Return-Path: X-Real-To: stagecraftlist [at] theatrical.net Received: by prxy.net (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.2.10) with PIPE id 41546720; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 03:01:19 -0800 X-List-Processed: mail.prxy.net X-ListMember: stagecraftlist [at] theatrical.net Received: by prxy.net (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.2.10) with PIPE id 41546717; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 03:01:19 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on localhost X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS, SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.7 X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 4.2.10 List-Unsubscribe: List-ID: List-Archive: Message-ID: From: "Stagecraft" Sender: "Stagecraft" To: "Stagecraft" Precedence: list Subject: Stagecraft Digest #1103 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 03:00:52 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline X-TFF-CGPSA-Version: 1.4 X-prxy-Spam-Filter: Scanned For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- Stagecraft Digest, Issue #1103 1. Re: Drinks night by KEITH ARSENAULT 2. Re: Drinks night by Herrick Goldman 3. Re: Non-Manila Counterweight Operatng line by Bruce Purdy 4. Re: Venezuelan lamp by "Mt. Angel Performing Arts Center" 5. Re: Palm Treo and Bluetooth by megironda [at] att.net (Gerry G.) 6. Re: Non-Manila Counterweight Operatng line by "Bill Nelson" *** Please update the subject line of your reply to use the subject *** line of the message you are replying to! Please only reply to *** one message subject in each reply. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: From: KEITH ARSENAULT Subject: Re: Drinks night Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:05:35 -0500 considering the hour, , and the beverages consumed Herrick has given a fairly accurate portrayal of the evening , , , ( note the time of this posting ! ) i commend him, , now I am going to sleep, , back to Florida tomorrow eve,, , , , a good time was had by all ! On Jan 23, 2007, at 12:54 AM, Herrick Goldman wrote: What?? No one posted a summary? Damn...now I have to do it... Forgive any Shlurred Werds.. For the record I left a bit Early at 12:30am leaving Joe saint and his gang along with Keith Arsenault. Yeah I coulda done it but it would have been ugly... Other attendees: Herrick Susan Nicholson Ken & Lisa Romaine (lisa is the prettier one) Steven Ehrenberg (yes finney we gave him shit) Andy Leviss Tony from City Theatrical and his friend who's name if I spelled it would be butchered......and yes Andrew you suck for not coming! Unkie Bill whom I hope is safely at home by now. Ms. Rosa Theadora Cooper Mr. Steve Shelley & Wife Judy with the world's smallest template and business card. (yes she's prettier too!) Surprise Guest Christina Gianelli (who isn't on the list but is ESTA) Stephen Allain Joe Saint Brian Aldous Travis Keith Arsenault Mike Finney Via Webcam "stand near the bar and wave!" Klyph...via text..."sorry can't make it"... All in all we had about 18 drunkards. For the record; Shelley if Barco had known that they could rent your Pate for advertising space...they would have paid for the beer.....Next TIME!!! -H Keith L Arsenault International Arts & Entertainment Group Tampa, Florida www.iaeginc.com 813 831 3465 office 813 205 0893 cellular iaeg [at] aol.com ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:06:53 -0500 Subject: Re: Drinks night From: Herrick Goldman Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <12913646.1169532210977.JavaMail.root [at] m41> I dint eben tell ya wat we drunk! On 1/23/07 12:59 AM, "MissWisc [at] aol.com" wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > You sure know how to make us jealous! > > Glad a good time was had by all. > > Kristi > > -- Herrick Goldman Lighting Designer, NYC www.HGLightingDesign.com 917-797-3624 "To the scores of silent alchemists who wreak their joy in darkness and in light bringing magic to life, we bow most humbly. "-CDS ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References:

Message-Id: <52143B34-B46D-4239-B95D-8BD846C31C84 [at] rochester.rr.com> From: Bruce Purdy Subject: Re: Non-Manila Counterweight Operatng line Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:17:58 -0500 On 22 Jan 2007, at 23:11, Rigger wrote: > I have a spike ground from an old flat-blade screwdriver and a a > pair of rope-clamps I welded up from a pair of ViseGrips with > pieces of 1" black pipe in the jaws (photos by request). I'd love to see them! Bruce ____________________ Bruce Purdy Technical Director Smith Opera House ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:18:35 -0800 From: "Mt. Angel Performing Arts Center" Subject: Re: Venezuelan lamp In-reply-to: Message-id: <45B5A8BB.4010908 [at] mtangelperformingarts.com> References: Laura McMeley wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > I appeal to the knowledge of the list. > I have received a practical lamp to be used in our next production. It > was last used in Venezuela. It has in it a 150w/220v double ended T3 > lamp. The question is - when I replace it with a 120v lamp for use in > the USA, will I get the same lumens with a 150w lamp or a 75w lamp. I > know that a 75w lamp will convert to pulling the same amperage as the > original, but my electrician has suggested that the differences in > filament design will probably compensate for that and require that I > stay with the 150w lamp to get the same lumens as the original. What > do you think? Any other issues you can think of with running this lamp > on US power? > > I believe that you'll find that you'll need the 150 watt lamp to get the same light output on 120 volts. The lamp current is misleading - Although the current in a 75 watt 120 volt lamp will be the same as in a 150 watt 220 volt lamp, the filament is half as long so you'll have about half the illumination output. The only other issues I can think of: 1: The cord cap will have to change from the 220 style and 2: The lamp cord may be undersized for 120 volts at twice the current. Since we're talking about only a bit more than one amp of current at 120 volts, #2 is probably a non-issue. Carla ------------------------------ From: megironda [at] att.net (Gerry G.) Subject: Re: Palm Treo and Bluetooth Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 06:51:51 +0000 Message-Id: <012320070651.24011.45B5B0870005B33D00005DCB21602810600E0B02019D07090A03 [at] att.net> Palm OS is not hurt by MS attacks... The Plantronics 655 Bluetooth was the best of all when I was shopping, I'm very happy with it. -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Occy" > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > All you Palm Treo experts out there which OS is better the Palm OS on the > 700 or Windows Mobile OS? And for you Bluetooth users out there which one of > the many Bluetooths, do you like the best? > ------------------------------ Message-ID: <2248.205.215.253.25.1169545664.squirrel [at] webmail.peak.org> In-Reply-To: References:

Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:47:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Non-Manila Counterweight Operatng line From: "Bill Nelson" > It's very easy to get splinters (which, btw, rank worse than lauan > splinters, imo) from manila rope. Yep. Even high quality manila will have "splinters" when new. I suspect it is pretty much unavoidable, given that the strands are composed of varying lengths of hemp fiber - not the single lengths you find in synthetic rope. Also, hemp fibers tend to be stiffer than synthetic fibers. Bill ------------------------------ You are subscribed as stagecraftlist [at] theatrical.net End of Stagecraft Digest #1103 ******************************