will make up their fee in preventing change orders alone. It's easy to bash consultants. I know, I've done my share. But even a mediocre consultant should do at least one thing well - keep the value in the project. Try to make sure the Owner is getting the most bang for their buck. Like Keith, I've seen "bargain basement" systems provided for "top shelf" prices, and no one seemed the wiser. And the spec'ing of non-standard, custom, "hey, look how clever I am" equipment when readily available, standard equipment will do the job for the same or less cost, is simply a waste of the Owner's money, IMHO. With typical HS lighting systems easily costing $150K and up, and rigging systems the same, a little bit of money on the front end for a good consultant is nothing compared to the double-digit, multi million $$$'s new schools cost these days. ...and Bill Conner can attest to how cheap some of us work ;-) Peter Scheu Scheu Consulting Services, Inc. Syracuse, NY www.scheuconsulting.com ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: From: KEITH ARSENAULT Subject: Re: Theatre and PAC architects Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:45:17 -0500 Unfortunately, , I have personally witnessed school boards and a community college who very specifically didn't want a consultant "in the way" nor would they take input from staff or faculty, , who were told to "stay out of it, we know what is best" all the more reason why I suspect "foul play" On Jan 15, 2007, at 4:41 PM, Peter Scheu wrote: I would argue that in almost every case, a good Theater Consultant is a bargain. A good consultant will make up their fee in preventing change orders alone. Keith L Arsenault International Arts & Entertainment Group Tampa, Florida www.iaeginc.com 813 831 3465 office 813 205 0893 cellular iaeg [at] aol.com ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "Peter Scheu" Subject: RE: Theatre and PAC architects Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:46:09 -0500 Organization: Scheu Consulting Services, Inc. Message-ID: In-reply-to: Philip Johnson wrote: >All I am saying is to take into account what types of=20 >equipment you may want >and talk to the consultants. See what they spec and speak up. The >unfortunate things which occur are when this ability is taken=20 >away from you. Phillip, I couldn't agree with you more. If your consultant is not = listening to you, and is designing and spec'ing systems and equipment to meet = someone else's needs (especially their own!), it's time to get another = consultant. Peter Scheu Scheu Consulting Services, Inc. Syracuse, NY=20 www.scheuconsulting.com ------------------------------ Message-ID: <2784.205.215.253.92.1168898967.squirrel [at] webmail.peak.org> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:09:27 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines From: "Bill Nelson" > about them. There doesnıt seem to be any need to have turnbuckles in > the lines since we have individual control of each motor and can adjust > the level of the electric trusses easily (in fact we have to do that > about every 3rd or 4th time that the line-set is run because the motors > all seem to travel at just a little bit different speeds.) I don't like individual motors on picks, for of that exact reason. Unless there are only two picks, the truss is flexed more than necessary with the variable distribution of tension in the chains. I also do not like motors/systems that cannot be ramped up and down in speed. > We are about to have a two week down-time in this venue and it would be > the perfect time to do the work of taking out these turnbuckles. But -- > this is extra labor -- and I have to convince the management that itıs > worth spending money on. So, Iım looking to get some feed back and > opinions. Am I over-worrying? Or are these turnbuckles a week (and > dangerous) link in these lines? Without knowing the ratings of the turnbuckles, it would be impossible to say. However, they certainly are unnecessary - thus adding additional failure modes to the rigging. Keep in mind that I am not a rigger, only a person who believes in KISS. Bill ------------------------------ Message-ID: <2794.205.215.253.92.1168899709.squirrel [at] webmail.peak.org> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:21:49 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Chopsaw and safety From: "Bill Nelson" > the moulds discussed so far. I am neither in an educational > environment, nor in a commercial shop. In fact we have no shop at > all. When a particular Community Theatre company is in my space, the > director brings his personal chop saw and various actor / set > construction folks bring various other power tools. A dozen or more > untrained and unsupervised folks share and exchange tools. No safety > goggles or hearing protection, let alone proper clothing, is ever > used (Except by myself). In my experience, this is more the normal situation than the exception. It is unusual for a community theatre to have access to a real shop, so all set construction is often done on stage. And, given the usual shortage of volunteers, the cast and crew are often drafted to help. Bill ------------------------------ Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:04:12 -0500 From: "Brian Munroe" Subject: Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines In-Reply-To: References: On 1/15/07, Bill Sapsis wrote: > I have always disliked turnbuckles and no one ever has given me a reason to > change my mind. What do you use instead when you need to adjust tension or trim a line? A link of chain is quite often too gross of an adjustment. Brian Munroe bpmunroe [at] gmail.com ------------------------------ Message-ID: <2965.205.215.253.92.1168902610.squirrel [at] webmail.peak.org> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:10:10 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Scrim Question From: "Bill Nelson" > Anyone know anything about this company and this New Chameleon™ > Theatrical Scrim for Set Design. Our local community theatre purchased 3 panels of the Dark Gray, which was closer to what I would call light gray. They hang easily. We taped the panels together using medical adhesive tape, because it is thin and almost transparent. The resulting seams were just about invisible from a distance. I do not like them - as I don't like the halo produced with any lighting of an object behind the scrim. But that is what the director wanted for the show where they were used. If you want the classic "disappearing scrim" effect, forget it. Bill ------------------------------ Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:30:45 -0500 From: "Delbert Hall" Subject: Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines In-Reply-To: References: Generally speaking, I am not a fan of turnbuckles, except in a few rare occasions (and this ain't one of them). I agree with the other on the list who say to remove them. -Delbert -- Delbert L. Hall ETCP Certified Rigger - Theatre 423-773-4255 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:32:23 -0800 (PST) From: J Burch Subject: New tool Message-ID: <731841.40824.qm [at] web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Greetings I recently found out about a tool that someone on this list may be interested in. http://www.carvewright.com/ is the link. It looks about the size of a planer, but essentially acts as c&c router controlling the x & y axis of cut as well as depth. It isn't marketed for industrial use, but it looks potentially usable for props. Jean Burch ____________________________________________________________________________________ We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265 ------------------------------ Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:40:56 -0500 From: "Delbert Hall" Cc: peter [at] scheuconsulting.com Subject: Re: Theatre and PAC architects In-Reply-To: References: On 1/15/07, Peter Scheu wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > > I would argue that in almost every case, a good Theater Consultant is a > bargain. A good consultant will make up their fee in preventing change > orders alone. Very true. Change orders can be very expensive and the bigger the project the more expensive they are. -Delbert -- Delbert L. Hall ETCP Certified Rigger - Theatre 423-773-4255 ------------------------------ Message-ID: <3010.205.215.253.92.1168905279.squirrel [at] webmail.peak.org> In-Reply-To: References: <14907335.1168848310836.JavaMail.root [at] m41> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:54:39 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Independent Lights in the ETC Express Board From: "Bill Nelson" > Huh? Please elaborate your view on this? I think it's innaccurate but I > want to make sure I just didn't mis-read you. > >>On all the boards I have used, the A/B faders control the channel sliders. >>So if you want to be able to update cues on the fly, then the cues must be >> run on the C/D fader pair. Maybe my terminology is confusing. All the boards I have worked with have the channel sliders on the left. Then, from left to right, the A/B cluster, the C/D cluster and the keypads. The submasters have been in various places, depending on the board. These have always been one/two scene boards and I have always run them in one scene so that I have the maximum number of slider controlled channels available. I don't know if some boards allow attaching the C/D sliders to the channel sliders, I have never tried to do so. The boards have always booted up with them attached to the A/B sliders. I guess the A/B sliders could be considered to be the channel masters. So I set both A/B sliders to 100% and leave that cluster alone. All intensities are set by use of the channel sliders, unless I have more channels assigned than there are sliders - then I use the keypad. Once I have the look I want, I record the cue. Once all cues are set, the starting cue is loaded into the C/D stack (which is closest to the keypad) and run the show from there. If I want to update a cue on the fly, it is a simple matter to use the channel sliders still attached to the A/B sliders to adjust the levels - then update the cue. I hope this clarifies what I was trying to say before. Bill ------------------------------ From: "Sam Fisher" References: Subject: RE: Theatre and PAC architects Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 21:01:32 -0500 Organization: Fisher Theatrical Message-ID: <000401c73912$3ec682a0$0300a8c0 [at] ftoffice.local> In-Reply-To: Yes, but you have to keep in mind, no matter how good the theatre consultant is (and please let us all know if you find a good one) the general contractor and architect may very well not listen to them, and you will have the change orders anyway. What you need is good honest contractors that will do their best to coordinate and prevent changes. Sam Fisher -----Original Message----- From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net] On Behalf Of Delbert Hall Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 6:41 PM To: Stagecraft Cc: peter [at] scheuconsulting.com Subject: Re: Theatre and PAC architects For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- On 1/15/07, Peter Scheu wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > > I would argue that in almost every case, a good Theater Consultant is a > bargain. A good consultant will make up their fee in preventing change > orders alone. Very true. Change orders can be very expensive and the bigger the project the more expensive they are. -Delbert -- Delbert L. Hall ETCP Certified Rigger - Theatre 423-773-4255 ------------------------------ Message-ID: From: "Occy" Cc: stagecraft03 [at] DesignRelief.com References: Subject: Re: Sussing Sound Buzz when lighting might be the culprit? Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:24:41 -0800 Or the reverse wired pick up on a guitar for a very famous guitar player in an very famous band and it was his favorite guitar. But wanted to know if he didn't play the guitar the buzz would go away, we all nodded, then he said well it does the same thing at home, what should I expect he then said. The guitar player only used that guitar on one song because of the buzz it generated. This group toured with 78 guitars on that tour, I think they had plenty, that they could to choice from, but not sure. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mitch Hefter" > > > > There was a Stump the Electricians session at USITT '06 in Louisville. We > will be having another one in Phoenix this March. > > The most common cause of hum/buzz I've encountered over the years has been > bad grounds or ground loop(s) in the sound system - the problem not being > due to the lighting system, just made evident by it. And simply > "grounding everything" doesn't necessarily help if you've got a ground > loop - it could make it worse. CB will set me straight here I'm sure. > > Whenever I've been questioned about a sound system buzz that wasn't there > before the dimmer system, I've always asked them to verify the ground loop > situation. If there isn't one, then we'll go onto the next step, such as > a bad ground, bad neutral, or ground/neutral issue as described above. I > can't recall anyone calling back to say that they have no ground loop > issue but still have a buzz. Of course, there may be a first time. > > ------------------------------ Reply-To: From: "RD" References: Subject: RE: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:25:12 -0700 Message-ID: <005701c73915$91936180$6501a8c0 [at] doom1> In-Reply-To: Hurrah! Good move. Doom -----Original Message----- From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net] On Behalf Of Delbert Hall Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 4:31 PM To: Stagecraft Subject: Re: Turnbuckles on chain hoist lines For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- Generally speaking, I am not a fan of turnbuckles, except in a few rare occasions (and this ain't one of them). I agree with the other on the list who say to remove them. -Delbert -- Delbert L. Hall ETCP Certified Rigger - Theatre 423-773-4255 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:30:43 -0600 Subject: Re: Theatre and PAC architects From: Philip Johnson Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Unfortunately, it was a package deal, when we build phase two we will be more careful. Phil Johnson On 1/15/07 3:46 PM, "Peter Scheu" wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > Philip Johnson wrote: > >> All I am saying is to take into account what types of >> equipment you may want >> and talk to the consultants. See what they spec and speak up. The >> unfortunate things which occur are when this ability is taken >> away from you. > > Phillip, I couldn't agree with you more. If your consultant is not listening > to you, and is designing and spec'ing systems and equipment to meet someone > else's needs (especially their own!), it's time to get another consultant. > > Peter Scheu > > Scheu Consulting Services, Inc. > Syracuse, NY > www.scheuconsulting.com > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 21:37:24 -0500 Subject: Re: Roscolux 119 From: Herrick Goldman Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <22185277.1168887804192.JavaMail.root [at] m41> Just as a counterpoint. I have had great success with Rosco. Either helping to invent the right color, or come up with the best combination of glass colorizers to use. They helped procure 8 50 gallon drums of fog fluid on a short turn around and have worked with me on installations to help me get the effect I need. I can't speak to the Paint (tough prime) department, but Color and SFX has always been there for me and the projects I've worked on. _Herrick On 1/15/07 2:00 PM, "Paul Marsland" wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > I have long been un-enamored with Rosco for their > (apparent)lack of manufacturing control of their gel > products, and their (apparent) willingness to > re-engineer (cost-engineer?) products without much > concern to the end user (see the "tough prime" > discussion last month) > > Paul > >> -- Herrick Goldman Lighting Designer, NYC www.HGLightingDesign.com 917-797-3624 "To the scores of silent alchemists who wreak their joy in darkness and in light bringing magic to life, we bow most humbly. "-CDS ------------------------------ End of Stagecraft Digest #1091 ******************************