Return-Path: X-Processed-By: Virex 7 on prxy.net X-Real-To: stagecraftlist [at] theatrical.net Received: by prxy.net (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.2.10) with PIPE id 21364800; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 03:01:28 -0800 X-ListServer: CommuniGate Pro LIST 4.2.10 List-Unsubscribe: List-ID: Message-ID: From: "Stagecraft" Sender: "Stagecraft" To: "Stagecraft" Precedence: list Subject: Stagecraft Digest #342 Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 03:01:12 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on prxy.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: X-TFF-CGPSA-Version: 1.4f2 X-prxy-Spam-Filter: Scanned For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- Stagecraft Digest, Issue #342 1. Re: Handheld Cell Phone Jammer by "Storms, Randy" 2. Re: Handheld Cell Phone Jammer by Pat Kight 3. Re: Somewhat delicate reference question by "Dr. Randall W.A. Davidson" 4. Re: Handheld Cell Phone Jammer by "ladesigners [at] juno.com" 5. Laptop Battery (OT) by CB 6. Re: Bouncy mail by Noah Price 7. Re: Is there a list problem or is it a people problem? by Noah Price 8. Re: Rigging Software by Mat Goebel *** Please update the subject line of your reply to use the subject *** line of the message you are replying to! Please only reply to *** one message subject in each reply. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: Handheld Cell Phone Jammer Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:57:54 -0800 Message-ID: <555928311F8B2943B65FC7197942C3B7323A4B [at] es1.bsdnet.wednet.edu> From: "Storms, Randy" I'm more interested in this one: http://www.globalgadgetuk.com/cell%20phone%20detector%20panel%20display.h= tm It detects an active cell phone and turns on an illuminated sign... -- r. Randy Storms rstorms [at] bham.wednet.edu -----Original Message----- >Bring back an old thread....... :-) http://www.globalgadgetuk.com/Personal.htm >About 170 pounds sterling....... not cheap.... >and probably illegal to boot....... ------------------------------ Message-ID: <424377FF.5050701 [at] peak.org> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:31:27 -0800 From: Pat Kight Subject: Re: Handheld Cell Phone Jammer References: In-Reply-To: Storms, Randy wrote: > I'm more interested in this one: > http://www.globalgadgetuk.com/cell%20phone%20detector%20panel%20display.htm > It detects an active cell phone and turns on an illuminated sign... Heh. "You can put your own message in the panel." I can think of all *sorts* of messages that would be very satisfying here ... -- Pat Kight kightp [at] peak.org ------------------------------ From: "Dr. Randall W.A. Davidson" Subject: RE: Somewhat delicate reference question Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:00:50 -0800 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Richard: I am so pleased that you are around to aid us. Thank you. Doom -- Dr. Randall W.A. Davidson, Risk International & Associates, Inc. - www.riskit.com Latest workshops for Educational and Entertainment Industry Performing Arts Personnel (Riggers, and Public Assembly and Educational Technicians) www.riskit.com/workshops International Secondary Education Theater Safety Association (ISETSA) - www.isetsa.org -----Original Message----- From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft [at] theatrical.net] On Behalf Of ladesigners [at] juno.com Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 5:10 PM To: Stagecraft Subject: Re: Somewhat delicate reference question For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see --------------------------------------------------- THIS NOT TRUE! Anyone can contact anyone for any reason, or for no reason, unless there is a properly served restraining order in place, or unless they are listed on some official 'Do Not Call' list. /s/ Richard Frank, In the United States, employers are only allowed to contact references that are listed by the job candidate. If the job candidate doesn't list a former employer, they can't be contacted. Is this clear? Dave Marks ------------------------------ From: "ladesigners [at] juno.com" Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 03:11:52 GMT Subject: Re: Handheld Cell Phone Jammer Message-Id: <20050324.191239.29075.59091 [at] webmail03.lax.untd.com> Fortunately, good taste prevents them from being posted to the list. /s/ Richard Storms, Randy wrote: > I'm more interested in this one: > http://www.globalgadgetuk.com/cell%20phone%20detector%20panel%20display.htm > It detects an active cell phone and turns on an illuminated sign... Heh. "You can put your own message in the panel." I can think of all *sorts* of messages that would be very satisfying here ... Pat Kight kightp [at] peak.org ------------------------------ Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20050325044810.016e9ba8 [at] pop.west.cox.net> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 04:48:10 From: CB Subject: Laptop Battery (OT) >The battery on my Dell Latitude C-810 is about dead and needs replacing. >The original battery is 14.8V Epiphany. The first one that figures out a Dewalt to Dell batery adaptor get to split the profits with me... Back On Topic! Chris "Chris" Babbie Location Sound MON AZ Delete key training and post trimming done by appointment. Rates negotiable, will trade for typing lessons/ADD treatment... ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References:

Message-Id: Cc: marko [at] email.arizona.edu (Mark O'Brien) From: Noah Price Subject: Re: Bouncy mail Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 21:01:37 -0800 On Mar 24, 2005, at 9:13 AM, Mark O'Brien wrote: > I just got this message from the list, for whatever reason. > > This is an automated message from the theatrical.net list manager. > > Stagecraft messages sent to > your address have bounced. > Since you are reading this message, your mail system is probably fixed. > > > I followed the directions, and I am back. > > Q: Why does this happen Delivery and bounce processing are automated, since it would be hard to keep up manually with delivery problems with a list of nearly 1000 subscribers :-) If the problem with your server is recognized as temporary, the mail server running the list will just retry. In your case, a fatal error was reported by your server's spam filtering: message text rejected by smtpgate.email.arizona.edu: 550 Error: Message content rejected I often skim through the bounces looking for spam filtering rejects so I can contact the appropriate postmaster and request whitelisting, but the list receives about 1000 error responses a month (mostly "soft" errors that are retried) so I don't always keep up! So, please ask them to whitelist my server :-) Ideally your admin will whitelist 209.237.15.0/24 (my whole network block) in case the server changes IP address in the future. If they need something more specific, send me email. If others are interested in the specific reason they get these warnings, please email me at stagecraft-web [at] theprices.net On Mar 24, 2005, at 9:13 AM, Mark O'Brien wrote: > Q: When I went to the archive for todays messages, I get nothing. > Why? The searchable archive hasn't been updated since the list moved to theatrical.net. That database has been causing me trouble, so I'm working on a better alternative. As I mentioned in another thread, anyone who is interested in helping evaluate it, please contact me directly at stagecraft-web [at] theprices.net Thanks, Noah ------------------------------ In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <75ca4d2e7a367b256e76bdcd01f06896 [at] theprices.net> From: Noah Price Subject: Re: Is there a list problem or is it a people problem? Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 23:07:16 -0800 On Mar 24, 2005, at 1:51 PM, Stuart Wheaton wrote: > It seems half of the new threads are starting out as complete > hijacks/revisions of existing threads. > > I don't mean threads that drift miles away from where they started, > but "Wagner + lyrics" became "ETCP Handbook"... This occurs when people reply to a message on the list rather than starting a fresh message for a new topic. Even though they change the subject, their email software thinks they are replying to another message and includes an "In-Reply-To:" header with the message-ID of the original message. > I suspect there is a hidden threading cue that isn't deleted when a > reply is used as a template to head a new thread. Exactly. This makes it especially difficult to maintain proper threads in the archives, except by monitoring threads manually. It's similarly difficult when digest subscribers reply with a variation on the subject, since a digest reply doesn't include the original message reference. Noah -- | Noah Price | http://stagecraft.theprices.net/ | | Stagecraft Mailing List | stagecraft-web [at] theprices.net | ------------------------------ Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 02:48:54 -0800 From: Mat Goebel Reply-To: Mat Goebel Subject: Re: Rigging Software In-Reply-To: References:

I agree whole wholeheartedly. I would say the exception though, is if you create your own spreadsheets. In order to do that, you have to have a *very* solid understanding of the math involved. On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:09:18 -0500, Bill Sapsis wrote: > For info, archives & UNSUBSCRIBE, see > --------------------------------------------------- > > on 3/24/05 11:41 AM, Scheu Consulting Services at peter [at] scheuconsulting.com > wrote: > > > I'm running Excel 2002 with WinXP Pro and I, too, am having the same date > > vs. absolute value cell format problem. > > I'm not running any of those programs. I do the math longhand and I'm done > that job and have moved on to another project. > > This is EXACTLY why I stress that you learn the math. Do not rely on the > computer program. Too many times I've seen guys scratching their heads > because they left their laptop at the hotel and they hadn't a clue how to do > the math on paper. > > And the number of times the computer was wrong, for whatever reason??? > Don't get me started. > > Bill S. > www.sapsis-rigging.com > 800.727.7471 > 800.292.3851 fax > 267.278.4561 mobile > > Please support the Long Reach Long Riders on their 2nd annual benefit ride > http://sapsis-rigging.com/LRLR.html > > -- Mat Goebel Cell: 510.693.1448 ------------------------------ End of Stagecraft Digest #342 *****************************